o4-mini OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.066000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
Output: $0.066000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 15,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
- Output Cost: $0.066000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
- Total Cost: $0.083875 (rounded ~ $0.08)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001290
- Tokens per dollar: 774,963 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 180 tokens per second and 280ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 6 minutes, 4.90 seconds
- Latency: 280 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 180 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 178 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for o4-mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →deepseek-r1 DeepSeek
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.032850 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.032850 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 15,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Output Cost: $0.032850 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Total Cost: $0.040138
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000618
- Tokens per dollar: 1,619,433 tokens
- Context Window: 163840 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 120 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 9 minutes, 7.26 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 120 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 119 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for deepseek-r1. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to o4-mini| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs o4-mini | vs deepseek-r1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.006125 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 92.7% cheaper | ↓ 84.7% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.025750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 69.3% cheaper | ↓ 35.8% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.026563 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 68.3% cheaper | ↓ 33.8% cheaper |
| #4 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.030625 | ↓ 63.5% cheaper | ↓ 23.7% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.042375 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 49.5% cheaper | ↑ 5.6% more |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.042375 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 49.5% cheaper | ↑ 5.6% more |
| #7 |
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
|
$0.046250 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 44.9% cheaper | ↑ 15.2% more |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 36.7% cheaper | ↑ 32.4% more |
| #9 |
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
|
$0.056325 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 32.8% cheaper | ↑ 40.3% more |
| #10 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.057813 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 31.1% cheaper | ↑ 44% more |
| #11 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.057813 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 31.1% cheaper | ↑ 44% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.068438 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 18.4% cheaper | ↑ 70.5% more |
| #13 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 9.1% cheaper | ↑ 90% more |
| #14 |
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
|
$0.077931 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 7.1% cheaper | ↑ 94.2% more |
| #15 |
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI
|
$0.077931 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 7.1% cheaper | ↑ 94.2% more |
| #16 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.079688 | ↓ 5% cheaper | ↑ 98.5% more |
| #17 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.091250 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 8.8% more | ↑ 127.3% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 26.7% more | ↑ 164.7% more |
| #19 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$0.122500 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 46.1% more | ↑ 205.2% more |
| #20 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$0.122500 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 46.1% more | ↑ 205.2% more |
| #21 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.136875 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↑ 63.2% more | ↑ 241% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.159375 | ↑ 90% more | ↑ 297.1% more |
| #23 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.170313 | ↑ 103.1% more | ↑ 324.3% more |
| #24 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.182500 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 117.6% more | ↑ 354.7% more |
| #25 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.212500 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 153.4% more | ↑ 429.4% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.238438 (rounded ~ $0.24) | ↑ 184.3% more | ↑ 494.1% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.238438 (rounded ~ $0.24) | ↑ 184.3% more | ↑ 494.1% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.265625 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 216.7% more | ↑ 561.8% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.265625 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 216.7% more | ↑ 561.8% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.265625 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 216.7% more | ↑ 561.8% more |
| #31 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.273750 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 226.4% more | ↑ 582% more |
| #32 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.456250 (rounded ~ $0.46) | ↑ 444% more | ↑ 1036.7% more |
| #33 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.456250 (rounded ~ $0.46) | ↑ 444% more | ↑ 1036.7% more |
| #34 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.456250 (rounded ~ $0.46) | ↑ 444% more | ↑ 1036.7% more |
| #35 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.456250 (rounded ~ $0.46) | ↑ 444% more | ↑ 1036.7% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.531250 (rounded ~ $0.53) | ↑ 533.4% more | ↑ 1223.6% more |
| #37 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.531250 (rounded ~ $0.53) | ↑ 533.4% more | ↑ 1223.6% more |
| #38 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.531250 (rounded ~ $0.53) | ↑ 533.4% more | ↑ 1223.6% more |
| #39 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.762500 (rounded ~ $0.76) | ↑ 809.1% more | ↑ 1799.7% more |
| #40 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.884375 (rounded ~ $0.88) | ↑ 954.4% more | ↑ 2103.4% more |
| #41 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.884375 (rounded ~ $0.88) | ↑ 954.4% more | ↑ 2103.4% more |
| #42 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.912500 (rounded ~ $0.91) | ↑ 987.9% more | ↑ 2173.4% more |
| #43 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.912500 (rounded ~ $0.91) | ↑ 987.9% more | ↑ 2173.4% more |
| #44 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.912500 (rounded ~ $0.91) | ↑ 987.9% more | ↑ 2173.4% more |
| #45 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$1.525000 (rounded ~ $1.53) | ↑ 1718.2% more | ↑ 3699.4% more |
| #46 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$2.861250 (rounded ~ $2.86) | ↑ 3311.3% more | ↑ 7028.6% more |
| #47 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$2.861250 (rounded ~ $2.86) | ↑ 3311.3% more | ↑ 7028.6% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Grok Build 0.1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Grok 4.6 xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
The Smart-Small Model Revolution
Reasoning models no longer require massive budgets. We compare OpenAI’s o4-mini against the open-source powerhouse DeepSeek-R1. This analysis focuses on ‘Thinking Token’ efficiency: which model solves complex math and logic problems with the fewest wasted cycles?