DeepSeek V4 Flash Cost for 100K Tokens Monthly

Complete Analysis: 103,000 tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash
⚡ 40% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for DeepSeek's DeepSeek V4 Flash model with 40% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 98% savings)
$0.009352 Total Cost
103,000 Total Tokens
2 minutes, 49.73 seconds Processing Time
607 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeekMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$0.14 / $0.28 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
40%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.008400 Input Cost
$0.000840 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
103,000Total Tokens
$0.000091Cost per 1K
11,013,687Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

2m 49s Processing Time
650 Tokens/Second
95ms Time to First Token
607 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek 1000000

$0.009352
Total Cost
⚡ 40% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✗ Not Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✗ Not Available
Caching
✓ Available
98% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.014840 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000840
Optimized Cost $0.009352 Input: $0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000840
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.005488 (rounded ~ $0.01) 37.0% discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 3,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.014000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Output Cost: $0.000840
  • Total Cost: $0.009352
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000091
  • Tokens per dollar: 11,013,687 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 650 tokens per second and 95ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 2 minutes, 49.73 seconds
  • Latency: 95 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 650 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 607 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for high-volumerule-based content generationbulk metadata creationand rapid iteration of SEO-optimized outlines.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for DeepSeek V4 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to DeepSeek V4 Flash
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 100,000
Output Tokens: 3,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 40%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
$0.001825 Best Value ↓ 80.5% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.005125 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 45.2% cheaper
🥉 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.006675 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 28.6% cheaper
#4 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.006675 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 28.6% cheaper
#5 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.009125 ↓ 2.4% cheaper
#6 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.014813 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 58.4% more
#7 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 64.4% more
#8 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.019000 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 103.2% more
#9 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.019750 ↑ 111.2% more
#10 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.020500 ↑ 119.2% more
#11 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.020500 ↑ 119.2% more
#12 o4-mini
OpenAI
$0.020900 ↑ 123.5% more
#13 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.029625 ↑ 216.8% more
#14 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.030750 ↑ 228.8% more
#15 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.038500 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 311.7% more
#16 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.038500 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 311.7% more
#17 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.039500 ↑ 322.4% more
#18 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.051250 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 448% more
#19 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 488.1% more
#20 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.059250 ↑ 533.6% more
#21 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.070000 ↑ 648.5% more
#22 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.070000 ↑ 648.5% more
#23 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.082000 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 776.8% more
#24 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 955.9% more
#25 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 955.9% more
#26 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 955.9% more
#27 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 955.9% more
#28 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 996% more
#29 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 996% more
#30 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 996% more
#31 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 996% more
#32 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.190000 ↑ 1931.7% more
#33 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$0.190000 ↑ 1931.7% more
#34 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$0.190000 ↑ 1931.7% more
#35 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$0.197500 (rounded ~ $0.20) ↑ 2011.8% more
#36 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$0.197500 (rounded ~ $0.20) ↑ 2011.8% more
#37 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.205000 (rounded ~ $0.21) ↑ 2092% more
#38 o3 Pro
OpenAI
$0.380000 ↑ 3963.3% more
#39 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$0.395000 (rounded ~ $0.40) ↑ 4123.7% more
#40 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.462000 (rounded ~ $0.46) ↑ 4840.1% more
#41 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.462000 (rounded ~ $0.46) ↑ 4840.1% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.001825
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 80.5%
🥈

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.005125 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 45.2%
🥉

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.006675 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 28.6%
#4

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.006675 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 28.6%
#5

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.009125
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↓ 2.4%
#6

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.014813 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 58.4%
#7

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.015375 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 64.4%
#8

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.019000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 103.2%
#9

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.019750
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 111.2%
#10

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.020500
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 119.2%
#11

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.020500
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 119.2%
#12

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.020900
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 123.5%
#13

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.029625
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 216.8%
#14

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.030750
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 228.8%
#15

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.038500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 311.7%
#16

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.038500 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 311.7%
#17

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.039500
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 322.4%
#18

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.051250 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 448%
#19

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.055000 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 488.1%
#20

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.059250
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 533.6%
#21

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.070000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 648.5%
#22

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.070000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 648.5%
#23

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.082000 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 776.8%
#24

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 955.9%
#25

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 955.9%
#26

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 955.9%
#27

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 955.9%
#28

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 996%
#29

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 996%
#30

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 996%
#31

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 996%
#32

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.190000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1931.7%
#33

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.190000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1931.7%
#34

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.190000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 1931.7%
#35

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.197500 (rounded ~ $0.20)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2011.8%
#36

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.197500 (rounded ~ $0.20)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2011.8%
#37

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.205000 (rounded ~ $0.21)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 2092%
#38

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.380000
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 3963.3%
#39

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.395000 (rounded ~ $0.40)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 4123.7%
#40

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.462000 (rounded ~ $0.46)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 4840.1%
#41

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.462000 (rounded ~ $0.46)
vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: ↑ 4840.1%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Scaling SEO content creation often involves significant text processing, from generating variations of headlines to summarizing complex technical documentation for blog posts. For technical writers and indie developers looking to maximize their automation efforts without over-committing to high-end frontier models, DeepSeek V4 Flash has emerged as a highly efficient engine for bulk text processing.

The strength of this model lies in its architecture, which is finely tuned for high-throughput tasks where logic must be maintained but at a lower compute intensity than the most expensive reasoning models. In an SEO workflow, this means you can iterate through hundreds of content drafts, topic clusters, or keyword-optimized outlines with a high degree of speed. It is particularly effective for tasks like mass-producing structured variations of content or refining large datasets for SEO-friendly metadata.

Because the model is designed for efficient, large-scale inference, it allows writers to experiment with more aggressive content expansion strategies—such as generating long-form evergreen guides or comprehensive FAQ sections—without the resource constraints that might stop a project using more premium, reasoning-heavy alternatives. For those who prioritize raw output capacity and need a system that can handle repetitive, rule-based generation with consistent performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash serves as an excellent utility for keeping production velocity high while keeping the underlying infrastructure lean.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.