Gemini 3.1 Flash Google 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.003000
Output: $0.003000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Multimodal Input Details
Cost: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.107600 (rounded ~ $0.11)
- Output Cost: $0.003000
- Total Cost: $0.091232 (rounded ~ $0.09)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000422
- Tokens per dollar: 2,369,783 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 800 tokens per second and 100ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 4 minutes, 43.94 seconds
- Latency: 100 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 800 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 762 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 2000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.009000
Output: $0.009000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Multimodal Input Details
Cost: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.430400
- Output Cost: $0.009000
- Total Cost: $0.361928 (rounded ~ $0.36)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001674
- Tokens per dollar: 597,356 tokens
- Context Window: 2000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 9 minutes, 27.70 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 381 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.1 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.1 Flash | vs Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.011404 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 87.5% cheaper | ↓ 96.8% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.013860 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 84.8% cheaper | ↓ 96.2% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.055770 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 38.9% cheaper | ↓ 84.6% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.068424 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 25% cheaper | ↓ 81.1% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.228080 (rounded ~ $0.23) | ↑ 150% more | ↓ 37% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.228080 (rounded ~ $0.23) | ↑ 150% more | ↓ 37% cheaper |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Grok 4.3 xAI
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Choosing Between Flash and Pro for Live Meeting Notes
For game studios managing real-time meeting notes, the choice between Gemini 3.1 Flash and Gemini 3.1 Pro often comes down to the balance between immediate latency and analytical depth. Both models natively handle audio input, which is a significant advantage for meeting workflows, allowing you to bypass external transcription services entirely.
Gemini 3.1 Flash is optimized for speed and high-throughput scenarios. If your priority is generating meeting summaries the moment a call ends to provide instant action items for your team, Flash is often the more efficient choice. It excels in responsiveness, making it suitable for live-transcription scenarios where every millisecond counts toward a seamless user experience.
Conversely, Gemini 3.1 Pro is the powerhouse for more complex, nuanced reasoning. If your meetings involve dense, multi-stakeholder technical discussions, project planning, or strategic review, Pro’s advanced reasoning capabilities are superior. It is better at maintaining context over longer, more complex transcripts, ensuring that technical action items are captured accurately and cross-referenced against past project documentation. While the latency is slightly higher, the quality of extraction for complicated, jargon-heavy meeting content is markedly better. For studios, we recommend using Flash for daily stand-ups and Pro for deep-dive production meetings where accuracy in task assignment is critical.