Cost-Effective Legal Review: DeepSeek V4 Flash for 100K Tokens

Complete Analysis: 103,000 tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for DeepSeek's DeepSeek V4 Flash model with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings)
$0.004690 Total Cost
103,000 Total Tokens
2 minutes, 49.73 seconds Processing Time
607 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeekMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$0.07 / $0.28 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.003500 Input Cost
$0.000840 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
103,000Total Tokens
$0.000046Cost per 1K
21,961,620Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

2m 49s Processing Time
650 Tokens/Second
95ms Time to First Token
607 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek 1000000

$0.004690
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API
👁️
Vision/Images
✗ Not Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✗ Not Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.007840 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000840
Optimized Cost $0.004690 Input: $0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000840
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.003150 40.2% discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 3,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Output Cost: $0.000840
  • Total Cost: $0.004690
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000046
  • Tokens per dollar: 21,961,620 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 650 tokens per second and 95ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 2 minutes, 49.73 seconds
  • Latency: 95 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 650 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 607 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for budget-conscious projects needing high-volume text processing for tasks like clause extraction in legal documentsoffering excellent value for its performance.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for DeepSeek V4 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to DeepSeek V4 Flash
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 100,000
Output Tokens: 3,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
$0.001600 Best Value ↓ 65.9% cheaper
🥈 Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
$0.001600 ↓ 65.9% cheaper
🥉 Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
$0.003875 ↓ 17.4% cheaper
#4 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.004563 ↓ 2.7% cheaper
#5 Nemotron 3 Super
Mistral AI
$0.004740 ↑ 1.1% more
#6 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 27.9% more
#7 Devstral 2
Mistral AI
$0.006175 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 31.7% more
#8 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.008000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 70.6% more
#9 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.013688 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 191.8% more
#10 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 257.1% more
#11 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.017500 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 273.1% more
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.018250 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 289.1% more
#13 o4-mini
OpenAI
$0.018425 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 292.9% more
#14 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.019063 ↑ 306.4% more
#15 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.027375 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 483.7% more
#16 Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 566.3% more
#17 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.032000 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 582.3% more
#18 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.034563 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 636.9% more
#19 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.034563 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 636.9% more
#20 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.049375 ↑ 952.8% more
#21 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 1019.4% more
#22 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.073000 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 1456.5% more
#23 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 1765.7% more
#24 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 1765.7% more
#25 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 1765.7% more
#26 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.091250 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 1845.6% more
#27 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.091250 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 1845.6% more
#28 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.091250 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 1845.6% more
#29 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17) ↑ 3471.4% more
#30 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.182500 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 3791.3% more
#31 o3 Pro
OpenAI
$0.335000 (rounded ~ $0.34) ↑ 7042.9% more
#32 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.414750 (rounded ~ $0.41) ↑ 8743.3% more
#33 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.414750 (rounded ~ $0.41) ↑ 8743.3% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.001600
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 65.9%
🥈

Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI

$0.001600
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 65.9%
🥉

Grok Code Fast 1
xAI

$0.003875
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 17.4%
#4

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.004563
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 2.7%
#5

Nemotron 3 Super
Mistral AI

$0.004740
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1.1%
#6

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 27.9%
#7

Devstral 2
Mistral AI

$0.006175 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 31.7%
#8

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.008000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 70.6%
#9

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.013688 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 191.8%
#10

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 257.1%
#11

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.017500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 273.1%
#12

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.018250 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 289.1%
#13

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.018425 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 292.9%
#14

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.019063
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 306.4%
#15

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.027375 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 483.7%
#16

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI

$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 566.3%
#17

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.032000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 582.3%
#18

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.034563 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 636.9%
#19

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.034563 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 636.9%
#20

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.049375
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 952.8%
#21

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1019.4%
#22

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.073000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1456.5%
#23

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1765.7%
#24

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1765.7%
#25

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1765.7%
#26

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.091250 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1845.6%
#27

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.091250 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1845.6%
#28

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.091250 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1845.6%
#29

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 3471.4%
#30

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.182500 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 3791.3%
#31

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.335000 (rounded ~ $0.34)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 7042.9%
#32

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.414750 (rounded ~ $0.41)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 8743.3%
#33

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.414750 (rounded ~ $0.41)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 8743.3%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For data analysts tackling legal contract review on a budget, DeepSeek V4 Flash presents a compelling option for clause extraction. This model is engineered for efficiency, making it ideal for processing large volumes of text without breaking the bank. Its high token limit and competitive pricing structure are particularly attractive for MVPs and individual projects where cost optimization is paramount. When analyzing 50-page contracts for specific clauses, DeepSeek V4 Flash can deliver accurate results, enabling rapid prototyping and deployment of legal tech solutions. While it may not possess the nuanced reasoning of some premium models, its performance-to-cost ratio makes it a standout choice for developers prioritizing affordability and throughput for text-heavy analytical tasks. Consider this model when building solutions that require robust text processing without a premium price tag, ensuring your project stays lean and scalable.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.