Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.250000
- Output Cost: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Total Cost: $0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.003186
- Tokens per dollar: 313,846 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 280 tokens per second and 380ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 15.07 seconds
- Latency: 380 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 280 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 262 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.8. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.012000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.012000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.100000
- Output Cost: $0.012000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001314
- Tokens per dollar: 761,194 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 2 minutes, 16.61 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 374 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Opus 4.8| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Opus 4.8 | vs Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.003050 Best Value | ↓ 98.1% cheaper | ↓ 95.4% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 95.7% cheaper | ↓ 89.6% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.008375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 94.8% cheaper | ↓ 87.5% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.010750 | ↓ 93.4% cheaper | ↓ 84% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.010750 | ↓ 93.4% cheaper | ↓ 84% cheaper |
| #6 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 90.6% cheaper | ↓ 77.2% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 89.7% cheaper | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #8 |
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
|
$0.020550 | ↓ 87.4% cheaper | ↓ 69.3% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.024375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 85% cheaper | ↓ 63.6% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.025125 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 84.5% cheaper | ↓ 62.5% cheaper |
| #11 |
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
|
$0.029500 | ↓ 81.8% cheaper | ↓ 56% cheaper |
| #12 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.031500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 80.6% cheaper | ↓ 53% cheaper |
| #13 |
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
|
$0.031788 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 80.4% cheaper | ↓ 52.6% cheaper |
| #14 |
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI
|
$0.031788 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 80.4% cheaper | ↓ 52.6% cheaper |
| #15 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 80% cheaper | ↓ 51.5% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 79.4% cheaper | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #17 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.034650 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 78.7% cheaper | ↓ 48.3% cheaper |
| #18 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.036875 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 77.3% cheaper | ↓ 45% cheaper |
| #19 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.036875 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 77.3% cheaper | ↓ 45% cheaper |
| #20 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 72.7% cheaper | ↓ 33.8% cheaper |
| #21 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 70% cheaper | ↓ 27.2% cheaper |
| #22 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.050250 | ↓ 69.1% cheaper | ↓ 25% cheaper |
| #23 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$0.061000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 62.5% cheaper | ↓ 9% cheaper |
| #24 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$0.061000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 62.5% cheaper | ↓ 9% cheaper |
| #25 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.062125 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 61.8% cheaper | ↓ 7.3% cheaper |
| #26 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.062125 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 61.8% cheaper | ↓ 7.3% cheaper |
| #27 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 60% cheaper | ↓ 3% cheaper |
| #28 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 58.8% cheaper | Same price |
| #29 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 48.5% cheaper | ↑ 25% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 48.5% cheaper | ↑ 25% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 48.5% cheaper | ↑ 25% more |
| #32 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.097500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 40% cheaper | ↑ 45.5% more |
| #33 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | Same price | ↑ 142.5% more |
| #34 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | Same price | ↑ 142.5% more |
| #35 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | Same price | ↑ 142.5% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 3.1% more | ↑ 150% more |
| #37 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 3.1% more | ↑ 150% more |
| #38 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 3.1% more | ↑ 150% more |
| #39 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.306250 (rounded ~ $0.31) | ↑ 88.5% more | ↑ 357.1% more |
| #40 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.306250 (rounded ~ $0.31) | ↑ 88.5% more | ↑ 357.1% more |
| #41 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.315000 (rounded ~ $0.32) | ↑ 93.8% more | ↑ 370.1% more |
| #42 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 385.1% more |
| #43 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 385.1% more |
| #44 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 385.1% more |
| #45 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.630000 | ↑ 287.7% more | ↑ 840.3% more |
| #46 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.745500 (rounded ~ $0.75) | ↑ 358.8% more | ↑ 1012.7% more |
| #47 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.745500 (rounded ~ $0.75) | ↑ 358.8% more | ↑ 1012.7% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Grok Build 0.1 xAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Grok 4.6 xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Choosing the Right Engine for Your Internal RAG
For SaaS founders building internal knowledge base Q&A, the choice between Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 3.1 Pro often comes down to the nature of your documents and the complexity of the reasoning required. Both models operate at the frontier, but they excel in different operational environments.
Claude Opus 4.8 is the standout choice when your internal knowledge base contains highly technical, legal, or dense documentation. It demonstrates exceptional precision in instruction following, ensuring that when an employee asks a question, the model adheres strictly to the provided source material. Its reasoning capabilities make it particularly effective for multi-step tasks where the AI must synthesize information from different departments or disparate policy documents to provide a single, coherent answer.
Gemini 3.1 Pro, conversely, offers a significant advantage when your RAG pipeline requires ingesting massive datasets or multi-modal inputs. Its massive context window allows for holistic understanding of entire repositories of transcripts, video archives, and meeting notes without needing to aggressively chunk your data. This is ideal for organizations where the knowledge base is ‘living’—constantly updated via team communications and recordings rather than static PDF docs.
Ultimately, if your priority is nuanced, highly accurate answers from technical documentation, Claude Opus 4.8 is the reliable partner. If your goal is to map meaning across large-scale, diverse, and unstructured company data, Gemini 3.1 Pro’s architectural design provides a distinct advantage for wide-lens retrieval tasks.