What are cached tokens and how do they save money?

Cached tokens are repeated input tokens (like system prompts or conversation history) that providers charge at a discounted rate. Anthropic offers varying discounts for cached tokens (typically 50-80%). Your calculation saves money by applying caching to 20% of input tokens for optimized cost savings.

When should I use Batch API vs real-time API?

Use Batch API for non-realtime processing of large volumes where latency isn't critical (saves up to 40-60%). Use real-time API for interactive applications like chatbots. Batch processing is ideal for data analysis, content generation in bulk, and offline processing.

What should I consider when comparing different AI models?

When comparing AI models, focus on factors such as performance, accuracy, response speed, cost, scalability, and how well the model fits your specific use case. The right choice depends on your workload, budget, and the type of tasks you want the AI to handle. Using an AI cost and time calculator can help you make an informed, data-driven decision.

50K-Token Pull Request Analysis: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (50M Monthly)

Name: DeepSeek V4 Pro
Brand: DeepSeek
Price: 0.03 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5 (89 reviews)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has been replaced by Claude Sonnet 5.5

The pricing shown below is for the older model and is kept for reference. If you are choosing a model today, use the current version — its rate and context window differ.

See current Claude Sonnet 5.5 pricing → · All recent pricing changes

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Complete Comparison: 50,000 input tokens × 1,500 output tokens

⚡ 20% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 20% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 98% savings) 📊 Batch API

Comparison Criteria	Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (20% cached)
Input Tokens	50,000	50,000
Output Tokens	1,500	1,500
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost	$0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)Worst	$0.033000 (rounded ~ $0.03)Best
Output Cost	$0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)Worst	$0.002970Best
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR)	$0.000000	$0.000000
Service Fees	$0.000000	$0.000000
Total Cost	$0.036375 (rounded ~ $0.04) Most Expensive	$0.029502 Best Value
Processing Time	1 minute, 58.06 seconds Fastest	2 minutes, 57.00 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second	450Fastest	300Slowest
Time to First Token	200ms Worst	180ms Best
Cost per 1K tokens	$0.000706Worst	$0.000573Best
Tokens per Dollar	1,415,808Worst Value	1,745,644Best Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base)	$0.750000Worst	$0.660000Best
Output Cost / 1M (Base)	$3.750000Worst	$1.980000Best
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.660000Worst Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$1.875000 (rounded ~ $1.88)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$1.980000Worst Optimizations: No optimizations applied
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support	✓ Supported	✗ Not Supported
Caching Support 20	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Batch API Support	✓ Supported	✗ Not Supported
Tool Usage Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported

Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Provider

Model

Second Model

Provider

Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000

$0.036375 (rounded ~ $0.04)

Total Cost

⚡ 20% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.043125 (rounded ~ $0.04) Input: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Output: $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)

Optimized Cost $0.036375 (rounded ~ $0.04) Input: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Output: $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.006750 (rounded ~ $0.01) 15.7% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 50,000 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Output Cost: $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Total Cost: $0.036375 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000706
Tokens per dollar: 1,415,808 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 200ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 1 minute, 58.06 seconds
Latency: 200 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 437 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for complex architectural reviews; use DeepSeek V4 Pro for high-throughputautomated routine PR checks.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek 1000000

$0.029502

Total Cost

⚡ 20% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✗ Not Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✗ Not Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

98% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.035970 (rounded ~ $0.04) Input: $0.033000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.002970

Optimized Cost $0.029502 Input: $0.033000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.002970
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.006468 (rounded ~ $0.01) 18.0% discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 50,000 input tokens and 1,500 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.033000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output Cost: $0.002970
Total Cost: $0.029502
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000573
Tokens per dollar: 1,745,644 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 300 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 2 minutes, 57.00 seconds
Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 300 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 291 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for complex architectural reviews; use DeepSeek V4 Pro for high-throughputautomated routine PR checks.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for DeepSeek V4 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 4.6

📋 Active Input Parameters

Input Tokens: 50,000

Output Tokens: 1,500

Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)

Cached Tokens: 20%

Tools: Enabled

Rank	AI Model & Provider	Total Cost	vs Claude Sonnet 4.6	vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
🏆	Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic	$0.002425 Best Value	↓ 93.3% cheaper	↓ 91.8% cheaper
🥈	GPT-6 Luna OpenAI	$0.002425	↓ 93.3% cheaper	↓ 91.8% cheaper
🥉	GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI	$0.002500	↓ 93.1% cheaper	↓ 91.5% cheaper
#4	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google	$0.003125	↓ 91.4% cheaper	↓ 89.4% cheaper
#5	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google	$0.004013	↓ 89% cheaper	↓ 86.4% cheaper
#6	Gemini 2.5 Flash Google	$0.004013	↓ 89% cheaper	↓ 86.4% cheaper
#7	Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI	$0.005688 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 84.4% cheaper	↓ 80.7% cheaper
#8	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	$0.009094	↓ 75% cheaper	↓ 69.2% cheaper
#9	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google	$0.009094	↓ 75% cheaper	↓ 69.2% cheaper
#10	GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI	$0.009375	↓ 74.2% cheaper	↓ 68.2% cheaper
#11	Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic	$0.012125 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 66.7% cheaper	↓ 58.9% cheaper
#12	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google	$0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 65.6% cheaper	↓ 57.6% cheaper
#13	Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI	$0.015508 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 57.4% cheaper	↓ 47.4% cheaper
#14	GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI	$0.023188 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 36.3% cheaper	↓ 21.4% cheaper
#15	GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI	$0.023188 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 36.3% cheaper	↓ 21.4% cheaper
#16	Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic	$0.024000 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 34% cheaper	↓ 18.6% cheaper
#17	Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic	$0.024250 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 33.3% cheaper	↓ 17.8% cheaper
#18	Gemini 4 Argon Google	$0.024250 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 33.3% cheaper	↓ 17.8% cheaper
#19	GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI	$0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 31.3% cheaper	↓ 15.3% cheaper
#20	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	$0.033125 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 8.9% cheaper	↑ 12.3% more
#21	Grok 4.3 xAI	$0.044000 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↑ 21% more	↑ 49.1% more
#22	Grok 4.20 Beta xAI	$0.044000 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↑ 21% more	↑ 49.1% more
#23	Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic	$0.048000 (rounded ~ $0.05)	↑ 32% more	↑ 62.7% more
#24	GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI	$0.048500 (rounded ~ $0.05)	↑ 33.3% more	↑ 64.4% more
#25	GPT-6 Sol OpenAI	$0.048500 (rounded ~ $0.05)	↑ 33.3% more	↑ 64.4% more
#26	GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI	$0.048500 (rounded ~ $0.05)	↑ 33.3% more	↑ 64.4% more
#27	Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	$0.050000	↑ 37.5% more	↑ 69.5% more
#28	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic	$0.060625	↑ 66.7% more	↑ 105.5% more
#29	Claude Opus 5 Anthropic	$0.060625	↑ 66.7% more	↑ 105.5% more
#30	Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	$0.060625	↑ 66.7% more	↑ 105.5% more
#31	Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	$0.060625	↑ 66.7% more	↑ 105.5% more
#32	GPT-5.4 OpenAI	$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 71.8% more	↑ 111.9% more
#33	GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI	$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 71.8% more	↑ 111.9% more
#34	GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI	$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 71.8% more	↑ 111.9% more
#35	Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic	$0.119375	↑ 228.2% more	↑ 304.6% more
#36	Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic	$0.119375	↑ 228.2% more	↑ 304.6% more
#37	Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	$0.121250 (rounded ~ $0.12)	↑ 233.3% more	↑ 311% more
#38	Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	$0.121250 (rounded ~ $0.12)	↑ 233.3% more	↑ 311% more
#39	GPT-5.5 OpenAI	$0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)	↑ 243.6% more	↑ 323.7% more
#40	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$0.242500 (rounded ~ $0.24)	↑ 566.7% more	↑ 722% more
#41	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.278250 (rounded ~ $0.28)	↑ 664.9% more	↑ 843.2% more
#42	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.278250 (rounded ~ $0.28)	↑ 664.9% more	↑ 843.2% more

🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

$0.002425

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 93.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 91.8%

🥈

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.002425

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 93.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 91.8%

🥉

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.002500

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 93.1%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 91.5%

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.003125

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 91.4%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 89.4%

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.004013

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 89%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 86.4%

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.004013

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 89%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 86.4%

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.005688 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 84.4%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 80.7%

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.009094

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 75%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 69.2%

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.009094

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 75%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 69.2%

#10

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.009375

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 74.2%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 68.2%

#11

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.012125 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 66.7%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 58.9%

#12

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 65.6%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 57.6%

#13

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

$0.015508 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 57.4%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 47.4%

#14

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.023188 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 36.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 21.4%

#15

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.023188 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 36.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 21.4%

#16

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic

$0.024000 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 34%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 18.6%

#17

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.024250 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 33.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 17.8%

#18

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

$0.024250 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 33.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 17.8%

#19

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 31.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↓ 15.3%

#20

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.033125 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 8.9%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 12.3%

#21

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.044000 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 21%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 49.1%

#22

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.044000 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 21%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 49.1%

#23

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

$0.048000 (rounded ~ $0.05)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 32%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 62.7%

#24

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

$0.048500 (rounded ~ $0.05)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 33.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 64.4%

#25

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.048500 (rounded ~ $0.05)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 33.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 64.4%

#26

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.048500 (rounded ~ $0.05)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 33.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 64.4%

#27

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.050000

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 37.5%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 69.5%

#28

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.060625

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 105.5%

#29

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.060625

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 105.5%

#30

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.060625

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 105.5%

#31

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.060625

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 105.5%

#32

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 71.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 111.9%

#33

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 71.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 111.9%

#34

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 71.8%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 111.9%

#35

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.119375

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 228.2%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 304.6%

#36

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.119375

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 228.2%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 304.6%

#37

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.121250 (rounded ~ $0.12)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 311%

#38

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.121250 (rounded ~ $0.12)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 311%

#39

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 243.6%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 323.7%

#40

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.242500 (rounded ~ $0.24)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 566.7%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 722%

#41

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.278250 (rounded ~ $0.28)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 664.9%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 843.2%

#42

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.278250 (rounded ~ $0.28)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 664.9%

vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: ↑ 843.2%

✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For engineering teams shipping high-velocity features, the choice between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and DeepSeek V4 Pro often comes down to balancing sophisticated reasoning against raw throughput. Claude Sonnet 4.6 excels in multi-step architectural reasoning, making it a natural fit for complex PRs where structural changes need careful vetting. Its instruction-following capabilities help maintain strict adherence to project-specific coding standards, which is vital when scaling to 50M tokens monthly.

DeepSeek V4 Pro, meanwhile, has emerged as a high-efficiency alternative. It is particularly effective for teams that prioritize rapid, agentic coding assistance. Its architecture allows it to handle large diffs with notable speed, which can be an advantage when you need to clear a backlog of routine PRs without bottlenecking development. While Claude provides superior depth in nuanced reasoning—often detecting logic errors that simpler models miss—DeepSeek V4 Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio for teams that have already codified their best practices into test suites and linters. If your priority is deep, architectural code review, Claude remains the gold standard. If your priority is an efficient, automated first-pass reviewer that integrates seamlessly into a high-throughput CI/CD pipeline, DeepSeek V4 Pro is a highly competitive choice that warrants testing in your specific codebase.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?

Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.

How does prompt caching work?

Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.

How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?

Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.

What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?

The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

50K-Token Pull Request Analysis: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (50M Monthly)

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Second Model

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Calculate Token Costs

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

Model Comparison

Model Information

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon Google

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

Grok 4.3 xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta xAI

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Related model pricing

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

Grok 4.3
xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI