Gemini 3.5 Flash Google 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.001125
Output: $0.001125
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
- Output Cost: $0.001125
- Total Cost: $0.031875 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000317
- Tokens per dollar: 3,152,941 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 90ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 2 minutes, 4.33 seconds
- Latency: 90 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 810 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.5 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.5 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.002088 Best Value | ↓ 93.5% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.005313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 83.3% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.006463 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 79.7% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.006463 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 79.7% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.010438 | ↓ 67.3% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.015844 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 50.3% cheaper |
| #7 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.015938 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #8 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.021000 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 34.1% cheaper |
| #9 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.021125 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 33.7% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 33.3% cheaper |
| #11 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 33.3% cheaper |
| #12 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.023100 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 27.5% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.031688 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 0.6% cheaper |
| #14 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.037625 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 18% more |
| #15 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.037625 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 18% more |
| #16 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.042250 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 32.5% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 66.7% more |
| #18 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.053750 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 68.6% more |
| #19 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.063375 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 98.8% more |
| #20 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.083000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 160.4% more |
| #21 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.083000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 160.4% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.085000 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.105625 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 231.4% more |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.105625 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 231.4% more |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.105625 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 231.4% more |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.105625 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 231.4% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #31 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.207500 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 551% more |
| #32 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.207500 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 551% more |
| #33 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.210000 | ↑ 558.8% more |
| #34 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.211250 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 562.7% more |
| #35 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.211250 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 562.7% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.212500 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #37 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.420000 | ↑ 1217.6% more |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.422500 (rounded ~ $0.42) | ↑ 1225.5% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.451500 (rounded ~ $0.45) | ↑ 1316.5% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.451500 (rounded ~ $0.45) | ↑ 1316.5% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Scaling Email Personalization with High-Throughput Infrastructure
For game studios managing large-scale player communication, email drafting is less about creative writing and more about high-volume, reliable execution. Gemini 3.5 Flash is architected specifically for these high-throughput requirements, excelling in pipelines where consistent latency and cost-efficiency define success. Unlike frontier models optimized for complex reasoning, this model prioritizes speed and structural consistency, making it the ideal choice for generating personalized updates, patch notes, or support responses at scale.
When you are processing 100,000+ emails per day, the primary bottleneck is often the overhead of model invocation. Gemini 3.5 Flash minimizes this friction by offering optimized performance for structured extraction and text generation, ensuring your system remains responsive even during peak player activity or major marketing pushes. The model handles large context windows gracefully, allowing you to inject substantial player history or game-state data into each prompt to ensure the output remains relevant without sacrificing speed.
Decision factors beyond raw capability include the model’s ability to integrate into existing CI/CD pipelines and its native support for function calling, which simplifies the process of linking your email generation to CRM and database triggers. For studio AI leads, this means less time spent managing API latency and more time focusing on optimizing the data inputs that drive personalization. By choosing this path, you trade the marginal reasoning gains of larger, more expensive models for the operational reliability required for true enterprise-scale production.