Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 1,000,000 input tokens and 3,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $1.250000
- Output Cost: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Total Cost: $1.043750 (rounded ~ $1.04)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001041
- Tokens per dollar: 960,958 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 1 hour, 7 minutes, 30.76 seconds
- Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 248 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.027000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.027000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 1,000,000 input tokens and 3,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $2.000000
- Output Cost: $0.027000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Total Cost: $1.667000 (rounded ~ $1.67)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001662
- Tokens per dollar: 601,680 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 43 minutes, 53.05 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 381 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Opus 4.7| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Opus 4.7 | vs Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.063375 (rounded ~ $0.06) Best Value | ↓ 93.9% cheaper | ↓ 96.2% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.156563 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↓ 85% cheaper | ↓ 90.6% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.313125 (rounded ~ $0.31) | ↓ 70% cheaper | ↓ 81.2% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$1.047500 (rounded ~ $1.05) | ↑ 0.4% more | ↓ 37.2% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$2.083750 (rounded ~ $2.08) | ↑ 99.6% more | ↑ 25% more |
| #6 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$2.083750 (rounded ~ $2.08) | ↑ 99.6% more | ↑ 25% more |
| #7 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$8.350000 | ↑ 700% more | ↑ 400.9% more |
| #8 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$8.350000 | ↑ 700% more | ↑ 400.9% more |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
Choosing between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro for legal review depends on the specific nature of your contracts and the complexity of the desired output. Claude Opus 4.7 is widely regarded for its exceptional reasoning depth and reliability in interpreting dense, multi-file documentation. If your workflow involves complex cross-referencing between a 50-page master service agreement and multiple smaller statements of work, Claude’s structural awareness ensures that definitions and obligations are tracked consistently across the entire context window. It is the preferred choice for tasks requiring high-precision compliance checks and nuanced policy interpretation where hallucination risks must be kept to an absolute minimum.
Gemini 3.1 Pro, conversely, offers a distinct advantage when your legal documents contain heavy visual elements such as organizational charts, process flow diagrams, or handwritten annotations. Its native multimodal capabilities allow it to bridge the gap between text and imagery without requiring a separate pre-processing OCR step. For indie developers building tools to synthesize entire libraries of legal filings or complex case studies, Gemini’s deep integration and speed with multimodal data make it a highly efficient partner. While both models handle long-context inputs effectively, the decision hinges on whether your priority is pure, deep-logic synthesis (Claude) or the ability to natively ingest and reason across diverse, visually complex document formats (Gemini).