What are cached tokens and how do they save money?

Cached tokens are repeated input tokens (like system prompts or conversation history) that providers charge at a discounted rate. Google offers varying discounts for cached tokens (typically 50-80%). Your calculation saves money by applying caching to 60% of input tokens for optimized cost savings.

When should I use Batch API vs real-time API?

Use Batch API for non-realtime processing of large volumes where latency isn't critical (saves up to 40-60%). Use real-time API for interactive applications like chatbots. Batch processing is ideal for data analysis, content generation in bulk, and offline processing.

What should I consider when comparing different AI models?

When comparing AI models, focus on factors such as performance, accuracy, response speed, cost, scalability, and how well the model fits your specific use case. The right choice depends on your workload, budget, and the type of tasks you want the AI to handle. Using an AI cost and time calculator can help you make an informed, data-driven decision.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7 for 100K-Token Medical Record Summarization

Name: Claude Opus 4.7
Brand: Anthropic
Price: 0.07 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5 (89 reviews)

Claude Opus 4.7 has been replaced by Claude Opus 5

The pricing shown below is for the older model and is kept for reference. If you are choosing a model today, use the current version — its rate and context window differ.

See current Claude Opus 5 pricing → · All recent pricing changes

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7

Complete Comparison: 100,000 input tokens × 1,500 output tokens

⚡ 60% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 60% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API

Comparison Criteria	Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (60% cached)
Input Tokens	100,000	100,000
Output Tokens	1,500	1,500
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost	$0.100000Best	$0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)Worst
Output Cost	$0.009000Best	$0.009375Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR)	$0.000000	$0.000000
Service Fees	$0.000000	$0.000000
Total Cost	$0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06) Best Value	$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07) Most Expensive
Processing Time	4 minutes, 19.01 seconds Fastest	6 minutes, 38.37 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second	400Fastest	260Slowest
Time to First Token	220ms Best	400ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens	$0.000542Best	$0.000659Worst
Tokens per Dollar	1,845,455Best Value	1,517,757Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base)	$1.000000Best	$1.250000Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base)	$6.000000Best	$6.250000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.500000Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.625000 (rounded ~ $0.63)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$3.000000Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$3.125000 (rounded ~ $3.13)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Video Support	✓ Supported	✗ Not Supported
Audio Support	✓ Supported	✗ Not Supported
Caching Support 60	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Batch API Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported

Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Provider

Model

Second Model

Provider

Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 1000000

$0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

Total Cost

⚡ 60% Cached 📊 Batch API

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✓ Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✓ Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.109000 Input: $0.100000
Output: $0.009000

Optimized Cost $0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06) Input: $0.100000
Output: $0.009000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.054000 (rounded ~ $0.05) 49.5% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

📊 Dynamic Tier

Standard

tier1 pricing based on 0 tokens

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.100000
Output Cost: $0.009000
Total Cost: $0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000542
Tokens per dollar: 1,845,455 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 4 minutes, 19.01 seconds
Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 392 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Multimodal medical document summarization (Gemini) vs complex clinical reasoning and synthesis (Claude).

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000

$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)

Total Cost

⚡ 60% Cached 📊 Batch API

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.134375 (rounded ~ $0.13) Input: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
Output: $0.009375

Optimized Cost $0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07) Input: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
Output: $0.009375
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07) 50.2% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
Output Cost: $0.009375
Total Cost: $0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000659
Tokens per dollar: 1,517,757 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 6 minutes, 38.37 seconds
Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 255 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Multimodal medical document summarization (Gemini) vs complex clinical reasoning and synthesis (Claude).

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Gemini 3.1 Pro

📋 Active Input Parameters

Input Tokens: 100,000

Output Tokens: 1,500

Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)

Cached Tokens: 60%

Rank	AI Model & Provider	Total Cost	vs Gemini 3.1 Pro	vs Claude Opus 4.7
🏆	Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI	$0.001263 Best Value	↓ 97.7% cheaper	↓ 98.1% cheaper
🥈	Devstral Small 2 Mistral AI	$0.001263	↓ 97.7% cheaper	↓ 98.1% cheaper
🥉	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google	$0.003438	↓ 93.8% cheaper	↓ 94.9% cheaper
#4	Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA	$0.003758	↓ 93.2% cheaper	↓ 94.4% cheaper
#5	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google	$0.004388	↓ 92% cheaper	↓ 93.4% cheaper
#6	Gemini 2.5 Flash Google	$0.004388	↓ 92% cheaper	↓ 93.4% cheaper
#7	Devstral 2 Mistral AI	$0.004938	↓ 91% cheaper	↓ 92.6% cheaper
#8	Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI	$0.006313 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 88.5% cheaper	↓ 90.6% cheaper
#9	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	$0.010031	↓ 81.8% cheaper	↓ 85% cheaper
#10	GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI	$0.010313	↓ 81.3% cheaper	↓ 84.6% cheaper
#11	o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI	$0.013000 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 76.4% cheaper	↓ 80.6% cheaper
#12	Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic	$0.013375 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 75.7% cheaper	↓ 80% cheaper
#13	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google	$0.013750 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 75% cheaper	↓ 79.4% cheaper
#14	GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI	$0.013750 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 75% cheaper	↓ 79.4% cheaper
#15	o4-mini OpenAI	$0.014300 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 74% cheaper	↓ 78.6% cheaper
#16	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google	$0.020063	↓ 63.5% cheaper	↓ 70% cheaper
#17	Gemini 3.5 Flash Google	$0.020625	↓ 62.5% cheaper	↓ 69.2% cheaper
#18	Magistral Medium Mistral AI	$0.024875 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 54.8% cheaper	↓ 62.8% cheaper
#19	GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI	$0.025375 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 53.9% cheaper	↓ 62.1% cheaper
#20	GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI	$0.025375 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 53.9% cheaper	↓ 62.1% cheaper
#21	Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic	$0.026750 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 51.4% cheaper	↓ 60% cheaper
#22	GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI	$0.034375 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 37.5% cheaper	↓ 48.6% cheaper
#23	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	$0.036250 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↓ 34.1% cheaper	↓ 45.8% cheaper
#24	Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	$0.040125	↓ 27% cheaper	↓ 40% cheaper
#25	Grok 4.3 xAI	$0.049000	↓ 10.9% cheaper	↓ 26.7% cheaper
#26	Grok 4.20 Beta xAI	$0.049000	↓ 10.9% cheaper	↓ 26.7% cheaper
#27	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic	$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 21.6% more	Same price
#28	Claude Opus 5 Anthropic	$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 21.6% more	Same price
#29	Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 21.6% more	Same price
#30	Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 21.6% more	Same price
#31	GPT-5.4 OpenAI	$0.068750 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 25% more	↑ 2.8% more
#32	GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI	$0.068750 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 25% more	↑ 2.8% more
#33	GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI	$0.068750 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 25% more	↑ 2.8% more
#34	GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI	$0.068750 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 25% more	↑ 2.8% more
#35	Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic	$0.122500 (rounded ~ $0.12)	↑ 122.7% more	↑ 83.2% more
#36	Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic	$0.122500 (rounded ~ $0.12)	↑ 122.7% more	↑ 83.2% more
#37	o3 Deep Research OpenAI	$0.130000	↑ 136.4% more	↑ 94.4% more
#38	Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	$0.133750 (rounded ~ $0.13)	↑ 143.2% more	↑ 100% more
#39	Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	$0.133750 (rounded ~ $0.13)	↑ 143.2% more	↑ 100% more
#40	GPT-5.5 OpenAI	$0.137500 (rounded ~ $0.14)	↑ 150% more	↑ 105.6% more
#41	o3 Pro OpenAI	$0.260000	↑ 372.7% more	↑ 288.8% more
#42	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$0.267500 (rounded ~ $0.27)	↑ 386.4% more	↑ 300% more
#43	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.304500 (rounded ~ $0.30)	↑ 453.6% more	↑ 355.3% more
#44	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.304500 (rounded ~ $0.30)	↑ 453.6% more	↑ 355.3% more

🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.001263

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 97.7%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 98.1%

🥈

Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI

$0.001263

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 97.7%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 98.1%

🥉

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.003438

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 93.8%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 94.9%

Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA

$0.003758

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 93.2%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 94.4%

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.004388

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 92%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 93.4%

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.004388

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 92%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 93.4%

Devstral 2
Mistral AI

$0.004938

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 91%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 92.6%

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.006313 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 88.5%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 90.6%

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.010031

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 81.8%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 85%

#10

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.010313

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 81.3%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 84.6%

#11

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.013000 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 76.4%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 80.6%

#12

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.013375 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 75.7%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 80%

#13

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.013750 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 75%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 79.4%

#14

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.013750 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 75%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 79.4%

#15

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.014300 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 74%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 78.6%

#16

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.020063

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 63.5%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 70%

#17

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.020625

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 62.5%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 69.2%

#18

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI

$0.024875 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 54.8%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 62.8%

#19

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.025375 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 53.9%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 62.1%

#20

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.025375 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 53.9%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 62.1%

#21

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.026750 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 51.4%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 60%

#22

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.034375 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 37.5%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 48.6%

#23

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.036250 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 34.1%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 45.8%

#24

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.040125

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 27%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 40%

#25

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.049000

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 10.9%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 26.7%

#26

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.049000

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↓ 10.9%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 26.7%

#27

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 21.6%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same

#28

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 21.6%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same

#29

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 21.6%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same

#30

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.066875 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 21.6%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same

#31

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.068750 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 25%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 2.8%

#32

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.068750 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 25%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 2.8%

#33

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.068750 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 25%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 2.8%

#34

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.068750 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 25%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 2.8%

#35

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.122500 (rounded ~ $0.12)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 122.7%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 83.2%

#36

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.122500 (rounded ~ $0.12)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 122.7%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 83.2%

#37

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.130000

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 136.4%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 94.4%

#38

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.133750 (rounded ~ $0.13)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 143.2%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 100%

#39

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.133750 (rounded ~ $0.13)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 143.2%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 100%

#40

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.137500 (rounded ~ $0.14)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 150%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 105.6%

#41

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.260000

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 372.7%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 288.8%

#42

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.267500 (rounded ~ $0.27)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 386.4%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 300%

#43

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.304500 (rounded ~ $0.30)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 453.6%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 355.3%

#44

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.304500 (rounded ~ $0.30)

vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: ↑ 453.6%

vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 355.3%

✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Selecting the Right Model for Clinical Summarization

Choosing between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.7 for 100K-token medical record summarization requires a careful look at how these models handle multimodal data and dense, structured reasoning. Both models serve as industry standards, yet they offer distinct advantages for healthcare operations teams aiming to automate documentation.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is a compelling choice when your clinical workflow involves multimodal data. If your medical record summarization includes processing scanned clinical charts, handwritten physician notes, or diagnostic imagery alongside text, Gemini’s native multimodal capabilities provide a significant advantage. It is optimized for extracting insights from dense, schema-rich documents, making it highly effective for summarizing patient histories that span multiple formats and sources. For support leads, this means less time spent manually preparing data before sending it to the model.

On the other hand, Claude Opus 4.7 excels in environments where the priority is complex linguistic reasoning and structural nuance. If your clinical notes require high-level synthesis of medical literature or complex differential diagnosis generation, Claude Opus 4.7 often demonstrates a superior grasp of interpretive intent. It is frequently preferred for tasks that require a precise, scholarly tone or deep synthesis of lengthy, non-visual documentation. While both models handle long-context windows efficiently, the decision often comes down to your integration needs: Gemini’s strength in multimodal extraction versus Claude’s edge in interpretive synthesis. For mid-market healthcare companies, testing both against a sample of your actual EHR data is the recommended path to ensuring the chosen model aligns with your specific documentation style and clinical standard.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?

Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.

How does prompt caching work?

Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.

How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?

Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.

What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?

The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7 for 100K-Token Medical Record Summarization

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Second Model

Select AI Model

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Calculate Token Costs

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

Model Comparison

Model Information

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

Devstral Small 2 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

Devstral 2 Mistral AI

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

o4-mini OpenAI

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

Grok 4.3 xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta xAI

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic

o3 Deep Research OpenAI

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

o3 Pro OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

Selecting the Right Model for Clinical Summarization

Frequently Asked Questions

Related model pricing

Compare across providers

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

Devstral 2
Mistral AI

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

o4-mini
OpenAI

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

Grok 4.3
xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

o3 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI