SEO Scaling: 50K-Token Calls for 100M-Token Monthly Pipelines

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5
Complete Comparison: 50,000 input tokens × 3,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens 50,000 50,000
Output Tokens 3,000 3,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)Best $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)Worst
Output Cost $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)Best $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.015938 (rounded ~ $0.02) Best Value $0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) Most Expensive
Processing Time 3 minutes, 6.73 seconds Slowest 2 minutes, 3.46 seconds Fastest
Tokens per Second 304Slowest 460Fastest
Time to First Token 120ms Best 195ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000301Best $0.000401Worst
Tokens per Dollar 3,325,490Best Value 2,494,118Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)Best $0.500000Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $1.875000 (rounded ~ $1.88)Best $2.500000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.250000Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.937500 (rounded ~ $0.94)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$1.250000Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Video Support ✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported
Audio Support ✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported
Caching Support
50
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Gemini 3.6 Flash
GoogleMax Context: 1,048,576 tokens
$1.5 / $7.5 per 1M tokens
▼
▼
Use Batch API (50% discount)
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.015938 Total Cost
$0.009375 Input Cost
$0.005625 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
53,000Total Tokens
$0.000301Cost per 1K
3,325,490Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

3m 6s Processing Time
304 Tokens/Second
120ms Time to First Token
284 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after
🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)
🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier
📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited
🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google 1048576

$0.015938 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✓ Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✓ Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.024375 (rounded ~ $0.02) Input: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Optimized Cost $0.015938 (rounded ~ $0.02) Input: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.008438 (rounded ~ $0.01) 34.6% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 50,000 input tokens and 3,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
  • Output Cost: $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Total Cost: $0.015938 (rounded ~ $0.02)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000301
  • Tokens per dollar: 3,325,490 tokens
  • Context Window: 1048576 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 304 tokens per second and 120ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 3 minutes, 6.73 seconds
  • Latency: 120 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 304 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 284 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for high-volume SEO content generation where balancing throughput costs with nuancedsearch-optimized reasoning is critical.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.6 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Optimized Cost $0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) Input: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01) 34.6% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 50,000 input tokens and 3,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
  • Output Cost: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Total Cost: $0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000401
  • Tokens per dollar: 2,494,118 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 460 tokens per second and 195ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 2 minutes, 3.46 seconds
  • Latency: 195 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 460 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 430 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for high-volume SEO content generation where balancing throughput costs with nuancedsearch-optimized reasoning is critical.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Gemini 3.6 Flash
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 50,000
Output Tokens: 3,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
 $0.000913 Best Value ↓ 94.3% cheaper ↓ 95.7% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.002844 ↓ 82.2% cheaper ↓ 86.6% cheaper
🥉 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
 $0.003938 ↓ 75.3% cheaper ↓ 81.5% cheaper
#4 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.003938 ↓ 75.3% cheaper ↓ 81.5% cheaper
#5 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.004563 ↓ 71.4% cheaper ↓ 78.5% cheaper
#6 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
 $0.007969 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 50% cheaper ↓ 62.5% cheaper
#7 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
 $0.008531 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 46.5% cheaper ↓ 59.9% cheaper
#8 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.009875 ↓ 38% cheaper ↓ 53.5% cheaper
#9 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.010625 ↓ 33.3% cheaper ↓ 50% cheaper
#10 o4-mini
OpenAI
 $0.010863 ↓ 31.8% cheaper ↓ 48.9% cheaper
#11 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 28.6% cheaper ↓ 46.5% cheaper
#12 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
 $0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 28.6% cheaper ↓ 46.5% cheaper
#13 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
 $0.017063 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 7.1% more ↓ 19.7% cheaper
#14 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
 $0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 33.3% more Same price
#15 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
 $0.022531 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 41.4% more ↑ 6% more
#16 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.022531 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 41.4% more ↑ 6% more
#17 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
 $0.028438 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 78.4% more ↑ 33.8% more
#18 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.031875 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 100% more ↑ 50% more
#19 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.032188 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 102% more ↑ 51.5% more
#20 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 110.2% more ↑ 57.6% more
#21 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 110.2% more ↑ 57.6% more
#22 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.045500 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 185.5% more ↑ 114.1% more
#23 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
 $0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 150% more
#24 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
 $0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 150% more
#25 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 150% more
#26 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 150% more
#27 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.056875 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 256.9% more ↑ 167.6% more
#28 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.056875 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 256.9% more ↑ 167.6% more
#29 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.056875 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 256.9% more ↑ 167.6% more
#30 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.056875 (rounded ~ $0.06) ↑ 256.9% more ↑ 167.6% more
#31 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 519.6% more ↑ 364.7% more
#32 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.101563 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 537.3% more ↑ 377.9% more
#33 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.101563 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 537.3% more ↑ 377.9% more
#34 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
 $0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 400% more
#35 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
 $0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 400% more
#36 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.113750 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 613.7% more ↑ 435.3% more
#37 o3 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.197500 (rounded ~ $0.20) ↑ 1139.2% more ↑ 829.4% more
#38 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $0.212500 (rounded ~ $0.21) ↑ 1233.3% more ↑ 900% more
#39 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.270375 ↑ 1596.5% more ↑ 1172.4% more
#40 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.270375 ↑ 1596.5% more ↑ 1172.4% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.000913
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 94.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 95.7%
🥈

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.002844
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 82.2%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 86.6%
🥉

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.003938
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 75.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 81.5%
#4

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.003938
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 75.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 81.5%
#5

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.004563
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 71.4%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 78.5%
#6

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.007969 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 50%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 62.5%
#7

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.008531 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 46.5%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 59.9%
#8

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.009875
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 38%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 53.5%
#9

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.010625
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 33.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 50%
#10

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.010863
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 31.8%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 48.9%
#11

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 28.6%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 46.5%
#12

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 28.6%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 46.5%
#13

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.017063 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 7.1%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 19.7%
#14

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 33.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: Same
#15

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.022531 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 41.4%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 6%
#16

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.022531 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 41.4%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 6%
#17

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.028438 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 78.4%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 33.8%
#18

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.031875 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 100%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 50%
#19

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.032188 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 102%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 51.5%
#20

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 110.2%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 57.6%
#21

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 110.2%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 57.6%
#22

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.045500 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 185.5%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 114.1%
#23

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%
#24

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%
#25

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%
#26

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.053125 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%
#27

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.056875 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 256.9%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 167.6%
#28

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.056875 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 256.9%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 167.6%
#29

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.056875 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 256.9%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 167.6%
#30

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.056875 (rounded ~ $0.06)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 256.9%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 167.6%
#31

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 519.6%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 364.7%
#32

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.101563 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 537.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 377.9%
#33

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.101563 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 537.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 377.9%
#34

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 400%
#35

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.106250 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 400%
#36

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.113750 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 613.7%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 435.3%
#37

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.197500 (rounded ~ $0.20)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1139.2%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 829.4%
#38

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.212500 (rounded ~ $0.21)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1233.3%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 900%
#39

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.270375
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1596.5%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 1172.4%
#40

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.270375
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1596.5%
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 1172.4%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

SEO content teams generating 100M tokens monthly face a clear trade-off between throughput efficiency and linguistic quality. When scaling production to this level, the cost structure dictates that every token counts, making model selection a critical architectural decision.

Gemini 3.6 Flash has emerged as a powerhouse for these high-volume pipelines. Its native multimodal capabilities allow it to process reference images or search data alongside text without needing external orchestration, which reduces latency and complexity. For standardized blog posts or category pages where structural consistency is more important than creative flair, its processing efficiency is difficult to beat at scale.

Conversely, Claude Sonnet 5 is the preferred choice when the content mandate requires higher reasoning depths—such as in-depth guides, technical documentation, or nuanced industry analysis. The thinking capabilities within Claude enable it to synthesize complex instructions better than standard models, reducing the need for aggressive human post-editing. If your SEO strategy relies on depth to satisfy search intent, the extra investment in Claude’s reasoning pays off through reduced churn and higher page-one ranking potential.

For enterprise architects, the decision often splits: use Gemini for high-throughput, templated content where cost minimization is the primary KPI, and reserve Claude for hero content that must stand out against manual competitors. Leveraging the batch API across both providers is essential to maintaining these volumes while ensuring your infrastructure remains performant and within budget.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Related model pricing

Gemini 3.6 Flash currently costs $1.50 / $7.50 per 1M tokens. These are the models worth pricing against it, taken live from the tracked registry.

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

See every tracked AI pricing change →