Evaluating Llama 4 Maverick (400B) for Cost-Effective EdTech Multi-Agent Workflows

Complete Analysis: 122,500 tokens for Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
⚡ 20% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for Meta AI's Llama 4 Maverick (400B) model with 20% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 0% savings)
$0.019500 Total Cost
122,500 Total Tokens
5 minutes, 27.87 seconds Processing Time
374 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AIMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$0.15 / $0.6 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
20%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.018000 Input Cost
$0.001500 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
122,500Total Tokens
$0.000159Cost per 1K
6,282,051Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

5m 27s Processing Time
400 Tokens/Second
150ms Time to First Token
374 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing

Llama 4 Maverick (400B) Meta AI 1000000

$0.019500
Total Cost
⚡ 20% Cached 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✗ Not Available

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.019500 Input: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.001500
Optimized Cost $0.019500 Input: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.001500
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 120,000 input tokens and 2,500 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
  • Output Cost: $0.001500
  • Total Cost: $0.019500
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000159
  • Tokens per dollar: 6,282,051 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 150ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 5 minutes, 27.87 seconds
  • Latency: 150 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 374 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

For cost-sensitive multi-agent systems requiring large context handling and strong general reasoning in EdTech.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Llama 4 Maverick (400B). Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 120,000
Output Tokens: 2,500
Cached Tokens: 20%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
$0.010590 Best Value ↓ 45.7% cheaper
🥈 Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
$0.023430 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 20.2% more
🥉 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.028350 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 45.4% more
#4 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.035770 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 83.4% more
#5 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.052950 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 171.5% more
#6 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.056700 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 190.8% more
#7 Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
$0.067548 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 246.4% more
#8 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.085050 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 336.2% more
#9 Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
$0.105076 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 438.9% more
#10 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.108400 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 455.9% more
#11 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.110900 ↑ 468.7% more
#12 o4-mini
OpenAI
$0.119240 ↑ 511.5% more
#13 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.129250 ↑ 562.8% more
#14 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.148000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 659% more
#15 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.170100 ↑ 772.3% more
#16 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.207200 (rounded ~ $0.21) ↑ 962.6% more
#17 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.207200 (rounded ~ $0.21) ↑ 962.6% more
#18 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.211800 (rounded ~ $0.21) ↑ 986.2% more
#19 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.226800 (rounded ~ $0.23) ↑ 1063.1% more
#20 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.283500 (rounded ~ $0.28) ↑ 1353.8% more
#21 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.283500 (rounded ~ $0.28) ↑ 1353.8% more
#22 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.332700 (rounded ~ $0.33) ↑ 1606.2% more
#23 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.554500 (rounded ~ $0.55) ↑ 2743.6% more
#24 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.554500 (rounded ~ $0.55) ↑ 2743.6% more
#25 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.554500 (rounded ~ $0.55) ↑ 2743.6% more
#26 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.567000 (rounded ~ $0.57) ↑ 2807.7% more
#27 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.567000 (rounded ~ $0.57) ↑ 2807.7% more
#28 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
$1.084000 (rounded ~ $1.08) ↑ 5459% more
#29 o3 Pro
OpenAI
$2.168000 (rounded ~ $2.17) ↑ 11017.9% more
#30 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$2.486400 (rounded ~ $2.49) ↑ 12650.8% more
#31 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$2.486400 (rounded ~ $2.49) ↑ 12650.8% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.010590
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 45.7%
🥈

Grok Code Fast 1
xAI

$0.023430 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 20.2%
🥉

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.028350 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 45.4%
#4

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.035770 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 83.4%
#5

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.052950 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 171.5%
#6

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.056700 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 190.8%
#7

Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI

$0.067548 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 246.4%
#8

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.085050 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 336.2%
#9

Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI

$0.105076 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 438.9%
#10

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.108400 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 455.9%
#11

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.110900
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 468.7%
#12

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.119240
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 511.5%
#13

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.129250
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 562.8%
#14

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.148000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 659%
#15

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.170100
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 772.3%
#16

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.207200 (rounded ~ $0.21)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 962.6%
#17

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.207200 (rounded ~ $0.21)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 962.6%
#18

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.211800 (rounded ~ $0.21)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 986.2%
#19

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.226800 (rounded ~ $0.23)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 1063.1%
#20

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.283500 (rounded ~ $0.28)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 1353.8%
#21

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.283500 (rounded ~ $0.28)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 1353.8%
#22

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.332700 (rounded ~ $0.33)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 1606.2%
#23

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.554500 (rounded ~ $0.55)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 2743.6%
#24

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.554500 (rounded ~ $0.55)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 2743.6%
#25

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.554500 (rounded ~ $0.55)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 2743.6%
#26

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.567000 (rounded ~ $0.57)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 2807.7%
#27

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.567000 (rounded ~ $0.57)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 2807.7%
#28

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$1.084000 (rounded ~ $1.08)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 5459%
#29

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$2.168000 (rounded ~ $2.17)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 11017.9%
#30

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$2.486400 (rounded ~ $2.49)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 12650.8%
#31

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$2.486400 (rounded ~ $2.49)
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 12650.8%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Llama 4 Maverick (400B): A Cost-Effective Powerhouse for EdTech AI Orchestration

For EdTech product managers focused on delivering scalable AI tutoring solutions without breaking the bank, Meta AI’s Llama 4 Maverick (400B) presents a highly attractive option. This model combines strong reasoning and multimodal capabilities with an exceptionally competitive price point, making it ideal for multi-agent orchestration where cost per session is a critical factor.

Model Strengths for Multi-Agent Orchestration:

  • Exceptional Cost-Performance: Llama 4 Maverick offers one of the best performance-to-cost ratios available, with pricing as low as $0.15 per 1 million input tokens and $0.60 per 1 million output tokens [19]. This makes it highly scalable for large numbers of concurrent agents or frequent task executions.
  • Large Context Window: With a 1,000,000 token context window, it can effectively manage complex educational scenarios, student histories, and detailed lesson plans.
  • Multimodal Capabilities: While the primary use case is text-based orchestration, its support for vision allows for future expansion into interactive learning materials or student work analysis.
  • Reasoning and Tool Use: The model is capable of complex reasoning and tool integration, essential for agents to perform tasks like retrieving educational content, analyzing student responses, or guiding learning paths.

Pricing Analysis:

The pricing of Llama 4 Maverick is remarkably low, positioning it as a leading choice for cost-sensitive applications [19]. While some sources may show slightly varied pricing, the $0.15/$0.60 per million tokens is a widely cited benchmark for its value proposition.

Cost Example for Multi-Agent Orchestration (120K Input, 2.5K Output Tokens):

Consider an orchestrator managing student progress tracking and adaptive content assignment, using 120,000 input tokens and generating 2,500 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: (120,000 / 1,000,000) * $0.15 = $0.018
  • Output Cost: (2,500 / 1,000,000) * $0.60 = $0.0015
  • Total per task: $0.0195

For 10,000 such tasks per month, this would only cost approximately $195. This extremely low cost allows for extensive use of AI agents, even in high-volume tutoring scenarios, without prohibitive expenses.

Best Use Cases:

Highly recommended for multi-agent systems where cost-per-session is a primary constraint, such as large-scale adaptive learning platforms, automated assessment graders, or personalized learning path generators that require processing significant context.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.