GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI 1024000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.060000
Output: $0.060000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 8,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
- Output Cost: $0.060000
- Total Cost: $0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001505
- Tokens per dollar: 664,615 tokens
- Context Window: 1024000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 4 minutes, 49.08 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 374 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 Thinking. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-5.4 Thinking| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-5.4 Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.002650 Best Value | ↓ 98.4% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.008125 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 95% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.011150 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 93.1% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.011150 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 93.1% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.013250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 91.8% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.022875 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 85.9% cheaper |
| #7 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.024375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 85% cheaper |
| #8 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.028500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 82.5% cheaper |
| #9 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.030500 | ↓ 81.2% cheaper |
| #10 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.031350 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 80.7% cheaper |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 80% cheaper |
| #12 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 80% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.045750 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 71.8% cheaper |
| #14 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 70% cheaper |
| #15 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.061000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 62.5% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.063875 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 60.7% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.063875 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 60.7% cheaper |
| #18 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #19 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.091250 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 43.8% cheaper |
| #20 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.091500 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 43.7% cheaper |
| #21 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.098000 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 39.7% cheaper |
| #22 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.098000 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 39.7% cheaper |
| #23 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.130000 | ↓ 20% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 6.2% cheaper |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 6.2% cheaper |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 6.2% cheaper |
| #27 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 6.2% cheaper |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | Same price |
| #29 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | Same price |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | Same price |
| #31 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.285000 (rounded ~ $0.29) | ↑ 75.4% more |
| #32 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.301250 (rounded ~ $0.30) | ↑ 85.4% more |
| #33 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.301250 (rounded ~ $0.30) | ↑ 85.4% more |
| #34 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.305000 (rounded ~ $0.31) | ↑ 87.7% more |
| #35 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.305000 (rounded ~ $0.31) | ↑ 87.7% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↑ 100% more |
| #37 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.570000 | ↑ 250.8% more |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.610000 | ↑ 275.4% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.766500 (rounded ~ $0.77) | ↑ 371.7% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.766500 (rounded ~ $0.77) | ↑ 371.7% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
o4-mini OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Optimizing Creative Scripting with Advanced Reasoning
For financial analysts and producers managing high-volume video content, the shift from basic text generation to structured, long-form scriptwriting requires models that can maintain narrative consistency over thousands of tokens. GPT-5.4 Thinking stands out as a specialized tool for this specific workload. By leveraging its reasoning capabilities, the model can effectively map out complex character arcs, maintain tone, and handle iterative feedback without losing the original narrative thread.
Unlike standard text models that might prioritize speed at the expense of coherence, GPT-5.4 Thinking utilizes its reasoning layer to validate logical consistency throughout the script. This is particularly valuable for long-form video production where plot holes or inconsistent character motivations can necessitate expensive reshoots or heavy editing during post-production. For teams producing multiple scripts per week, this pre-production validation acts as a form of insurance, reducing the need for manual oversight and multi-pass revisions.
Decision-makers should consider this model when the script’s quality hinges on complex structural planning and nuanced dialogue rather than simple, boilerplate content. While the processing time for reasoning might be slightly higher than non-reasoning counterparts, the downstream efficiency gained from fewer required revisions often justifies the investment. It is the ideal fit for creators who need a reliable, high-level writing partner that treats script development as a multi-step design process rather than a single-shot generation task.