Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 200,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.250000
- Output Cost: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.150000
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000743
- Tokens per dollar: 1,346,667 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 13 minutes, 12.64 seconds
- Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 255 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 2000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 200,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.400000
- Output Cost: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Total Cost: $0.238000 (rounded ~ $0.24)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001178
- Tokens per dollar: 848,739 tokens
- Context Window: 2000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 8 minutes, 35.28 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 392 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Opus 4.7| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Opus 4.7 | vs Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 95.8% cheaper | ↓ 97.4% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 94.9% cheaper | ↓ 96.8% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.009500 | ↓ 93.7% cheaper | ↓ 96% cheaper |
| #4 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.014500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 90.3% cheaper | ↓ 93.9% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.022875 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 84.8% cheaper | ↓ 90.4% cheaper |
| #6 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.030000 | ↓ 80% cheaper | ↓ 87.4% cheaper |
| #7 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.035625 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 76.3% cheaper | ↓ 85% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.045750 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 69.5% cheaper | ↓ 80.8% cheaper |
| #9 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 61.3% cheaper | ↓ 75.6% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.061000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 59.3% cheaper | ↓ 74.4% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.090000 | ↓ 40% cheaper | ↓ 62.2% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.150000 | Same price | ↓ 37% cheaper |
| #13 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.150000 | Same price | ↓ 37% cheaper |
| #14 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 1.7% more | ↓ 35.9% cheaper |
| #15 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 1.7% more | ↓ 35.9% cheaper |
| #16 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 1.7% more | ↓ 35.9% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 1.7% more | ↓ 35.9% cheaper |
| #18 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.238000 (rounded ~ $0.24) | ↑ 58.7% more | Same price |
| #19 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.595000 (rounded ~ $0.60) | ↑ 296.7% more | ↑ 150% more |
| #20 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.595000 (rounded ~ $0.60) | ↑ 296.7% more | ↑ 150% more |
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
Choosing the Right Model for Legal Workflows
In the domain of legal contract review, the choice between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro centers on the balance between nuanced reasoning and expansive context management. Legal teams processing massive portfolios often require models that can hold entire document libraries in active memory without losing coherence.
Claude Opus 4.7 excels in high-stakes clause extraction and redlining. Its architecture is particularly well-tuned for following complex, multi-step instructions, making it ideal for tasks where precision is paramount, such as identifying risky indemnification clauses or comparing drafted language against internal playbooks. For attorneys and compliance officers who demand high-fidelity output for final sign-off, this model provides the logical depth required to navigate dense, jargon-heavy agreements.
Gemini 3.1 Pro, by contrast, shines in scenarios involving extremely long-context document discovery. When you need to cross-reference multiple 50-page agreements, exhibits, and historical amendments simultaneously, its ability to maintain focus over vast context windows is a significant advantage. It is particularly effective for broad-spectrum document analysis where the primary goal is to synthesize information from large, disparate datasets rather than deep-diving into the syntax of a single clause.
Ultimately, the decision rests on the nature of your legal operations. If your priority is deep, surgical analysis of individual contracts, Claude Opus 4.7 is often the preferred path. If your pipeline involves large-scale ingestion and cross-contract retrieval, Gemini 3.1 Pro offers the necessary architectural headroom for comprehensive, enterprise-grade document intelligence.