Per-Request Catalog Translation: 50K-Token Cost with Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has been replaced by Claude Sonnet 5

The pricing shown below is for the older model and is kept for reference. If you are choosing a model today, use the current version — its rate and context window differ.

See current Claude Sonnet 5 pricing →  ·  All recent pricing changes

Complete Analysis: 100,000 tokens for Claude Sonnet 4.6
⚡ 30% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.6 model with 30% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
$0.214875 (rounded ~ $0.21) Total Cost
100,000 Total Tokens
3 minutes, 46.85 seconds Processing Time
441 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 4.6
AnthropicMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$3 / $15 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
30%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.026250 Input Cost
$0.187500 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
100,000Total Tokens
$0.002149Cost per 1K
465,387Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

3m 46s Processing Time
450 Tokens/Second
200ms Time to First Token
441 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000

$0.214875 (rounded ~ $0.21)
Total Cost
⚡ 30% Cached 📊 Batch API
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.225000 (rounded ~ $0.23) Input: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Output: $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)
Optimized Cost $0.214875 (rounded ~ $0.21) Input: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
Output: $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.010125 4.5% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 50,000 input tokens and 50,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
  • Output Cost: $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)
  • Total Cost: $0.214875 (rounded ~ $0.21)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.002149
  • Tokens per dollar: 465,387 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 200ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 3 minutes, 46.85 seconds
  • Latency: 200 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 441 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

High-fidelitybrand-sensitive translation where idiomatic nuance and long-term context retention are critical.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 4.6
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 50,000
Output Tokens: 50,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 30%
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
$0.004663 Best Value ↓ 97.8% cheaper
🥈 Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
$0.004663 ↓ 97.8% cheaper
🥉 Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
$0.012988 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 94% cheaper
#4 Devstral 2
Mistral AI
$0.014900 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 93.1% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.021031 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 90.2% cheaper
#6 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.023313 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 89.2% cheaper
#7 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.033988 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 84.2% cheaper
#8 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.033988 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 84.2% cheaper
#9 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.053719 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↓ 75% cheaper
#10 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.059125 ↓ 72.5% cheaper
#11 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.063094 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↓ 70.6% cheaper
#12 o4-mini
OpenAI
$0.065038 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↓ 69.7% cheaper
#13 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.071625 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↓ 66.7% cheaper
#14 Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
$0.080750 ↓ 62.4% cheaper
#15 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.084125 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↓ 60.8% cheaper
#16 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.084125 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↓ 60.8% cheaper
#17 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.107438 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↓ 50% cheaper
#18 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.126188 (rounded ~ $0.13) ↓ 41.3% cheaper
#19 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.136500 (rounded ~ $0.14) ↓ 36.5% cheaper
#20 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.136500 (rounded ~ $0.14) ↓ 36.5% cheaper
#21 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.143250 (rounded ~ $0.14) ↓ 33.3% cheaper
#22 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.190969 ↓ 11.1% cheaper
#23 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.190969 ↓ 11.1% cheaper
#24 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.210313 ↓ 2.1% cheaper
#25 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.272813 (rounded ~ $0.27) ↑ 27% more
#26 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.336500 (rounded ~ $0.34) ↑ 56.6% more
#27 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36) ↑ 66.7% more
#28 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36) ↑ 66.7% more
#29 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36) ↑ 66.7% more
#30 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36) ↑ 66.7% more
#31 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.420625 ↑ 95.8% more
#32 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.420625 ↑ 95.8% more
#33 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.420625 ↑ 95.8% more
#34 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.420625 ↑ 95.8% more
#35 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.591250 (rounded ~ $0.59) ↑ 175.2% more
#36 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$0.713438 (rounded ~ $0.71) ↑ 232% more
#37 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$0.713438 (rounded ~ $0.71) ↑ 232% more
#38 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$0.716250 (rounded ~ $0.72) ↑ 233.3% more
#39 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$0.716250 (rounded ~ $0.72) ↑ 233.3% more
#40 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.841250 (rounded ~ $0.84) ↑ 291.5% more
#41 o3 Pro
OpenAI
$1.182500 (rounded ~ $1.18) ↑ 450.3% more
#42 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$1.432500 (rounded ~ $1.43) ↑ 566.7% more
#43 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$2.291625 (rounded ~ $2.29) ↑ 966.5% more
#44 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$2.291625 (rounded ~ $2.29) ↑ 966.5% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.004663
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 97.8%
🥈

Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI

$0.004663
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 97.8%
🥉

Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA

$0.012988 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 94%
#4

Devstral 2
Mistral AI

$0.014900 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 93.1%
#5

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.021031 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 90.2%
#6

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.023313 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 89.2%
#7

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.033988 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 84.2%
#8

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.033988 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 84.2%
#9

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.053719 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 75%
#10

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.059125
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 72.5%
#11

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.063094 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 70.6%
#12

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.065038 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 69.7%
#13

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.071625 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 66.7%
#14

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI

$0.080750
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 62.4%
#15

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.084125 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 60.8%
#16

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.084125 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 60.8%
#17

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.107438 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 50%
#18

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.126188 (rounded ~ $0.13)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 41.3%
#19

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.136500 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 36.5%
#20

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.136500 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 36.5%
#21

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.143250 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 33.3%
#22

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.190969
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 11.1%
#23

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.190969
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 11.1%
#24

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.210313
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 2.1%
#25

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.272813 (rounded ~ $0.27)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 27%
#26

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.336500 (rounded ~ $0.34)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 56.6%
#27

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
#28

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
#29

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
#30

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%
#31

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.420625
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 95.8%
#32

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.420625
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 95.8%
#33

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.420625
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 95.8%
#34

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.420625
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 95.8%
#35

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.591250 (rounded ~ $0.59)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 175.2%
#36

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.713438 (rounded ~ $0.71)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 232%
#37

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.713438 (rounded ~ $0.71)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 232%
#38

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.716250 (rounded ~ $0.72)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%
#39

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.716250 (rounded ~ $0.72)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%
#40

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.841250 (rounded ~ $0.84)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 291.5%
#41

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$1.182500 (rounded ~ $1.18)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 450.3%
#42

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$1.432500 (rounded ~ $1.43)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 566.7%
#43

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$2.291625 (rounded ~ $2.29)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 966.5%
#44

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$2.291625 (rounded ~ $2.29)
vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 966.5%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For product managers and content leads overseeing global e-commerce expansions, maintaining brand integrity across 12+ languages is the primary challenge. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has emerged as a preferred solution for high-fidelity translation pipelines where quality and cultural relevance take precedence over sheer raw speed.

Unlike generic translation engines, Claude Sonnet 4.6 excels at understanding the underlying intent and stylistic nuances of marketing copy. When translating product descriptions, it avoids the common pitfalls of direct, literal translation, instead favoring natural, idiomatic phrasing that resonates with local target audiences. This makes it particularly effective for fashion, luxury, or lifestyle brands where tone-of-voice is part of the product value proposition.

From a pipeline perspective, this model integrates seamlessly into existing workflows that require complex multi-step reasoning—such as extracting key product attributes from raw manufacturer data and then localizing them for specific regions. Its performance on complex, context-heavy tasks ensures that terminology remains consistent, even when dealing with technical documentation or specialized industry jargon. For teams that view localization as a strategic differentiator rather than a commodity, investing in the reasoning capabilities of Sonnet 4.6 can significantly reduce the overhead of human review and re-localization efforts, leading to a more streamlined and accurate global content strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.