Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.001875
Output: $0.001875
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Multimodal Input Details
Resolution: Medium
Tokens: 258,000
Cost: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 250,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.031750 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Output Cost: $0.001875
- Total Cost: $0.022195 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000043
- Tokens per dollar: 23,113,314 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 1,000 tokens per second and 80ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 9 minutes, 9.09 seconds
- Latency: 80 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 1,000 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 935 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.027509 (rounded ~ $0.03) Best Value | ↑ 23.9% more |
| 🥈 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.042765 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 92.7% more |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.066585 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 200% more |
| #4 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.087530 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 294.4% more |
| #5 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.104725 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 371.8% more |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.133170 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 500% more |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.177560 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↑ 700% more |
| #8 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.262590 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↑ 1083.1% more |
| #9 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.437650 (rounded ~ $0.44) | ↑ 1871.8% more |
| #10 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.437650 (rounded ~ $0.44) | ↑ 1871.8% more |
| #11 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.437650 (rounded ~ $0.44) | ↑ 1871.8% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.443900 (rounded ~ $0.44) | ↑ 1900% more |
| #13 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.443900 (rounded ~ $0.44) | ↑ 1900% more |
| #14 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.695240 (rounded ~ $0.70) | ↑ 3032.4% more |
| #15 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.869050 | ↑ 3815.5% more |
| #16 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.869050 | ↑ 3815.5% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$1.738100 (rounded ~ $1.74) | ↑ 7731% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$1.738100 (rounded ~ $1.74) | ↑ 7731% more |
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
For academic researchers embarking on digitizing legacy archives, cost-effectiveness and specialized capabilities are paramount. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers a compelling solution, particularly for those handling smaller batches of scanned documents. Its integrated OCR capabilities mean you can directly process images or PDFs to extract text without needing separate tools. This direct approach streamlines workflows, making it easier to ingest and analyze archival materials. Its low-latency, high-volume optimization makes it suitable for researchers who need quick turnarounds on document processing tasks, ensuring that budget constraints don’t hinder progress on MVP projects. While its primary strength lies in efficiency, its multimodal nature also allows for basic analysis of visual elements within documents, complementing the text extraction process.