Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5 for 200K-Token Multi-Agent Orchestration

Claude Opus 4.7 has been replaced by Claude Opus 5

The pricing shown below is for the older model and is kept for reference. If you are choosing a model today, use the current version — its rate and context window differ.

See current Claude Opus 5 pricing →  ·  All recent pricing changes

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5
Complete Comparison: 200,000 input tokens × 1,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens 200,000 200,000
Output Tokens 1,000 1,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.250000Best $1.000000Worst
Output Cost $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)Best $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) Best Value $0.572500 (rounded ~ $0.57) Most Expensive
Processing Time 13 minutes, 47.37 seconds Slowest 8 minutes, 32.25 seconds Fastest
Tokens per Second 260Slowest 420Fastest
Time to First Token 400ms Worst 210ms Best
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000715Best $0.002848Worst
Tokens per Dollar 1,398,261Best Value 351,092Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $1.250000Best $5.000000Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $6.250000Best $22.500000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.625000 (rounded ~ $0.63)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$2.500000Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $3.125000 (rounded ~ $3.13)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$11.250000Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Caching Support
50
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Opus 4.7
AnthropicMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$5 / $25 per 1M tokens
▼
▼
Use Batch API (50% discount)
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.143750 Total Cost
$0.125000 Input Cost
$0.006250 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
201,000Total Tokens
$0.000715Cost per 1K
1,398,261Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

13m 47s Processing Time
260 Tokens/Second
400ms Time to First Token
243 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after
🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)
🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier
📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited
🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000

$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.256250 (rounded ~ $0.26) Input: $0.250000
Output: $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Optimized Cost $0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) Input: $0.250000
Output: $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.112500 (rounded ~ $0.11) 43.9% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 200,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.250000
  • Output Cost: $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Total Cost: $0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000715
  • Tokens per dollar: 1,398,261 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 13 minutes, 47.37 seconds
  • Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 243 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 for complexlogic-heavy reasoning tasks; use GPT-5.5 for robust tool execution and backend integration.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

GPT-5.5 OpenAI 1000000 🏔️ Context Cliff

$0.572500 (rounded ~ $0.57)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $1.022500 (rounded ~ $1.02) Input: $1.000000
Output: $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Optimized Cost $0.572500 (rounded ~ $0.57) Input: $1.000000
Output: $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.450000 44.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount
🏔️ Context Cliff
Premium Tier
>272,000 tokens triggered premium pricing
📊 Cliff Pricing
Premium
premium pricing (threshold: 272,000)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 200,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $1.000000
  • Output Cost: $0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
  • Total Cost: $0.572500 (rounded ~ $0.57)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.002848
  • Tokens per dollar: 351,092 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 420 tokens per second and 210ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 8 minutes, 32.25 seconds
  • Latency: 210 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 420 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 393 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 for complexlogic-heavy reasoning tasks; use GPT-5.5 for robust tool execution and backend integration.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Opus 4.7
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 200,000
Output Tokens: 1,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5
🏆 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value ↓ 95% cheaper ↓ 98.7% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
 $0.008875 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 93.8% cheaper ↓ 98.4% cheaper
🥉 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.008875 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 93.8% cheaper ↓ 98.4% cheaper
#4 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.014125 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 90.2% cheaper ↓ 97.5% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
 $0.021563 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 85% cheaper ↓ 96.2% cheaper
#6 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
 $0.021750 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 84.9% cheaper ↓ 96.2% cheaper
#7 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 80% cheaper ↓ 95% cheaper
#8 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
 $0.029000 ↓ 79.8% cheaper ↓ 94.9% cheaper
#9 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
 $0.043125 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↓ 70% cheaper ↓ 92.5% cheaper
#10 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
 $0.043500 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↓ 69.7% cheaper ↓ 92.4% cheaper
#11 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
 $0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↓ 60% cheaper ↓ 90% cheaper
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↓ 59.7% cheaper ↓ 89.9% cheaper
#13 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
 $0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↓ 49.6% cheaper ↓ 87.3% cheaper
#14 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.086250 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↓ 40% cheaper ↓ 84.9% cheaper
#15 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
 $0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) Same price ↓ 74.9% cheaper
#16 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) Same price ↓ 74.9% cheaper
#17 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14) Same price ↓ 74.9% cheaper
#18 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 0.9% more ↓ 74.7% cheaper
#19 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 0.9% more ↓ 74.7% cheaper
#20 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 0.9% more ↓ 74.7% cheaper
#21 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 0.9% more ↓ 74.7% cheaper
#22 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15) ↑ 0.9% more ↓ 74.7% cheaper
#23 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.224000 (rounded ~ $0.22) ↑ 55.8% more ↓ 60.9% cheaper
#24 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.224000 (rounded ~ $0.22) ↑ 55.8% more ↓ 60.9% cheaper
#25 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.229000 (rounded ~ $0.23) ↑ 59.3% more ↓ 60% cheaper
#26 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.268750 (rounded ~ $0.27) ↑ 87% more ↓ 53.1% cheaper
#27 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.268750 (rounded ~ $0.27) ↑ 87% more ↓ 53.1% cheaper
#28 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
 $0.287500 (rounded ~ $0.29) ↑ 100% more ↓ 49.8% cheaper
#29 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
 $0.287500 (rounded ~ $0.29) ↑ 100% more ↓ 49.8% cheaper
#30 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.572500 (rounded ~ $0.57) ↑ 298.3% more Same price
#31 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $1.150000 ↑ 700% more ↑ 100.9% more
#32 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $1.150000 ↑ 700% more ↑ 100.9% more
🏆

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 95%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 98.7%
🥈

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.008875 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 93.8%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 98.4%
🥉

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.008875 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 93.8%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 98.4%
#4

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.014125 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 90.2%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 97.5%
#5

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.021563 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 85%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 96.2%
#6

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.021750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 84.9%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 96.2%
#7

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 80%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 95%
#8

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.029000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 79.8%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 94.9%
#9

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.043125 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 70%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 92.5%
#10

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.043500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 69.7%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 92.4%
#11

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 60%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 90%
#12

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.058000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 59.7%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 89.9%
#13

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.072500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 49.6%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 87.3%
#14

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.086250 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↓ 40%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 84.9%
#15

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 74.9%
#16

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 74.9%
#17

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.143750 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: Same
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 74.9%
#18

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 0.9%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 74.7%
#19

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 0.9%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 74.7%
#20

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 0.9%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 74.7%
#21

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 0.9%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 74.7%
#22

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.145000 (rounded ~ $0.15)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 0.9%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 74.7%
#23

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.224000 (rounded ~ $0.22)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 55.8%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 60.9%
#24

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.224000 (rounded ~ $0.22)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 55.8%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 60.9%
#25

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.229000 (rounded ~ $0.23)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 59.3%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 60%
#26

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.268750 (rounded ~ $0.27)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 87%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 53.1%
#27

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.268750 (rounded ~ $0.27)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 87%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 53.1%
#28

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.287500 (rounded ~ $0.29)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 100%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 49.8%
#29

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.287500 (rounded ~ $0.29)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 100%
vs GPT-5.5: ↓ 49.8%
#30

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.572500 (rounded ~ $0.57)
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 298.3%
vs GPT-5.5: Same
#31

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$1.150000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 700%
vs GPT-5.5: ↑ 100.9%
#32

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$1.150000
vs Claude Opus 4.7: ↑ 700%
vs GPT-5.5: ↑ 100.9%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

When building multi-agent systems, the orchestrator model serves as the central brain, managing task decomposition, state tracking, and error recovery. Claude Opus 4.7 is often favored for its highly nuanced instruction following and its ability to maintain logical consistency over long, complex chains of thought. In a 200,000-token orchestration session, this stability is vital, as the model must keep track of various sub-agent outputs without drifting. Its architectural reliability makes it an excellent candidate for complex, high-accuracy workflows where worker agents depend on precise, consistent directives.

GPT-5.5, conversely, offers a mature ecosystem with highly optimized tool-calling capabilities. For mobile developers, this often translates to faster, more robust integration with existing backend infrastructures and third-party APIs. Its reasoning capabilities are expansive, making it well-suited for standardizing the outputs of worker agents in high-volume environments. Choosing between these models often comes down to the trade-off between the high-fidelity, creative reasoning of Claude and the operational stability of the OpenAI stack. If your multi-agent tasks involve heavy internal logic and complex branching, Opus provides a slight edge in reasoning depth. If your architecture relies heavily on reliable function execution and rapid ecosystem integration, GPT-5.5 is often the pragmatic choice. Both models handle the massive context windows required for intricate agent sessions, but consider your team’s familiarity with the respective platform’s developer tooling before finalizing your architecture.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Related model pricing

Claude Opus 4.7 currently costs $5.00 / $25.00 per 1M tokens. These are the models worth pricing against it, taken live from the tracked registry.

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

See every tracked AI pricing change →