DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick: 50,000 Personalized Newsletter Intros (200 Tokens Input Each)

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Complete Comparison: 200 input tokens × 100 output tokens
Comparison Mode

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models .

Comparison Criteria DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek
Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs)
Input Tokens 200 200
Output Tokens 100 100
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.000014Best $0.000030Worst
Output Cost $0.000028Best $0.000060Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.000042 Best Value $0.000090 Most Expensive
Processing Time 0.67 seconds Fastest 0.98 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second 650Fastest 400Slowest
Time to First Token 95ms Best 150ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000140Best $0.000300Worst
Tokens per Dollar 7,142,857Best Value 3,333,333Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.070000Best $0.150000Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $0.280000Best $0.600000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.070000Best
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
$0.150000Worst
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.280000Best
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
$0.600000Worst
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✗ Not Supported ✓ Supported
Caching Support ✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported
Batch API Support ✗ Not Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeekMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$0.07 / $0.28 per 1M tokens
▼
▼
Use Batch API (50% discount)
0%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.000042 Total Cost
$0.000014 Input Cost
$0.000028 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
300Total Tokens
$0.000140Cost per 1K
7,142,857Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

674ms Processing Time
650 Tokens/Second
95ms Time to First Token
607 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after
🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)
🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier
📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited
🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek 1000000

$0.000042
Total Cost
📊 Batch API
👁️
Vision/Images
✗ Not Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✗ Not Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.000042 Input: $0.000014
Output: $0.000028
Optimized Cost $0.000042 Input: $0.000014
Output: $0.000028
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 200 input tokens and 100 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.000014
  • Output Cost: $0.000028
  • Total Cost: $0.000042
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000140
  • Tokens per dollar: 7,142,857 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 650 tokens per second and 95ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 0.67 seconds
  • Latency: 95 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 650 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 607 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Compares two cost-effectivelarge-context open-weight models for generating high volumes of personalized textsuitable for scaling content creation for SaaS products.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for DeepSeek V4 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Llama 4 Maverick (400B) Meta AI 1000000

$0.000090
Total Cost
📊 Batch API
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✗ Not Available

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.000090 Input: $0.000030
Output: $0.000060
Optimized Cost $0.000090 Input: $0.000030
Output: $0.000060
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 200 input tokens and 100 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.000030
  • Output Cost: $0.000060
  • Total Cost: $0.000090
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000300
  • Tokens per dollar: 3,333,333 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 150ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 0.98 seconds
  • Latency: 150 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 374 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Compares two cost-effectivelarge-context open-weight models for generating high volumes of personalized textsuitable for scaling content creation for SaaS products.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Llama 4 Maverick (400B). Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to DeepSeek V4 Flash
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 200
Output Tokens: 100
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
 $0.000013 Best Value ↓ 70.2% cheaper ↓ 86.1% cheaper
🥈 Voxtral Small 24B
Mistral AI
 $0.000013 ↓ 70.2% cheaper ↓ 86.1% cheaper
🥉 Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
 $0.000013 ↓ 70.2% cheaper ↓ 86.1% cheaper
#4 Ministral 3 (14B)
Mistral AI
 $0.000015 ↓ 64.3% cheaper ↓ 83.3% cheaper
#5 Nemotron 3 Super
Mistral AI
 $0.000036 ↓ 15.5% cheaper ↓ 60.6% cheaper
#6 Devstral 2
Mistral AI
 $0.000043 ↑ 1.2% more ↓ 52.8% cheaper
#7 Llama 4 Scout
Meta AI
 $0.000046 ↑ 9.5% more ↓ 48.9% cheaper
#8 Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
 $0.000048 ↑ 13.1% more ↓ 47.2% cheaper
#9 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.000050 ↑ 19% more ↓ 44.4% cheaper
#10 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.000063 ↑ 48.8% more ↓ 30.6% cheaper
#11 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.000078 ↑ 84.5% more ↓ 13.9% cheaper
#12 Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AI
 $0.000090 ↑ 114.3% more Same price
#13 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.000125 ↑ 197.6% more ↑ 38.9% more
#14 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
 $0.000150 ↑ 257.1% more ↑ 66.7% more
#15 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.000150 ↑ 257.1% more ↑ 66.7% more
#16 o4-mini
OpenAI
 $0.000165 ↑ 292.9% more ↑ 83.3% more
#17 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.000175 ↑ 316.7% more ↑ 94.4% more
#18 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.000200 ↑ 376.2% more ↑ 122.2% more
#19 Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
 $0.000225 ↑ 435.7% more ↑ 150% more
#20 Llama 3.3 70B
Meta AI
 $0.000240 ↑ 471.4% more ↑ 166.7% more
#21 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.000250 ↑ 495.2% more ↑ 177.8% more
#22 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
 $0.000300 ↑ 614.3% more ↑ 233.3% more
#23 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
 $0.000438 ↑ 941.7% more ↑ 386.1% more
#24 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.000438 ↑ 941.7% more ↑ 386.1% more
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.000525 ↑ 1150% more ↑ 483.3% more
#26 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.000625 ↑ 1388.1% more ↑ 594.4% more
#27 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.000800 ↑ 1804.8% more ↑ 788.9% more
#28 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
 $0.000875 ↑ 1983.3% more ↑ 872.2% more
#29 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.000875 ↑ 1983.3% more ↑ 872.2% more
#30 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.000875 ↑ 1983.3% more ↑ 872.2% more
#31 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.001000 ↑ 2281% more ↑ 1011.1% more
#32 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.001000 ↑ 2281% more ↑ 1011.1% more
#33 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.001000 ↑ 2281% more ↑ 1011.1% more
#34 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.001500 ↑ 3471.4% more ↑ 1566.7% more
#35 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.002000 ↑ 4661.9% more ↑ 2122.2% more
#36 o3 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.003000 ↑ 7042.9% more ↑ 3233.3% more
#37 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.005250 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 12400% more ↑ 5733.3% more
#38 GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 14185.7% more ↑ 6566.7% more
#39 GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 14185.7% more ↑ 6566.7% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.000013
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 70.2%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 86.1%
🥈

Voxtral Small 24B
Mistral AI

$0.000013
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 70.2%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 86.1%
🥉

Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI

$0.000013
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 70.2%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 86.1%
#4

Ministral 3 (14B)
Mistral AI

$0.000015
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 64.3%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 83.3%
#5

Nemotron 3 Super
Mistral AI

$0.000036
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 15.5%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 60.6%
#6

Devstral 2
Mistral AI

$0.000043
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1.2%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 52.8%
#7

Llama 4 Scout
Meta AI

$0.000046
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 9.5%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 48.9%
#8

Grok Code Fast 1
xAI

$0.000048
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 13.1%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 47.2%
#9

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.000050
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 19%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 44.4%
#10

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.000063
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 48.8%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 30.6%
#11

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.000078
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 84.5%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↓ 13.9%
#12

Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AI

$0.000090
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 114.3%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): Same
#13

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.000125
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 197.6%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 38.9%
#14

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.000150
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 257.1%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 66.7%
#15

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.000150
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 257.1%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 66.7%
#16

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.000165
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 292.9%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 83.3%
#17

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.000175
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 316.7%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 94.4%
#18

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.000200
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 376.2%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 122.2%
#19

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI

$0.000225
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 435.7%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 150%
#20

Llama 3.3 70B
Meta AI

$0.000240
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 471.4%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 166.7%
#21

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.000250
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 495.2%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 177.8%
#22

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.000300
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 614.3%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 233.3%
#23

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.000438
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 941.7%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 386.1%
#24

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.000438
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 941.7%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 386.1%
#25

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.000525
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1150%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 483.3%
#26

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.000625
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1388.1%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 594.4%
#27

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.000800
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1804.8%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 788.9%
#28

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.000875
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1983.3%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 872.2%
#29

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.000875
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1983.3%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 872.2%
#30

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.000875
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1983.3%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 872.2%
#31

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.001000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2281%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 1011.1%
#32

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.001000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2281%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 1011.1%
#33

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.001000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2281%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 1011.1%
#34

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.001500
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 3471.4%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 1566.7%
#35

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.002000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 4661.9%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 2122.2%
#36

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.003000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 7042.9%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 3233.3%
#37

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.005250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 12400%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 5733.3%
#38

GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI

$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 14185.7%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 6566.7%
#39

GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI

$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 14185.7%
vs Llama 4 Maverick (400B): ↑ 6566.7%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Generating 50,000 personalized newsletter introductions monthly presents a significant scaling challenge for solo founders, demanding models that offer both high throughput and excellent cost-efficiency. DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick stand out as strong contenders in this domain. DeepSeek V4 Flash, an open-weight MoE model, is lauded for its speed and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for high-volume tasks where every token counts. Its large context window also offers flexibility for more complex personalization prompts. Llama 4 Maverick, another powerful open-weight model, provides strong performance, multimodal capabilities, and a competitive cost-to-performance ratio. It’s designed to handle diverse content generation needs effectively. Founders looking to optimize their AI spend for personalization might weigh DeepSeek V4 Flash’s raw efficiency against Llama 4 Maverick’s advanced capabilities and open-source nature. The choice can hinge on specific personalization requirements, desired output quality, and the value placed on model transparency and flexibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.