Long-Form Script Production: Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 for 100K-Token Monthly Pipelines

Claude Opus 4.7 has been replaced by Claude Opus 5

The pricing shown below is for the older model and is kept for reference. If you are choosing a model today, use the current version — its rate and context window differ.

See current Claude Opus 5 pricing →  ·  All recent pricing changes

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4
Complete Comparison: 100,000 input tokens × 8,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models .

Comparison Criteria Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs)
Input Tokens 100,000 100,000
Output Tokens 8,000 8,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.500000Worst $0.250000Best
Output Cost $0.200000Worst $0.120000Best
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.700000 Most Expensive $0.370000 Best Value
Processing Time 7 minutes, 24.64 seconds Slowest 4 minutes, 35.32 seconds Fastest
Tokens per Second 260Slowest 420Fastest
Time to First Token 400ms Worst 210ms Best
Cost per 1K tokens $0.006481 (rounded ~ $0.01)Worst $0.003426Best
Tokens per Dollar 154,286Worst Value 291,892Best Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $5.000000Worst $2.500000Best
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $25.000000Worst $15.000000Best
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $5.000000Worst
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
$2.500000Best
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $25.000000Worst
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
$15.000000Best
Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Caching Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Opus 4.7
AnthropicMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$5 / $25 per 1M tokens
▼
▼
Use Batch API (50% discount)
0%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.700000 Total Cost
$0.500000 Input Cost
$0.200000 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
108,000Total Tokens
$0.006481Cost per 1K
154,286Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

7m 24s Processing Time
260 Tokens/Second
400ms Time to First Token
243 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after
🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)
🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier
📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited
🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000

$0.700000
Total Cost
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.700000 Input: $0.500000
Output: $0.200000
Optimized Cost $0.700000 Input: $0.500000
Output: $0.200000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 8,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.500000
  • Output Cost: $0.200000
  • Total Cost: $0.700000
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.006481 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Tokens per dollar: 154,286 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 7 minutes, 24.64 seconds
  • Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 243 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Best for high-fidelitylong-form creative content requiring narrative consistency and complex structural adherence.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

GPT-5.4 OpenAI 1024000

$0.370000
Total Cost
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.370000 Input: $0.250000
Output: $0.120000
Optimized Cost $0.370000 Input: $0.250000
Output: $0.120000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 8,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.250000
  • Output Cost: $0.120000
  • Total Cost: $0.370000
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.003426
  • Tokens per dollar: 291,892 tokens
  • Context Window: 1024000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 420 tokens per second and 210ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 4 minutes, 35.32 seconds
  • Latency: 210 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 420 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 393 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Best for high-fidelitylong-form creative content requiring narrative consistency and complex structural adherence.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Opus 4.7
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 100,000
Output Tokens: 8,000
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4
🏆 Llama 4 Scout
Meta AI
 $0.010400 Best Value ↓ 98.5% cheaper ↓ 97.2% cheaper
🥈 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
 $0.012400 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 98.2% cheaper ↓ 96.6% cheaper
🥉 Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
 $0.012400 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 98.2% cheaper ↓ 96.6% cheaper
#4 DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek
 $0.016240 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 97.7% cheaper ↓ 95.6% cheaper
#5 Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AI
 $0.019800 ↓ 97.2% cheaper ↓ 94.6% cheaper
#6 Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
 $0.032000 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 95.4% cheaper ↓ 91.4% cheaper
#7 Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
 $0.036560 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↓ 94.8% cheaper ↓ 90.1% cheaper
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.037000 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↓ 94.7% cheaper ↓ 90% cheaper
#9 Devstral 2
Mistral AI
 $0.047200 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↓ 93.3% cheaper ↓ 87.2% cheaper
#10 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
 $0.050000 ↓ 92.9% cheaper ↓ 86.5% cheaper
#11 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.050000 ↓ 92.9% cheaper ↓ 86.5% cheaper
#12 DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek
 $0.050460 ↓ 92.8% cheaper ↓ 86.4% cheaper
#13 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.062000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↓ 91.1% cheaper ↓ 83.2% cheaper
#14 Llama 3.3 70B
Meta AI
 $0.069600 ↓ 90.1% cheaper ↓ 81.2% cheaper
#15 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.074000 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↓ 89.4% cheaper ↓ 80% cheaper
#16 Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
 $0.084000 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↓ 88% cheaper ↓ 77.3% cheaper
#17 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
 $0.105000 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↓ 85% cheaper ↓ 71.6% cheaper
#18 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
 $0.111000 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↓ 84.1% cheaper ↓ 70% cheaper
#19 Grok Build 0.1
xAI
 $0.116000 (rounded ~ $0.12) ↓ 83.4% cheaper ↓ 68.6% cheaper
#20 Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
 $0.127000 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↓ 81.9% cheaper ↓ 65.7% cheaper
#21 Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI
 $0.127000 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↓ 81.9% cheaper ↓ 65.7% cheaper
#22 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.132000 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↓ 81.1% cheaper ↓ 64.3% cheaper
#23 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.140000 ↓ 80% cheaper ↓ 62.2% cheaper
#24 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↓ 79.3% cheaper ↓ 60.8% cheaper
#25 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↓ 79.3% cheaper ↓ 60.8% cheaper
#26 o4-mini
OpenAI
 $0.145200 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↓ 79.3% cheaper ↓ 60.8% cheaper
#27 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
 $0.148000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↓ 78.9% cheaper ↓ 60% cheaper
#28 Muse Spark 1.3
Meta AI
 $0.159000 (rounded ~ $0.16) ↓ 77.3% cheaper ↓ 57% cheaper
#29 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.205000 (rounded ~ $0.21) ↓ 70.7% cheaper ↓ 44.6% cheaper
#30 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
 $0.210000 ↓ 70% cheaper ↓ 43.2% cheaper
#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
 $0.222000 (rounded ~ $0.22) ↓ 68.3% cheaper ↓ 40% cheaper
#32 Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
 $0.240000 ↓ 65.7% cheaper ↓ 35.1% cheaper
#33 Grok 4.6
xAI
 $0.248000 (rounded ~ $0.25) ↓ 64.6% cheaper ↓ 33% cheaper
#34 Grok 4.5
xAI
 $0.248000 (rounded ~ $0.25) ↓ 64.6% cheaper ↓ 33% cheaper
#35 Sonar Deep Research
Perplexity
 $0.264000 (rounded ~ $0.26) ↓ 62.3% cheaper ↓ 28.6% cheaper
#36 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
 $0.280000 ↓ 60% cheaper ↓ 24.3% cheaper
#37 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
 $0.287000 (rounded ~ $0.29) ↓ 59% cheaper ↓ 22.4% cheaper
#38 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.287000 (rounded ~ $0.29) ↓ 59% cheaper ↓ 22.4% cheaper
#39 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.296000 (rounded ~ $0.30) ↓ 57.7% cheaper ↓ 20% cheaper
#40 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.370000 ↓ 47.1% cheaper Same price
#41 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.370000 ↓ 47.1% cheaper Same price
#42 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
 $0.370000 ↓ 47.1% cheaper Same price
#43 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.420000 ↓ 40% cheaper ↑ 13.5% more
#44 Sonar Pro
Perplexity
 $0.430000 ↓ 38.6% cheaper ↑ 16.2% more
#45 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
 $0.700000 Same price ↑ 89.2% more
#46 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.700000 Same price ↑ 89.2% more
#47 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.700000 Same price ↑ 89.2% more
#48 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.740000 ↑ 5.7% more ↑ 100% more
#49 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.740000 ↑ 5.7% more ↑ 100% more
#50 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.740000 ↑ 5.7% more ↑ 100% more
#51 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
 $1.320000 ↑ 88.6% more ↑ 256.8% more
#52 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
 $1.400000 ↑ 100% more ↑ 278.4% more
#53 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
 $1.400000 ↑ 100% more ↑ 278.4% more
#54 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
 $1.400000 ↑ 100% more ↑ 278.4% more
#55 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
 $1.400000 ↑ 100% more ↑ 278.4% more
#56 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $1.400000 ↑ 100% more ↑ 278.4% more
#57 o3 Pro
OpenAI
 $2.640000 ↑ 277.1% more ↑ 613.5% more
#58 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $3.444000 (rounded ~ $3.44) ↑ 392% more ↑ 830.8% more
#59 GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
 $4.440000 ↑ 534.3% more ↑ 1100% more
#60 GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
 $4.440000 ↑ 534.3% more ↑ 1100% more
🏆

Llama 4 Scout
Meta AI

$0.010400
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 98.5%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 97.2%
🥈

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.012400 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 98.2%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 96.6%
🥉

Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI

$0.012400 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 98.2%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 96.6%
#4

DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek

$0.016240 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 97.7%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 95.6%
#5

Llama 4 Maverick (400B)
Meta AI

$0.019800
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 97.2%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 94.6%
#6

Grok Code Fast 1
xAI

$0.032000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 95.4%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 91.4%
#7

Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA

$0.036560 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 94.8%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 90.1%
#8

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.037000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 94.7%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 90%
#9

Devstral 2
Mistral AI

$0.047200 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 93.3%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 87.2%
#10

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.050000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 92.9%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 86.5%
#11

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.050000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 92.9%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 86.5%
#12

DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek

$0.050460
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 92.8%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 86.4%
#13

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.062000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 91.1%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 83.2%
#14

Llama 3.3 70B
Meta AI

$0.069600
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 90.1%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 81.2%
#15

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.074000 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 89.4%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 80%
#16

Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI

$0.084000 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 88%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 77.3%
#17

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.105000 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 85%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 71.6%
#18

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.111000 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 84.1%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 70%
#19

Grok Build 0.1
xAI

$0.116000 (rounded ~ $0.12)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 83.4%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 68.6%
#20

Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI

$0.127000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 81.9%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 65.7%
#21

Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI

$0.127000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 81.9%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 65.7%
#22

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.132000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 81.1%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 64.3%
#23

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.140000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 80%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 62.2%
#24

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 79.3%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 60.8%
#25

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 79.3%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 60.8%
#26

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.145200 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 79.3%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 60.8%
#27

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.148000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 78.9%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 60%
#28

Muse Spark 1.3
Meta AI

$0.159000 (rounded ~ $0.16)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 77.3%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 57%
#29

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.205000 (rounded ~ $0.21)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 70.7%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 44.6%
#30

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.210000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 70%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 43.2%
#31

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.222000 (rounded ~ $0.22)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 68.3%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 40%
#32

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI

$0.240000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 65.7%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 35.1%
#33

Grok 4.6
xAI

$0.248000 (rounded ~ $0.25)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 64.6%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 33%
#34

Grok 4.5
xAI

$0.248000 (rounded ~ $0.25)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 64.6%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 33%
#35

Sonar Deep Research
Perplexity

$0.264000 (rounded ~ $0.26)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 62.3%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 28.6%
#36

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.280000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 60%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 24.3%
#37

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.287000 (rounded ~ $0.29)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 59%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 22.4%
#38

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.287000 (rounded ~ $0.29)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 59%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 22.4%
#39

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.296000 (rounded ~ $0.30)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 57.7%
vs GPT-5.4: ↓ 20%
#40

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.370000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 47.1%
vs GPT-5.4: Same
#41

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.370000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 47.1%
vs GPT-5.4: Same
#42

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.370000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 47.1%
vs GPT-5.4: Same
#43

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.420000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 40%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 13.5%
#44

Sonar Pro
Perplexity

$0.430000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 38.6%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 16.2%
#45

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.700000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 89.2%
#46

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.700000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 89.2%
#47

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.700000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 89.2%
#48

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.740000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 5.7%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 100%
#49

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.740000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 5.7%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 100%
#50

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.740000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 5.7%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 100%
#51

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$1.320000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 88.6%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 256.8%
#52

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$1.400000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 100%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 278.4%
#53

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$1.400000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 100%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 278.4%
#54

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$1.400000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 100%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 278.4%
#55

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$1.400000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 100%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 278.4%
#56

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$1.400000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 100%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 278.4%
#57

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$2.640000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 277.1%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 613.5%
#58

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$3.444000 (rounded ~ $3.44)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 392%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 830.8%
#59

GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI

$4.440000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 534.3%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 1100%
#60

GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI

$4.440000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 534.3%
vs GPT-5.4: ↑ 1100%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Choosing Your Creative Engine

For customer support leads and content strategists tasked with producing 4 long-form video scripts per week, the choice between Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 often comes down to the specific nature of your creative workflow. Both models are highly capable, but they offer distinct advantages for high-volume script generation where narrative consistency and brand voice are paramount.

Claude Opus 4.7 excels in scenarios requiring strict adherence to complex formatting and long-form narrative coherence. If your video scripts follow rigid structures—such as technical explainers, compliance-heavy educational content, or multi-step tutorial guides—Claude’s ability to maintain instruction fidelity over lengthy sequences is an asset. It tends to handle nuanced, multi-part prompt constraints with higher consistency, which reduces the need for manual copy-editing during your review cycles.

GPT-5.4 often provides a competitive edge when the goal is rapid iteration and creative brainstorming. Its versatility makes it an excellent choice for teams that need to explore diverse angles, varied tones, or snappy, engaging hooks for social media content. If your script production pipeline involves frequent pivots or requires a more conversational, spontaneous flair, GPT-5.4’s responsiveness to creative prompts can help your team move from initial concept to draft faster.

Ultimately, your decision should align with your team’s specific bottleneck. Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if your priority is instructional precision and complex structure. Lean into GPT-5.4 if your priority is creative velocity and adapting to fast-changing audience trends. Regardless of the model, building a robust human-in-the-loop review process remains the best strategy for maintaining brand safety at scale.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Related model pricing

Claude Opus 4.7 currently costs $5.00 / $25.00 per 1M tokens. These are the models worth pricing against it, taken live from the tracked registry.

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

See every tracked AI pricing change →