GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI 1024000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Output: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
- Output Cost: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
- Total Cost: $0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000690
- Tokens per dollar: 1,448,276 tokens
- Context Window: 1024000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 4 minutes, 25.31 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 396 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 Thinking. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-5.4 Thinking| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-5.4 Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.001075 Best Value | ↓ 98.5% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.003625 | ↓ 95% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.005225 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 92.8% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.005225 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 92.8% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 92.6% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.009938 | ↓ 86.3% cheaper |
| #7 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.010875 | ↓ 85% cheaper |
| #8 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.012000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 83.4% cheaper |
| #9 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.013200 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 81.8% cheaper |
| #10 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.013250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 81.7% cheaper |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.014500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 80% cheaper |
| #12 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.014500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 80% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.019875 | ↓ 72.6% cheaper |
| #14 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.021750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 70% cheaper |
| #15 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 63.4% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.029750 | ↓ 59% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.029750 | ↓ 59% cheaper |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.036250 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #19 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.038000 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 47.6% cheaper |
| #20 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.038000 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 47.6% cheaper |
| #21 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.039750 | ↓ 45.2% cheaper |
| #22 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.042500 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 41.4% cheaper |
| #23 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 20% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 8.6% cheaper |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 8.6% cheaper |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 8.6% cheaper |
| #27 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.066250 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 8.6% cheaper |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) | Same price |
| #29 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) | Same price |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) | Same price |
| #31 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.117500 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 62.1% more |
| #32 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.117500 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↑ 62.1% more |
| #33 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.120000 | ↑ 65.5% more |
| #34 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 82.8% more |
| #35 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.132500 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 82.8% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 100% more |
| #37 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.240000 | ↑ 231% more |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.265000 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 265.5% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.357000 (rounded ~ $0.36) | ↑ 392.4% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.357000 (rounded ~ $0.36) | ↑ 392.4% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Parsing 10-K filings involves navigating complex accounting standards, risk disclosures, and massive footnotes. GPT-5.4 Thinking is uniquely positioned for this workload because of its dedicated reasoning-first approach. Unlike models that prioritize fast, reactive responses, GPT-5.4 Thinking is designed to spend computational cycles upfront to plan its approach before attempting complex extraction tasks. For a 100,000-token 10-K document, this means the model can create a structured extraction plan, identifying key tables and narrative summaries before it begins pulling the data into your required output format. This reduces the need for iterative prompting and manual cleanup, which is critical when you are parsing hundreds of filings in a batch.
This model is particularly effective when you have ambiguous or variable filing formats. Because it uses a chain-of-thought approach, it can self-correct when it encounters non-standard reporting structures, leading to more predictable output quality. If your financial analysis pipeline requires high-precision data retrieval—such as pulling exact revenue figures or specific risk categories—the Thinking model’s ability to maintain logical consistency across a 100,000-token context is a major advantage. It treats the extraction task as a multi-step analytical problem rather than a simple pattern-matching exercise, making it a robust choice for heavy-duty, document-intensive financial workflows.