o4-mini OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000550
Output: $0.000550
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 10,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.002750
- Output Cost: $0.000550
- Total Cost: $0.002805
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000267
- Tokens per dollar: 3,743,316 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 180 tokens per second and 280ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 1 minute, 2.60 seconds
- Latency: 280 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 180 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 168 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for o4-mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.001095
Output: $0.001095
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 10,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.005500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Output Cost: $0.001095
- Total Cost: $0.005517 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000525
- Tokens per dollar: 1,903,208 tokens
- Context Window: 163840 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 120 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 1 minute, 33.81 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 120 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 112 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for DeepSeek R1. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to o4-mini| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs o4-mini | vs DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.000243 Best Value | ↓ 91.4% cheaper | ↓ 95.6% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.000700 | ↓ 75% cheaper | ↓ 87.3% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.000928 | ↓ 66.9% cheaper | ↓ 83.2% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.000928 | ↓ 66.9% cheaper | ↓ 83.2% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.001213 | ↓ 56.8% cheaper | ↓ 78% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.002006 | ↓ 28.5% cheaper | ↓ 63.6% cheaper |
| #7 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.002100 | ↓ 25.1% cheaper | ↓ 61.9% cheaper |
| #8 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.002550 | ↓ 9.1% cheaper | ↓ 53.8% cheaper |
| #9 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.002675 | ↓ 4.6% cheaper | ↓ 51.5% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.002800 | ↓ 0.2% cheaper | ↓ 49.2% cheaper |
| #11 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.002800 | ↓ 0.2% cheaper | ↓ 49.2% cheaper |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.004013 | ↑ 43% more | ↓ 27.3% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.004200 | ↑ 49.7% more | ↓ 23.9% cheaper |
| #14 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.005338 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 90.3% more | ↓ 3.3% cheaper |
| #15 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.005338 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 90.3% more | ↓ 3.3% cheaper |
| #16 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.005350 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 90.7% more | ↓ 3% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.007000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 149.6% more | ↑ 26.9% more |
| #18 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 171.8% more | ↑ 38.2% more |
| #19 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.008025 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 186.1% more | ↑ 45.5% more |
| #20 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.009200 | ↑ 228% more | ↑ 66.8% more |
| #21 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.009200 | ↑ 228% more | ↑ 66.8% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.011200 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 299.3% more | ↑ 103% more |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.013375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 376.8% more | ↑ 142.4% more |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.013375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 376.8% more | ↑ 142.4% more |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.013375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 376.8% more | ↑ 142.4% more |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.013375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 376.8% more | ↑ 142.4% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 399.1% more | ↑ 153.8% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 399.1% more | ↑ 153.8% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 399.1% more | ↑ 153.8% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 399.1% more | ↑ 153.8% more |
| #31 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.025500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 809.1% more | ↑ 362.2% more |
| #32 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.026375 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 840.3% more | ↑ 378.1% more |
| #33 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.026375 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 840.3% more | ↑ 378.1% more |
| #34 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.026750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 853.7% more | ↑ 384.9% more |
| #35 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.026750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 853.7% more | ↑ 384.9% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.028000 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 898.2% more | ↑ 407.5% more |
| #37 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.051000 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 1718.2% more | ↑ 824.4% more |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.053500 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 1807.3% more | ↑ 869.7% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.064050 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 2183.4% more | ↑ 1061% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.064050 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 2183.4% more | ↑ 1061% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Selecting the right reasoning model for agentic pipelines requires a careful look at how each architecture handles complex, multi-step logic. Both o4-mini and DeepSeek R1 are formidable contenders for back-office automation, but they offer distinct trade-offs for developers managing 10K-token reasoning tasks.
o4-mini is engineered for seamless integration within established enterprise ecosystems. Its strength lies in its predictable tool-use and stable reasoning, which is essential for agents tasked with sensitive operations like legal document review or financial data extraction. It excels when you need a model that follows complex, nested instructions without deviating from the established workflow or safety guidelines. If your priority is reliability and tight cohesion with existing platform tools, this is often the path of least resistance.
Conversely, DeepSeek R1 has carved out a niche as the efficiency king for logic-heavy, open-ended tasks. It is frequently preferred in scenarios where the agent must perform deep research or complex code refactoring, providing high-effort reasoning that can outperform more generalized models on pure logical puzzles. Because it is highly optimized for reasoning, it often delivers high-quality outputs at a significantly lower throughput cost, making it an attractive option for developers who are scaling their agents and are highly sensitive to unit economics.
Ultimately, the decision rests on your infrastructure requirements. Choose o4-mini if your agentic architecture prioritizes vendor-supported tooling and consistency. Pivot to DeepSeek R1 if you are building highly autonomous, logic-intensive agents that can operate effectively on independent reasoning tasks with minimal external dependency.