GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.004500
Output: $0.004500
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)
- Output Cost: $0.004500
- Total Cost: $0.045750 (rounded ~ $0.05)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000453
- Tokens per dollar: 2,207,650 tokens
- Context Window: 400000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 28.24 seconds
- Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 485 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-5.4 mini| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 86.9% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 86.9% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.012200 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| #4 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 72.7% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 66.7% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.019000 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 58.5% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.019000 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 58.5% cheaper |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.029000 | ↓ 36.6% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.030500 | ↓ 33.3% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 1.6% cheaper |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 1.6% cheaper |
| #12 |
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
|
$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 24.6% more |
| #13 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.060000 | ↑ 31.1% more |
| #14 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.071250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 55.7% more |
| #15 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.071250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 55.7% more |
| #16 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.078750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 72.1% more |
| #17 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.078980 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 72.6% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.110250 | ↑ 141% more |
| #19 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.110250 | ↑ 141% more |
| #20 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.115000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 151.4% more |
| #21 |
Grok 4.7
xAI
|
$0.116000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 153.6% more |
| #22 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$0.116000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 153.6% more |
| #23 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$0.116000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 153.6% more |
| #24 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.120000 | ↑ 162.3% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.120000 | ↑ 162.3% more |
| #26 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.120000 | ↑ 162.3% more |
| #27 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.120000 | ↑ 162.3% more |
| #28 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.122000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.122000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #30 |
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
|
$0.127000 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 177.6% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #33 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.180000 | ↑ 293.4% more |
| #34 |
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
|
$0.190500 | ↑ 316.4% more |
| #35 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.230000 | ↑ 402.7% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.240000 | ↑ 424.6% more |
| #37 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.300000 | ↑ 555.7% more |
| #38 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.300000 | ↑ 555.7% more |
| #39 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.300000 | ↑ 555.7% more |
| #40 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.300000 | ↑ 555.7% more |
| #41 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.305000 (rounded ~ $0.31) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.305000 (rounded ~ $0.31) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #43 |
Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta AI
|
$0.420000 | ↑ 818% more |
| #44 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.562500 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 1129.5% more |
| #45 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.562500 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 1129.5% more |
| #46 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.600000 | ↑ 1211.5% more |
| #47 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.600000 | ↑ 1211.5% more |
| #48 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.600000 | ↑ 1211.5% more |
| #49 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$1.323000 (rounded ~ $1.32) | ↑ 2791.8% more |
| #50 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$1.323000 (rounded ~ $1.32) | ↑ 2791.8% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Grok Build 0.1 xAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Grok 4.7 xAI
Grok 4.6 xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
Gemini 4 Argon Google
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Kimi K3.1 Pro Moonshot AI
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Kimi K3 Moonshot AI
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Muse Wonder 1.0 Meta AI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
For internal teams managing a 100K-token knowledge base, cost efficiency is often the priority. GPT-5.4 Mini offers a balanced performance profile, making it a strong contender for high-frequency internal Q&A where you need reliable, fast answers without the overhead of flagship reasoning models. By utilizing this model, developers can maintain responsiveness for employee queries while keeping operational expenses predictable. The model’s context window is well-suited for retrieving and synthesizing information from mid-sized document sets, ensuring that your RAG pipeline remains fast and lean. For teams focused on deploying internal support chatbots that handle routine employee questions—such as HR policies or IT troubleshooting—this model provides excellent value. Its ability to process text efficiently means you can scale your query volume without disproportionately increasing your API spend. We recommend this for teams that prioritize low-latency and cost-effective throughput over the absolute highest-tier reasoning capabilities. Since RAG systems often require consistent, low-latency performance, this model’s lightweight footprint ensures that your infrastructure budget can be allocated to other critical components like vector database indexing and re-ranking pipelines. It is an ideal entry point for developers building their first production-grade internal Q&A system.