Cheapest Model for 100K Text Generation Tokens: DeepSeek V4 Flash

Complete Analysis: 100,500 tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for DeepSeek's DeepSeek V4 Flash model with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings)
$0.003990 Total Cost
100,500 Total Tokens
2 minutes, 45.62 seconds Processing Time
607 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeekMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$0.07 / $0.28 per 1M tokens
▼
▼
Use Batch API (50% discount)
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.003990 Total Cost
$0.003500 Input Cost
$0.000140 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
100,500Total Tokens
$0.000040Cost per 1K
25,187,970Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

2m 45s Processing Time
650 Tokens/Second
95ms Time to First Token
607 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after
🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)
🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier
📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited
🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek 1000000

$0.003990
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API
👁️
Vision/Images
✗ Not Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✗ Not Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.007140 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000140
Optimized Cost $0.003990 Input: $0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000140
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.003150 44.1% discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Output Cost: $0.000140
  • Total Cost: $0.003990
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000040
  • Tokens per dollar: 25,187,970 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 650 tokens per second and 95ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 2 minutes, 45.62 seconds
  • Latency: 95 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 650 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 607 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for bulk text generation at the lowest possible costperfect for social media content farmsproduct descriptionsand low-budget AI prototypes.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for DeepSeek V4 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to DeepSeek V4 Flash
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 100,000
Output Tokens: 500
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
 $0.001413 Best Value ↓ 64.6% cheaper
🥈 Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
 $0.001413 ↓ 64.6% cheaper
🥉 Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
 $0.002938 ↓ 26.4% cheaper
#4 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.003625 ↓ 9.1% cheaper
#5 Nemotron 3 Super
Mistral AI
 $0.004228 ↑ 6% more
#6 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.004438 ↑ 11.2% more
#7 Devstral 2
Mistral AI
 $0.005613 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 40.7% more
#8 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.007063 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 77% more
#9 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
 $0.010875 ↑ 172.6% more
#10 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.014250 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 257.1% more
#11 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.014375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 260.3% more
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.014500 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 263.4% more
#13 o4-mini
OpenAI
 $0.015675 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 292.9% more
#14 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.017500 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 338.6% more
#15 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
 $0.021750 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 445.1% more
#16 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
 $0.025813 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 546.9% more
#17 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.025813 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 546.9% more
#18 Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
 $0.028125 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 604.9% more
#19 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.028250 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 608% more
#20 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.036875 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 824.2% more
#21 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.043125 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 980.8% more
#22 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 1353.6% more
#23 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
 $0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 1701.4% more
#24 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 1701.4% more
#25 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 1701.4% more
#26 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 1717% more
#27 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 1717% more
#28 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 1717% more
#29 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.142500 (rounded ~ $0.14) ↑ 3471.4% more
#30 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 3534.1% more
#31 o3 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.285000 (rounded ~ $0.29) ↑ 7042.9% more
#32 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.309750 ↑ 7663.2% more
#33 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.309750 ↑ 7663.2% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.001413
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 64.6%
🥈

Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI

$0.001413
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 64.6%
🥉

Grok Code Fast 1
xAI

$0.002938
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 26.4%
#4

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.003625
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 9.1%
#5

Nemotron 3 Super
Mistral AI

$0.004228
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 6%
#6

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.004438
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 11.2%
#7

Devstral 2
Mistral AI

$0.005613 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 40.7%
#8

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.007063 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 77%
#9

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.010875
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 172.6%
#10

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.014250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 257.1%
#11

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.014375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 260.3%
#12

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.014500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 263.4%
#13

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.015675 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 292.9%
#14

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.017500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 338.6%
#15

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.021750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 445.1%
#16

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.025813 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 546.9%
#17

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.025813 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 546.9%
#18

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI

$0.028125 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 604.9%
#19

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.028250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 608%
#20

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.036875 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 824.2%
#21

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.043125 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 980.8%
#22

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1353.6%
#23

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1701.4%
#24

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1701.4%
#25

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.071875 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1701.4%
#26

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1717%
#27

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1717%
#28

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1717%
#29

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.142500 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 3471.4%
#30

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 3534.1%
#31

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.285000 (rounded ~ $0.29)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 7042.9%
#32

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.309750
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 7663.2%
#33

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.309750
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 7663.2%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For social media managers tasked with bulk content generation, identifying the most cost-effective AI solution is key to scaling operations efficiently. DeepSeek V4 Flash distinguishes itself by offering an unparalleled price-to-performance ratio for text-based workloads. This model is specifically designed to handle high-volume text generation, making it an excellent choice for creating thousands of product descriptions, social media captions, or ad variations without significant budget strain. Its core strength lies in its affordability and speed for churning out text content, which is precisely what many content-focused teams require for MVP projects or ongoing content pipelines. While it might not possess the advanced multimodal capabilities or complex reasoning of higher-tier models, its straightforward efficiency in text output makes it a standout for its intended use case. Social media managers can leverage DeepSeek V4 Flash to rapidly populate e-commerce sites, test marketing copy, or maintain a consistent flow of digital content. The model’s substantial context window also adds flexibility, enabling it to process larger prompts for more detailed outputs, ensuring that budget constraints do not limit creative potential in text generation. When choosing an AI, consider not only the per-token cost but also the API reliability and ease of integration for your specific workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.