Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.100000
Output: $0.100000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 4,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $2.500000
- Output Cost: $0.100000
- Total Cost: $1.475000 (rounded ~ $1.48)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.002927
- Tokens per dollar: 341,695 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 34 minutes, 34.33 seconds
- Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 243 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Opus 4.7| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.074750 (rounded ~ $0.07) Best Value | ↓ 94.9% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.092500 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 93.7% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.092500 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 93.7% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.221250 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↓ 85% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.299000 | ↓ 79.7% cheaper |
| #6 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.299000 | ↓ 79.7% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.442500 (rounded ~ $0.44) | ↓ 70% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.448500 (rounded ~ $0.45) | ↓ 69.6% cheaper |
| #9 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.590000 | ↓ 60% cheaper |
| #10 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.707500 (rounded ~ $0.71) | ↓ 52% cheaper |
| #11 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.707500 (rounded ~ $0.71) | ↓ 52% cheaper |
| #12 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.747500 (rounded ~ $0.75) | ↓ 49.3% cheaper |
| #13 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.747500 (rounded ~ $0.75) | ↓ 49.3% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.885000 (rounded ~ $0.89) | ↓ 40% cheaper |
| #15 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$1.172000 (rounded ~ $1.17) | ↓ 20.5% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$1.465000 (rounded ~ $1.47) | ↓ 0.7% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$1.465000 (rounded ~ $1.47) | ↓ 0.7% cheaper |
| #18 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$1.475000 (rounded ~ $1.48) | Same price |
| #19 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$1.475000 (rounded ~ $1.48) | Same price |
| #20 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$1.475000 (rounded ~ $1.48) | Same price |
| #21 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$1.495000 (rounded ~ $1.50) | ↑ 1.4% more |
| #22 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$2.762500 (rounded ~ $2.76) | ↑ 87.3% more |
| #23 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$2.762500 (rounded ~ $2.76) | ↑ 87.3% more |
| #24 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$2.930000 | ↑ 98.6% more |
| #25 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$2.950000 | ↑ 100% more |
| #26 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$2.950000 | ↑ 100% more |
| #27 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$5.900000 | ↑ 300% more |
| #28 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$5.900000 | ↑ 300% more |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
For creators and UX designers tasked with producing high-quality video content at scale, Claude Opus 4.7 offers a sophisticated balance of narrative nuance and structural consistency. Scriptwriting requires more than just factual accuracy; it demands an understanding of tone, pacing, and the subtle emotional beats that keep a viewer engaged. When processing 500,000 tokens monthly for script drafting, this model excels in maintaining character voice and long-form narrative arcs across multiple segments, ensuring that your content feels cohesive rather than fragmented.
Unlike models optimized purely for rapid information retrieval, Opus 4.7 demonstrates a high capacity for creative reasoning. This is particularly valuable when you are developing complex video scripts that require multiple iterations or cross-referencing against previous project briefs. Designers will appreciate the model’s ability to handle intricate, multi-step instructions without losing the creative thread. While some models may prioritize speed over depth, the extra effort invested by Opus 4.7 in ‘thinking’ through the script structure typically results in fewer revisions and a more polished final output.
From a workflow perspective, this model is an excellent choice for teams that prioritize the ‘human touch’ in AI-generated assets. It handles complex, stylistic requirements with precision, making it a reliable partner for scripts that need to feel authentic and well-structured. For designers moving between various video projects, the reliability of Opus 4.7 as a consistent, high-intelligence partner is its greatest advantage in a professional production environment.