What are cached tokens and how do they save money?

Cached tokens are repeated input tokens (like system prompts or conversation history) that providers charge at a discounted rate. Anthropic offers varying discounts for cached tokens (typically 50-80%). Your calculation saves money by applying caching to 50% of input tokens for optimized cost savings.

When should I use Batch API vs real-time API?

Use Batch API for non-realtime processing of large volumes where latency isn't critical (saves up to 40-60%). Use real-time API for interactive applications like chatbots. Batch processing is ideal for data analysis, content generation in bulk, and offline processing.

What should I consider when comparing different AI models?

When comparing AI models, focus on factors such as performance, accuracy, response speed, cost, scalability, and how well the model fits your specific use case. The right choice depends on your workload, budget, and the type of tasks you want the AI to handle. Using an AI cost and time calculator can help you make an informed, data-driven decision.

Cost Optimization: Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash for 100K Multi-Turn Support Conversations

Name: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Brand: Google
Price: 0.01 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5 (89 reviews)

Claude Haiku 4.6 is no longer available

This model has been withdrawn by its provider and can no longer be called. The figures below are kept as a historical record and do not reflect a currently purchasable rate.

See current Claude Haiku 5.5 pricing → · All recent pricing changes

Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Complete Comparison: 8,000 input tokens × 2,000 output tokens

⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API

Comparison Criteria	Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic	Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens	8,000	8,000
Output Tokens	2,000	2,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost	$0.000500Best	$0.003000Worst
Output Cost	$0.000625Best	$0.004500Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR)	$0.000000	$0.000000
Service Fees	$0.000000	$0.000000
Total Cost	$0.000900 Best Value	$0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01) Most Expensive
Processing Time	12.77 seconds	12.77 seconds
Tokens per Second	850	850
Time to First Token	75ms Best	90ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens	$0.000090Best	$0.000615Worst
Tokens per Dollar	11,111,111Best Value	1,626,016Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base)	$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)Best	$0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base)	$0.312500 (rounded ~ $0.31)Best	$2.250000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.156250 (rounded ~ $0.16)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$1.125000 (rounded ~ $1.13)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Video Support	✗ Not Supported	✓ Supported
Audio Support	✗ Not Supported	✓ Supported
Caching Support 50	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Batch API Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported

Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Provider

Model

Second Model

Provider

Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic

$0.000900

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.001125 Input: $0.000500
Output: $0.000625

Optimized Cost $0.000900 Input: $0.000500
Output: $0.000625
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.000225 20.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 8,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.000500
Output Cost: $0.000625
Total Cost: $0.000900
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000090
Tokens per dollar: 11,111,111 tokens
Context Window: 200000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 75ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 12.77 seconds
Latency: 75 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 794 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for indie game developers needing consistentlow-latency NPC dialogue and cost-effectivehigh-volume customer support automation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Haiku 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google 1000000

$0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01)

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✓ Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✓ Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.003000
Output: $0.004500

Optimized Cost $0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.003000
Output: $0.004500
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.001350 18.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 8,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.003000
Output Cost: $0.004500
Total Cost: $0.006150 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000615
Tokens per dollar: 1,626,016 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 90ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 12.77 seconds
Latency: 90 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 794 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for indie game developers needing consistentlow-latency NPC dialogue and cost-effectivehigh-volume customer support automation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Haiku 4.6

📋 Active Input Parameters

Input Tokens: 8,000

Output Tokens: 2,000

Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)

Cached Tokens: 50%

Tools: Enabled

Rank	AI Model & Provider	Total Cost	vs Claude Haiku 4.6	vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
🏆	Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic	$0.000720 Best Value	↓ 20% cheaper	↓ 88.3% cheaper
🥈	GPT-6 Luna OpenAI	$0.000720	↓ 20% cheaper	↓ 88.3% cheaper
🥉	GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI	$0.000820	↓ 8.9% cheaper	↓ 86.7% cheaper
#4	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google	$0.001025	↑ 13.9% more	↓ 83.3% cheaper
#5	Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI	$0.001300	↑ 44.4% more	↓ 78.9% cheaper
#6	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google	$0.001580	↑ 75.6% more	↓ 74.3% cheaper
#7	Gemini 2.5 Flash Google	$0.001580	↑ 75.6% more	↓ 74.3% cheaper
#8	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	$0.002700	↑ 200% more	↓ 56.1% cheaper
#9	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google	$0.002700	↑ 200% more	↓ 56.1% cheaper
#10	GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI	$0.003075	↑ 241.7% more	↓ 50% cheaper
#11	Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI	$0.003586	↑ 298.4% more	↓ 41.7% cheaper
#12	Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic	$0.003600	↑ 300% more	↓ 41.5% cheaper
#13	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google	$0.004100	↑ 355.6% more	↓ 33.3% cheaper
#14	Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic	$0.007100 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 688.9% more	↑ 15.4% more
#15	Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic	$0.007200 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 700% more	↑ 17.1% more
#16	Gemini 4 Argon Google	$0.007200 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 700% more	↑ 17.1% more
#17	GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI	$0.008200 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 811.1% more	↑ 33.3% more
#18	Grok 4.3 xAI	$0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 833.3% more	↑ 36.6% more
#19	Grok 4.20 Beta xAI	$0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 833.3% more	↑ 36.6% more
#20	GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI	$0.008925 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 891.7% more	↑ 45.1% more
#21	GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI	$0.008925 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 891.7% more	↑ 45.1% more
#22	Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	$0.010800	↑ 1100% more	↑ 75.6% more
#23	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	$0.012750 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 1316.7% more	↑ 107.3% more
#24	Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic	$0.014200 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 1477.8% more	↑ 130.9% more
#25	GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI	$0.014400 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 1500% more	↑ 134.1% more
#26	GPT-6 Sol OpenAI	$0.014400 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 1500% more	↑ 134.1% more
#27	GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI	$0.014400 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 1500% more	↑ 134.1% more
#28	Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	$0.016400 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 1722.2% more	↑ 166.7% more
#29	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic	$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 1900% more	↑ 192.7% more
#30	Claude Opus 5 Anthropic	$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 1900% more	↑ 192.7% more
#31	Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 1900% more	↑ 192.7% more
#32	Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 1900% more	↑ 192.7% more
#33	GPT-5.4 OpenAI	$0.020500	↑ 2177.8% more	↑ 233.3% more
#34	GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI	$0.020500	↑ 2177.8% more	↑ 233.3% more
#35	GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI	$0.020500	↑ 2177.8% more	↑ 233.3% more
#36	Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic	$0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↑ 3816.7% more	↑ 473.2% more
#37	Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic	$0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↑ 3816.7% more	↑ 473.2% more
#38	Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	$0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↑ 3900% more	↑ 485.4% more
#39	Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	$0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↑ 3900% more	↑ 485.4% more
#40	GPT-5.5 OpenAI	$0.041000	↑ 4455.6% more	↑ 566.7% more
#41	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$0.072000 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↑ 7900% more	↑ 1070.7% more
#42	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.107100 (rounded ~ $0.11)	↑ 11800% more	↑ 1641.5% more
#43	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.107100 (rounded ~ $0.11)	↑ 11800% more	↑ 1641.5% more

🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

$0.000720

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↓ 20%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 88.3%

🥈

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.000720

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↓ 20%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 88.3%

🥉

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.000820

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↓ 8.9%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 86.7%

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.001025

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 13.9%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 83.3%

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.001300

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 44.4%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 78.9%

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.001580

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 75.6%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 74.3%

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.001580

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 75.6%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 74.3%

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.002700

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 200%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 56.1%

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.002700

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 200%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 56.1%

#10

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.003075

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 241.7%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 50%

#11

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

$0.003586

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 298.4%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 41.7%

#12

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.003600

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 300%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 41.5%

#13

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.004100

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 355.6%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↓ 33.3%

#14

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic

$0.007100 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 688.9%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 15.4%

#15

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.007200 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 700%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 17.1%

#16

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

$0.007200 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 700%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 17.1%

#17

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.008200 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 811.1%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 33.3%

#18

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 833.3%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 36.6%

#19

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.008400 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 833.3%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 36.6%

#20

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.008925 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 891.7%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 45.1%

#21

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.008925 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 891.7%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 45.1%

#22

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.010800

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1100%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 75.6%

#23

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.012750 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1316.7%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 107.3%

#24

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

$0.014200 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1477.8%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 130.9%

#25

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

$0.014400 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1500%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 134.1%

#26

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.014400 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1500%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 134.1%

#27

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.014400 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1500%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 134.1%

#28

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.016400 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1722.2%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 166.7%

#29

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 192.7%

#30

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 192.7%

#31

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 192.7%

#32

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 192.7%

#33

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.020500

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2177.8%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 233.3%

#34

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.020500

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2177.8%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 233.3%

#35

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.020500

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2177.8%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 233.3%

#36

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3816.7%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 473.2%

#37

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.035250 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3816.7%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 473.2%

#38

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 485.4%

#39

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.036000 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 485.4%

#40

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.041000

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 4455.6%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#41

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.072000 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 7900%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 1070.7%

#42

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.107100 (rounded ~ $0.11)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 11800%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 1641.5%

#43

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.107100 (rounded ~ $0.11)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 11800%

vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: ↑ 1641.5%

✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For indie developers building in-game customer support or AI-driven NPC dialogue, the primary challenge is balancing character consistency with low-latency responsiveness. When scaling to 100,000 multi-turn conversations, the choice between Claude Haiku 4.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash often comes down to your specific technical architecture and the nature of your interaction loops.

Claude Haiku 4.6 is frequently favored for its reliability in following complex instructions and maintaining persona consistency. In multi-turn scenarios, it excels at adhering to strict system prompts without drifting, which is critical for maintaining an immersive in-game experience. If your support NPCs require high-fidelity adherence to a specific tone or a rigid lore-based rulebook, Haiku’s focused instruction-following capabilities provide a stable foundation.

On the other hand, Gemini 3.5 Flash is engineered for high-throughput, agentic workflows. Its speed and multimodal-native architecture make it a powerhouse if your support pipeline involves more than just text—such as processing user-submitted screenshots of bug reports or integrating real-time game state data. Gemini 3.5 Flash is particularly adept at handling iterative, multi-step tasks efficiently, often reducing the overhead in complex agentic chains.

Ultimately, the decision rests on your project’s primary friction point. If your priority is absolute adherence to persona and instruction-following, Claude Haiku 4.6 is often the preferred choice for consistent dialogue. If you require a fast, multimodal-ready engine that can handle rapid-fire reasoning across diverse inputs, Gemini 3.5 Flash delivers exceptional ROI.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?

Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.

How does prompt caching work?

Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.

How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?

Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.

What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?

The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Cost Optimization: Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash for 100K Multi-Turn Support Conversations

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Second Model

Select AI Model

Claude Haiku 4.6

Calculate Token Costs

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

Model Comparison

Model Information

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon Google

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

Grok 4.3 xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta xAI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Related model pricing

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

Grok 4.3
xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI