GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 5,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.008750 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Output Cost: $0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.011813 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.002148
- Tokens per dollar: 465,608 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 1,000 tokens per second and 100ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 5.79 seconds
- Latency: 100 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 1,000 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 980 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.3 Codex Spark. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-5.3 Codex Spark| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-5.3 Codex Spark |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.000525 Best Value | ↓ 95.6% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.000525 | ↓ 95.6% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.001150 | ↓ 90.3% cheaper |
| #4 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.001300 | ↓ 89% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.001438 | ↓ 87.8% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.002075 | ↓ 82.4% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.002075 | ↓ 82.4% cheaper |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.002125 | ↓ 82% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.002875 | ↓ 75.7% cheaper |
| #10 |
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
|
$0.003750 | ↓ 68.3% cheaper |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.003938 | ↓ 66.7% cheaper |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.003938 | ↓ 66.7% cheaper |
| #13 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.004313 | ↓ 63.5% cheaper |
| #14 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.004688 | ↓ 60.3% cheaper |
| #15 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.004688 | ↓ 60.3% cheaper |
| #16 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.005250 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 55.6% cheaper |
| #17 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.005830 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 50.6% cheaper |
| #18 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.008438 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 28.6% cheaper |
| #19 |
Grok 4.7
xAI
|
$0.008500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 28% cheaper |
| #20 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$0.008500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 28% cheaper |
| #21 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$0.008500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 28% cheaper |
| #22 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.010250 | ↓ 13.2% cheaper |
| #23 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.010500 | ↓ 11.1% cheaper |
| #24 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.010500 | ↓ 11.1% cheaper |
| #25 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.010500 | ↓ 11.1% cheaper |
| #26 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.010500 | ↓ 11.1% cheaper |
| #27 |
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
|
$0.010850 | ↓ 8.1% cheaper |
| #28 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.011500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 2.6% cheaper |
| #29 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.011500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 2.6% cheaper |
| #30 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.011813 (rounded ~ $0.01) | Same price |
| #31 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.014375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 21.7% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.014375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 21.7% more |
| #33 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.015750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #34 |
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
|
$0.016275 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 37.8% more |
| #35 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.020500 | ↑ 73.5% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.021000 | ↑ 77.8% more |
| #37 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 122.2% more |
| #38 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 122.2% more |
| #39 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 122.2% more |
| #40 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 122.2% more |
| #41 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 143.4% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 143.4% more |
| #43 |
Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta AI
|
$0.030000 | ↑ 154% more |
| #44 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.050625 | ↑ 328.6% more |
| #45 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.050625 | ↑ 328.6% more |
| #46 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 344.4% more |
| #47 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 344.4% more |
| #48 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 344.4% more |
| #49 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.141750 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↑ 1100% more |
| #50 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.141750 (rounded ~ $0.14) | ↑ 1100% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Grok Build 0.1 xAI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Grok 4.7 xAI
Grok 4.6 xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
Kimi K3.1 Pro Moonshot AI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Kimi K3 Moonshot AI
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Muse Wonder 1.0 Meta AI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
As enterprise development teams transition from simple autocomplete tools to proactive coding agents, the efficiency of the underlying model for inline suggestions has become the primary driver of developer velocity. In 2026, the shift toward agentic IDE workflows means your model needs to do more than just complete a line; it needs to synthesize multi-file context, understand architectural dependencies, and refactor code without introducing regressions. GPT-5.3 Codex Spark is specifically tuned for these high-frequency, latency-critical IDE interactions. Unlike general-purpose models that may struggle with the rapid, repetitive nature of inline suggestions, this model is engineered to minimize time-to-first-token while maintaining the semantic depth required for 5K-token context windows. For teams managing 100M-token monthly volumes, the challenge is balancing model intelligence with the speed required to keep the developer in a flow state. GPT-5.3 Codex Spark excels in this role by providing a streamlined reasoning path that reduces the overhead often seen in larger, more complex frontier models. Its optimized architecture is particularly well-suited for organizations that need to balance the cost of high-volume inference with the necessity of maintaining elite-tier coding performance. When deploying at this scale, consider the model’s ability to handle function calling, which is increasingly essential for agentic tasks beyond mere text generation, such as updating documentation or triggering CI/CD pipelines directly from the editor. This balance of speed, capability, and enterprise-grade reliability makes it a top choice for teams standardizing their AI-assisted development infrastructure this year.