What are cached tokens and how do they save money?

Cached tokens are repeated input tokens (like system prompts or conversation history) that providers charge at a discounted rate. Anthropic offers varying discounts for cached tokens (typically 50-80%). Your calculation saves money by applying caching to 50% of input tokens for optimized cost savings.

When should I use Batch API vs real-time API?

Use Batch API for non-realtime processing of large volumes where latency isn't critical (saves up to 40-60%). Use real-time API for interactive applications like chatbots. Batch processing is ideal for data analysis, content generation in bulk, and offline processing.

What should I consider when comparing different AI models?

When comparing AI models, focus on factors such as performance, accuracy, response speed, cost, scalability, and how well the model fits your specific use case. The right choice depends on your workload, budget, and the type of tasks you want the AI to handle. Using an AI cost and time calculator can help you make an informed, data-driven decision.

Clinical Note Generation: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o4-mini for 100K-Token Medical Workflows

Name: o4-mini
Brand: OpenAI
Price: 0.02 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5 (89 reviews)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has been replaced by Claude Sonnet 5

The pricing shown below is for the older model and is kept for reference. If you are choosing a model today, use the current version — its rate and context window differ.

See current Claude Sonnet 5 pricing → · All recent pricing changes

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o4-mini

Complete Comparison: 100,000 input tokens × 1,000 output tokens

⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API

Comparison Criteria	Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	o4-mini OpenAI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens	100,000	100,000
Output Tokens	1,000	1,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost	$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)Worst	$0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03)Best
Output Cost	$0.003750Worst	$0.001100Best
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR)	$0.000000	$0.000000
Service Fees	$0.000000	$0.000000
Total Cost	$0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05) Most Expensive	$0.016225 (rounded ~ $0.02) Best Value
Processing Time	3 minutes, 49.11 seconds Fastest	9 minutes, 32.51 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second	450Fastest	180Slowest
Time to First Token	200ms Best	280ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens	$0.000446Worst	$0.000161Best
Tokens per Dollar	2,244,444Worst Value	6,224,961Best Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base)	$0.750000Worst	$0.275000 (rounded ~ $0.28)Best
Output Cost / 1M (Base)	$3.750000Worst	$1.100000Best
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.137500 (rounded ~ $0.14)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$1.875000 (rounded ~ $1.88)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.550000Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Caching Support 50	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Batch API Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported

Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Provider

Model

Second Model

Provider

Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000

$0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.078750 (rounded ~ $0.08) Input: $0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)
Output: $0.003750

Optimized Cost $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05) Input: $0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)
Output: $0.003750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03) 42.9% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)
Output Cost: $0.003750
Total Cost: $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000446
Tokens per dollar: 2,244,444 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 450 tokens per second and 200ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 3 minutes, 49.11 seconds
Latency: 200 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 450 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 441 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Sonnet 4.6 for complex clinical reasoning and long-context synthesis. Use o4-mini for high-volumestructured extraction and routine documentation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

o4-mini OpenAI

$0.016225 (rounded ~ $0.02)

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.028600 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.001100

Optimized Cost $0.016225 (rounded ~ $0.02) Input: $0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.001100
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.012375 (rounded ~ $0.01) 43.3% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.027500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output Cost: $0.001100
Total Cost: $0.016225 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000161
Tokens per dollar: 6,224,961 tokens
Context Window: 200000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 180 tokens per second and 280ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 9 minutes, 32.51 seconds
Latency: 280 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 180 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 176 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Sonnet 4.6 for complex clinical reasoning and long-context synthesis. Use o4-mini for high-volumestructured extraction and routine documentation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for o4-mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 4.6

📋 Active Input Parameters

Input Tokens: 100,000

Output Tokens: 1,000

Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)

Cached Tokens: 50%

Tools: Enabled

Rank	AI Model & Provider	Total Cost	vs Claude Sonnet 4.6	vs o4-mini
🏆	Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI	$0.001450 Best Value	↓ 96.8% cheaper	↓ 91.1% cheaper
🥈	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google	$0.003813	↓ 91.5% cheaper	↓ 76.5% cheaper
🥉	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google	$0.004750	↓ 89.4% cheaper	↓ 70.7% cheaper
#4	Gemini 2.5 Flash Google	$0.004750	↓ 89.4% cheaper	↓ 70.7% cheaper
#5	Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI	$0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 83.9% cheaper	↓ 55.3% cheaper
#6	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	$0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 75% cheaper	↓ 30.7% cheaper
#7	GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI	$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 74.6% cheaper	↓ 29.5% cheaper
#8	o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI	$0.014750 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 67.2% cheaper	↓ 9.1% cheaper
#9	Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic	$0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 66.7% cheaper	↓ 7.6% cheaper
#10	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google	$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 66.1% cheaper	↓ 6% cheaper
#11	GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI	$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 66.1% cheaper	↓ 6% cheaper
#12	o4-mini OpenAI	$0.016225 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 63.9% cheaper	Same price
#13	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google	$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 50% cheaper	↑ 38.7% more
#14	Gemini 3.5 Flash Google	$0.022875 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 49.2% cheaper	↑ 41% more
#15	GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI	$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 38.8% cheaper	↑ 69.9% more
#16	GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI	$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 38.8% cheaper	↑ 69.9% more
#17	Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic	$0.030000	↓ 33.3% cheaper	↑ 84.9% more
#18	GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI	$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↓ 15.3% cheaper	↑ 135% more
#19	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	$0.039375	↓ 12.5% cheaper	↑ 142.7% more
#20	Grok 4.3 xAI	$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 26.7% more	↑ 251.3% more
#21	Grok 4.20 Beta xAI	$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 26.7% more	↑ 251.3% more
#22	Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	$0.061000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 35.6% more	↑ 276% more
#23	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic	$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 66.7% more	↑ 362.2% more
#24	Claude Opus 5 Anthropic	$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 66.7% more	↑ 362.2% more
#25	Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 66.7% more	↑ 362.2% more
#26	Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 66.7% more	↑ 362.2% more
#27	GPT-5.4 OpenAI	$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 69.4% more	↑ 370% more
#28	GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI	$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 69.4% more	↑ 370% more
#29	GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI	$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 69.4% more	↑ 370% more
#30	GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI	$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 69.4% more	↑ 370% more
#31	Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic	$0.140625	↑ 212.5% more	↑ 766.7% more
#32	Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic	$0.140625	↑ 212.5% more	↑ 766.7% more
#33	o3 Deep Research OpenAI	$0.147500 (rounded ~ $0.15)	↑ 227.8% more	↑ 809.1% more
#34	Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	$0.150000	↑ 233.3% more	↑ 824.5% more
#35	Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	$0.150000	↑ 233.3% more	↑ 824.5% more
#36	GPT-5.5 OpenAI	$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15)	↑ 238.9% more	↑ 839.9% more
#37	o3 Pro OpenAI	$0.295000 (rounded ~ $0.30)	↑ 555.6% more	↑ 1718.2% more
#38	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$0.300000	↑ 566.7% more	↑ 1749% more
#39	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.330750	↑ 635% more	↑ 1938.5% more
#40	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.330750	↑ 635% more	↑ 1938.5% more

🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.001450

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 96.8%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 91.1%

🥈

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.003813

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 91.5%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 76.5%

🥉

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.004750

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 89.4%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 70.7%

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.004750

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 89.4%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 70.7%

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 83.9%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 55.3%

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 75%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 30.7%

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 74.6%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 29.5%

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.014750 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 67.2%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 9.1%

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 66.7%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 7.6%

#10

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 66.1%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 6%

#11

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 66.1%

vs o4-mini: ↓ 6%

#12

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.016225 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 63.9%

vs o4-mini: Same

#13

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 50%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 38.7%

#14

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.022875 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 49.2%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 41%

#15

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 38.8%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 69.9%

#16

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 38.8%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 69.9%

#17

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.030000

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 33.3%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 84.9%

#18

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 15.3%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 135%

#19

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.039375

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↓ 12.5%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 142.7%

#20

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 26.7%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 251.3%

#21

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 26.7%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 251.3%

#22

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.061000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 35.6%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 276%

#23

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 362.2%

#24

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 362.2%

#25

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 362.2%

#26

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 66.7%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 362.2%

#27

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 69.4%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 370%

#28

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 69.4%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 370%

#29

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 69.4%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 370%

#30

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 69.4%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 370%

#31

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.140625

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 212.5%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 766.7%

#32

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.140625

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 212.5%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 766.7%

#33

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.147500 (rounded ~ $0.15)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 227.8%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 809.1%

#34

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.150000

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 824.5%

#35

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.150000

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 233.3%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 824.5%

#36

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 238.9%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 839.9%

#37

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.295000 (rounded ~ $0.30)

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 555.6%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 1718.2%

#38

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.300000

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 566.7%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 1749%

#39

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.330750

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 635%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 1938.5%

#40

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.330750

vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: ↑ 635%

vs o4-mini: ↑ 1938.5%

✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Clinical note generation requires balancing deep medical reasoning with operational efficiency. For engineering teams, the choice between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o4-mini often comes down to the specific nature of your clinical pipeline—whether you prioritize complex multi-step synthesis or rapid, high-volume extraction. Claude Sonnet 4.6 excels when the workload involves nuanced clinical reasoning, such as synthesizing patient history across scattered records or drafting nuanced encounter summaries. Its adaptive thinking engine allows the model to scale its reasoning depth, which is particularly valuable when processing messy, unstructured medical logs where accuracy is paramount to clinician trust. The model’s large context window enables it to hold long-term patient records in memory, facilitating consistent documentation over time.

Conversely, o4-mini is optimized for high-speed, cost-efficient reasoning. It shines in pipelines where the structure of the clinical note is relatively consistent, such as standard progress notes or routine procedure documentation. Its ability to perform structured output generation makes it a strong candidate for backend automation where you need to parse large volumes of data into specific EHR fields. While it may lack the depth of Sonnet for highly complex, multi-modal clinical diagnostic reasoning, it significantly reduces latency in high-throughput environments. For teams scaling their medical documentation tools, we often recommend starting with o4-mini for routine templated tasks and reserving Claude Sonnet 4.6 for specialized encounters that demand sophisticated analytical depth and clinical precision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?

Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.

How does prompt caching work?

Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.

How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?

Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.

What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?

The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Clinical Note Generation: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o4-mini for 100K-Token Medical Workflows

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Second Model

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Calculate Token Costs

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

Model Comparison

Model Information

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

o4-mini OpenAI

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

o4-mini OpenAI

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

Grok 4.3 xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta xAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic

o3 Deep Research OpenAI

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

o3 Pro OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Related model pricing

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

o4-mini
OpenAI

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

Grok 4.3
xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

o3 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI