o3 Deep Research OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.050000
Output: $0.050000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 200,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.500000
- Output Cost: $0.050000
- Total Cost: $0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001585
- Tokens per dollar: 630,769 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 80 tokens per second and 450ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 43 minutes, 59.55 seconds
- Latency: 450 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 80 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 78 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for o3 Deep Research. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 200,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.250000
- Output Cost: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
- Total Cost: $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000823
- Tokens per dollar: 1,214,815 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 13 minutes, 32.30 seconds
- Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 252 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to o3 Deep Research| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs o3 Deep Research | vs Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.008750 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 97.3% cheaper | ↓ 94.8% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 96.5% cheaper | ↓ 93.3% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 96.5% cheaper | ↓ 93.3% cheaper |
| #4 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.015625 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 95.2% cheaper | ↓ 90.7% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.025313 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 92.2% cheaper | ↓ 85% cheaper |
| #6 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 91.9% cheaper | ↓ 84.4% cheaper |
| #7 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 89.6% cheaper | ↓ 80% cheaper |
| #8 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.035000 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 89.2% cheaper | ↓ 79.3% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.050625 | ↓ 84.4% cheaper | ↓ 70% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 83.8% cheaper | ↓ 68.9% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 79.2% cheaper | ↓ 60% cheaper |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.070000 | ↓ 78.5% cheaper | ↓ 58.5% cheaper |
| #13 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 73.1% cheaper | ↓ 48.1% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 68.8% cheaper | ↓ 40% cheaper |
| #15 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↓ 48.1% cheaper | Same price |
| #16 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↓ 48.1% cheaper | Same price |
| #17 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↓ 48.1% cheaper | Same price |
| #18 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↓ 48.1% cheaper | Same price |
| #19 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↓ 46.2% cheaper | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #20 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↓ 46.2% cheaper | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #21 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↓ 46.2% cheaper | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #22 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↓ 46.2% cheaper | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #23 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) | ↓ 46.2% cheaper | ↑ 3.7% more |
| #24 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.240000 | ↓ 26.2% cheaper | ↑ 42.2% more |
| #25 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.240000 | ↓ 26.2% cheaper | ↑ 42.2% more |
| #26 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.265000 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↓ 18.5% cheaper | ↑ 57% more |
| #27 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32) | ↓ 1.9% cheaper | ↑ 88.9% more |
| #28 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32) | ↓ 1.9% cheaper | ↑ 88.9% more |
| #29 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34) | ↑ 3.8% more | ↑ 100% more |
| #30 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34) | ↑ 3.8% more | ↑ 100% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.662500 (rounded ~ $0.66) | ↑ 103.8% more | ↑ 292.6% more |
| #32 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$1.350000 | ↑ 315.4% more | ↑ 700% more |
| #33 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$1.350000 | ↑ 315.4% more | ↑ 700% more |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
For research-heavy workflows, the choice between o3 Deep Research and Claude Opus 4.7 often comes down to the specific nature of your investigation. Both models excel at processing large context windows, but their underlying architectures serve different research archetypes. o3 Deep Research is explicitly tuned for multi-step, agentic investigation. It is designed to navigate complex queries, synthesize disparate sources, and perform deep reasoning across technical documentation, making it a formidable choice for literature reviews that require connecting abstract concepts across hundreds of pages. It behaves like a research assistant that doesn’t just read, but actively plans its retrieval strategy.
Claude Opus 4.7, by contrast, acts more as a high-fidelity creative and analytical engine. While it handles large-scale document analysis with ease, its strengths lie in nuance, tone consistency, and the ability to synthesize findings into highly readable, publication-ready drafts. If your research workflow involves high-volume data ingestion followed by the need for polished, expert-level prose, Claude often provides a smoother transition from raw analysis to final output. It is less about the discovery process and more about the precision of the synthesis. For publishing teams, the decision often balances the need for o3’s aggressive source-hunting against Claude’s editorial sophistication. Teams that prioritize deep data discovery should lean toward o3, while those focusing on the final drafting and narrative structure will find Claude’s performance difficult to surpass.