o4-mini OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.005500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.005500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Output Cost: $0.005500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.020625
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000196
- Tokens per dollar: 5,090,909 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 180 tokens per second and 280ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 10 minutes, 6.85 seconds
- Latency: 280 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 180 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 173 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for o4-mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to o4-mini| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs o4-mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.001750 Best Value | ↓ 91.5% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.001750 | ↓ 91.5% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
|
$0.005150 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.005313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 74.2% cheaper |
| #5 |
Devstral 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.006625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 67.9% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 64.8% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 64.8% cheaper |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.008750 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 57.6% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 27.3% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.015938 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 22.7% cheaper |
| #11 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 9.1% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.020000 | ↓ 3% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 3% more |
| #14 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 3% more |
| #15 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.030000 | ↑ 45.5% more |
| #16 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.031875 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 54.5% more |
| #17 |
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
|
$0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 63.6% more |
| #18 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.040000 | ↑ 93.9% more |
| #19 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.041563 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 101.5% more |
| #20 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.041563 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 101.5% more |
| #21 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 157.6% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.059375 | ↑ 187.9% more |
| #23 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.060000 | ↑ 190.9% more |
| #24 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 215.2% more |
| #25 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 215.2% more |
| #26 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.085000 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 312.1% more |
| #27 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.100000 | ↑ 384.8% more |
| #28 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.100000 | ↑ 384.8% more |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.100000 | ↑ 384.8% more |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.100000 | ↑ 384.8% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 415.2% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 415.2% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 415.2% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 415.2% more |
| #35 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19) | ↑ 809.1% more |
| #36 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.190625 | ↑ 824.2% more |
| #37 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.190625 | ↑ 824.2% more |
| #38 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.200000 | ↑ 869.7% more |
| #39 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.200000 | ↑ 869.7% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.212500 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 930.3% more |
| #41 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38) | ↑ 1718.2% more |
| #42 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.400000 | ↑ 1839.4% more |
| #43 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.498750 (rounded ~ $0.50) | ↑ 2318.2% more |
| #44 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.498750 (rounded ~ $0.50) | ↑ 2318.2% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Devstral Small 2 Mistral AI
Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Devstral 2 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Magistral Medium Mistral AI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Refining Messy Archival Text
Even the best OCR processes can leave behind artifacts, typos, and structural errors that hinder the educational value of a document. o4-mini is a specialized reasoning model that excels at the complex task of correcting and normalizing messy text extracted from legacy archives. When processing 100,000 tokens of archival data, the model’s ability to ‘think’ through the context of a sentence allows it to make more accurate corrections than standard fast-chat models.
For creators, the qualitative benefit of using a reasoning-focused model like o4-mini lies in its deductive capabilities. If a historical document contains archaic spelling or damaged text, o4-mini can often infer the correct meaning based on the surrounding educational context. This level of logic is particularly useful for building high-quality textbooks or digital libraries where factual precision is non-negotiable. While the model may take more time to process each request compared to non-reasoning counterparts, the reduction in manual proofreading time for the creator is substantial. This makes it an excellent choice for small-scale projects where the goal is to produce professional-grade educational materials from imperfect historical sources.