Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic
$0.000044
Total Cost
Vision/Images
✓ Available
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
Tool Usage
✓ Available
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Base Cost (No Optimizations)
$0.000044
Input: $0.000013
Output: $0.000031
Output: $0.000031
Optimized Cost
$0.000044
Input: $0.000013
Output: $0.000031
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Output: $0.000031
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 200 input tokens and 100 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.000013
- Output Cost: $0.000031
- Total Cost: $0.000044
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000146
- Tokens per dollar: 6,857,143 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 75ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 0.56 seconds
- Latency: 75 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 794 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Ideal for cost-sensitivehigh-volume text generation tasks like generating personalized email intros or simple content variations where budget is the primary constraint.
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Haiku 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Haiku 4.6
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens:
200
Output Tokens:
100
Batch API:
Enabled (50% discount)
| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Haiku 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.000013 Best Value | ↓ 71.4% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Voxtral Small 24B
Mistral AI
|
$0.000013 | ↓ 71.4% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.000013 | ↓ 71.4% cheaper |
| #4 |
Ministral 3 (14B)
Mistral AI
|
$0.000015 | ↓ 65.7% cheaper |
| #5 |
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
|
$0.000036 | ↓ 18.9% cheaper |
| #6 |
Devstral 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.000043 | ↓ 2.9% cheaper |
| #7 |
Llama 4 Scout
Meta AI
|
$0.000046 | ↑ 5.1% more |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.000050 | ↑ 14.3% more |
| #9 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.000063 | ↑ 42.9% more |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.000078 | ↑ 77.1% more |
| #11 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.000078 | ↑ 77.1% more |
| #12 |
Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AI
|
$0.000090 | ↑ 105.7% more |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.000131 | ↑ 200% more |
| #14 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.000150 | ↑ 242.9% more |
| #15 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.000150 | ↑ 242.9% more |
| #16 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.000165 | ↑ 277.1% more |
| #17 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.000175 | ↑ 300% more |
| #18 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.000200 | ↑ 357.1% more |
| #19 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.000200 | ↑ 357.1% more |
| #20 |
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
|
$0.000225 | ↑ 414.3% more |
| #21 |
Llama 3.3 70B
Meta AI
|
$0.000240 | ↑ 448.6% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.000263 | ↑ 500% more |
| #23 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.000300 | ↑ 585.7% more |
| #24 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.000350 | ↑ 700% more |
| #25 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.000400 | ↑ 814.3% more |
| #26 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.000400 | ↑ 814.3% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.000438 | ↑ 900% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.000438 | ↑ 900% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.000500 | ↑ 1042.9% more |
| #30 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.000525 | ↑ 1100% more |
| #31 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.000625 | ↑ 1328.6% more |
| #32 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.000800 | ↑ 1728.6% more |
| #33 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.000875 | ↑ 1900% more |
| #34 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.000875 | ↑ 1900% more |
| #35 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.000875 | ↑ 1900% more |
| #36 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.000875 | ↑ 1900% more |
| #37 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.001000 | ↑ 2185.7% more |
| #38 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.001000 | ↑ 2185.7% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.001000 | ↑ 2185.7% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.001000 | ↑ 2185.7% more |
| #41 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.001500 | ↑ 3328.6% more |
| #42 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.001750 | ↑ 3900% more |
| #43 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.001750 | ↑ 3900% more |
| #44 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.001750 | ↑ 3900% more |
| #45 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.001750 | ↑ 3900% more |
| #46 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.002000 | ↑ 4471.4% more |
| #47 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.003000 | ↑ 6757.1% more |
| #48 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.003500 | ↑ 7900% more |
| #49 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.005250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 11900% more |
| #50 |
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 13614.3% more |
| #51 |
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 13614.3% more |
🏆
Mistral Small 3
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
$0.000013
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↓ 71.4%
🥈
Voxtral Small 24B
Voxtral Small 24B Mistral AI
$0.000013
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↓ 71.4%
🥉
Devstral Small 2
Devstral Small 2 Mistral AI
$0.000013
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↓ 71.4%
#4
Ministral 3 (14B)
Ministral 3 (14B) Mistral AI
$0.000015
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↓ 65.7%
#5
Nemotron 3 Super
Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA
$0.000036
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↓ 18.9%
#6
Devstral 2
Devstral 2 Mistral AI
$0.000043
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↓ 2.9%
#7
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout Meta AI
$0.000046
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 5.1%
#8
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
$0.000050
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 14.3%
#9
Mistral Large 3
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
$0.000063
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 42.9%
#10
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
$0.000078
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 77.1%
#11
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
$0.000078
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 77.1%
#12
Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Llama 4 Maverick (400B) Meta AI
$0.000090
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 105.7%
#13
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
$0.000131
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 200%
#14
GPT-5.4 mini
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
$0.000150
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 242.9%
#15
o4-mini Deep Research
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
$0.000150
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 242.9%
#16
o4-mini
o4-mini OpenAI
$0.000165
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 277.1%
#17
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
$0.000175
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 300%
#18
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
$0.000200
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 357.1%
#19
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
$0.000200
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 357.1%
#20
Magistral Medium
Magistral Medium Mistral AI
$0.000225
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 414.3%
#21
Llama 3.3 70B
Llama 3.3 70B Meta AI
$0.000240
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 448.6%
#22
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
$0.000263
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 500%
#23
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
$0.000300
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 585.7%
#24
Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
$0.000350
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 700%
#25
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 xAI
$0.000400
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 814.3%
#26
Grok 4.20 Beta
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
$0.000400
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 814.3%
#27
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
$0.000438
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 900%
#28
GPT-5.3 Instant
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
$0.000438
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 900%
#29
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
$0.000500
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 1042.9%
#30
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
$0.000525
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 1100%
#31
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
$0.000625
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 1328.6%
#32
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
$0.000800
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 1728.6%
#33
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
$0.000875
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 1900%
#34
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
$0.000875
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 1900%
#35
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
$0.000875
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 1900%
#36
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
$0.000875
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 1900%
#37
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
$0.001000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 2185.7%
#38
GPT-5.4 Thinking
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
$0.001000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 2185.7%
#39
GPT-5.5 Instant
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
$0.001000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 2185.7%
#40
GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
$0.001000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 2185.7%
#41
o3 Deep Research
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
$0.001500
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 3328.6%
#42
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
$0.001750
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 3900%
#43
Claude Mythos 5.1
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
$0.001750
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 3900%
#44
Claude Fable 5
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
$0.001750
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 3900%
#45
Claude Mythos 5
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
$0.001750
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 3900%
#46
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
$0.002000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 4471.4%
#47
o3 Pro
o3 Pro OpenAI
$0.003000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 6757.1%
#48
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
$0.003500
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 7900%
#49
GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
$0.005250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 11900%
#50
GPT-5.5 Pro
GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 13614.3%
#51
GPT-5.5 Pro
GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6:
↑ 13614.3%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.
For solo SaaS founders aiming to deliver engaging personalized newsletters to 10,000 subscribers, cost-efficiency is paramount. Claude Haiku 4.6 emerges as a leading contender for this task, offering a compelling blend of affordability and capability. Its strength lies in executing discrete, high-volume text generation tasks without breaking the bank. When crafting unique introductions for each recipient, Haiku’s ability to process prompts with specific personalization instructions efficiently makes it an ideal choice. While not the most powerful model for complex reasoning, its speed and low cost per token allow founders to scale their personalization efforts significantly. The key advantage for a lean operation is Haiku’s ability to generate consistent, on-brief content at a scale that would be prohibitively expensive with premium models. This makes it a practical workhorse for founders prioritizing budget control while still enhancing subscriber experience through tailored content.
Frequently Asked Questions
How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly.
We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing.
Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.