Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.003750
Output: $0.003750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)
- Output Cost: $0.003750
- Total Cost: $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000446
- Tokens per dollar: 2,244,444 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 200ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 51.36 seconds
- Latency: 200 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 437 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Sonnet 4.6| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.001450 Best Value | ↓ 96.8% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.001450 | ↓ 96.8% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.003813 | ↓ 91.5% cheaper |
| #4 |
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
|
$0.004330 | ↓ 90.4% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.004750 | ↓ 89.4% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.004750 | ↓ 89.4% cheaper |
| #7 |
Devstral 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.005725 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 87.3% cheaper |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 83.9% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 74.6% cheaper |
| #11 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.014750 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 67.2% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 66.7% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 66.1% cheaper |
| #14 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 66.1% cheaper |
| #15 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.016225 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 63.9% cheaper |
| #16 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #17 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.022875 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 49.2% cheaper |
| #18 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 38.8% cheaper |
| #19 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 38.8% cheaper |
| #20 |
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 36.1% cheaper |
| #21 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.030000 | ↓ 33.3% cheaper |
| #22 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 15.3% cheaper |
| #23 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.039375 | ↓ 12.5% cheaper |
| #24 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 26.7% more |
| #25 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 26.7% more |
| #26 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.061000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 35.6% more |
| #27 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 66.7% more |
| #28 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 66.7% more |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 66.7% more |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 66.7% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 69.4% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 69.4% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 69.4% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 69.4% more |
| #35 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.140625 | ↑ 212.5% more |
| #36 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.140625 | ↑ 212.5% more |
| #37 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.147500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 227.8% more |
| #38 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.150000 | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #39 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.150000 | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 238.9% more |
| #41 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.295000 (rounded ~ $0.30) | ↑ 555.6% more |
| #42 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.300000 | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #43 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.330750 | ↑ 635% more |
| #44 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.330750 | ↑ 635% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Devstral Small 2 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Devstral 2 Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Magistral Medium Mistral AI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Leveraging Claude Sonnet 4.6 for High-Efficiency Summarization
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has rapidly become a standard for studios looking to maximize quality while keeping operational costs manageable. For meeting summaries where you have already generated a transcript via a separate audio-to-text pipeline, Sonnet 4.6 is an ideal model for processing that text.
The core strength of Sonnet 4.6 lies in its exceptional instruction-following and its ability to handle structured outputs. When you provide it with a long transcript, it is highly reliable at identifying action items, extracting key decisions, and summarizing technical points without hallucinating details. This makes it particularly effective for game development teams who need to turn a 60-minute recorded design sync into a structured Jira task list.
Its recent upgrades have significantly improved its long-context handling, meaning it can ingest multiple related documents—such as previous meeting summaries or technical specs—alongside the current transcript to provide context-aware summaries. This ability to reason across larger datasets makes it more than just a summarization tool; it functions as an automated project secretary. By focusing on Sonnet 4.6 for text-based summarization, studios can achieve a high level of accuracy and consistency, often matching the performance of larger, more expensive models, while maintaining a predictable and optimized budget profile for their daily operational needs.