Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.050000
- Output Cost: $0.005000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.043750 (rounded ~ $0.04)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000429
- Tokens per dollar: 2,331,429 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 460 tokens per second and 195ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 57.44 seconds
- Latency: 195 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 460 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 430 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI 1024000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.180000
Output: $0.180000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $1.500000
- Output Cost: $0.180000
- Total Cost: $1.342500 (rounded ~ $1.34)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.013162 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Tokens per dollar: 75,978 tokens
- Context Window: 1024000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 350 tokens per second and 250ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 5 minutes, 12.01 seconds
- Latency: 250 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 350 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 327 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Sonnet 5| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Sonnet 5 | vs GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.002088 Best Value | ↓ 95.2% cheaper | ↓ 99.8% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.005594 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 87.2% cheaper | ↓ 99.6% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.007063 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 83.9% cheaper | ↓ 99.5% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.007063 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 83.9% cheaper | ↓ 99.5% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.010438 | ↓ 76.1% cheaper | ↓ 99.2% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.016406 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 62.5% cheaper | ↓ 98.8% cheaper |
| #7 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.016781 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 61.6% cheaper | ↓ 98.8% cheaper |
| #8 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.021375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 51.1% cheaper | ↓ 98.4% cheaper |
| #9 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 50% cheaper | ↓ 98.4% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.022375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 48.9% cheaper | ↓ 98.3% cheaper |
| #11 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.022375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 48.9% cheaper | ↓ 98.3% cheaper |
| #12 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.023513 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 46.3% cheaper | ↓ 98.2% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.032813 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 25% cheaper | ↓ 97.6% cheaper |
| #14 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.033563 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 23.3% cheaper | ↓ 97.5% cheaper |
| #15 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.040906 | ↓ 6.5% cheaper | ↓ 97% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.040906 | ↓ 6.5% cheaper | ↓ 97% cheaper |
| #17 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.055938 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 27.9% more | ↓ 95.8% cheaper |
| #18 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.058438 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 33.6% more | ↓ 95.6% cheaper |
| #19 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.065625 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 50% more | ↓ 95.1% cheaper |
| #20 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.081500 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 86.3% more | ↓ 93.9% cheaper |
| #21 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.081500 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 86.3% more | ↓ 93.9% cheaper |
| #22 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.089500 | ↑ 104.6% more | ↓ 93.3% cheaper |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.109375 | ↑ 150% more | ↓ 91.9% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.109375 | ↑ 150% more | ↓ 91.9% cheaper |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.109375 | ↑ 150% more | ↓ 91.9% cheaper |
| #26 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.109375 | ↑ 150% more | ↓ 91.9% cheaper |
| #27 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.111875 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 155.7% more | ↓ 91.7% cheaper |
| #28 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.111875 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 155.7% more | ↓ 91.7% cheaper |
| #29 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.111875 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 155.7% more | ↓ 91.7% cheaper |
| #30 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.111875 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 155.7% more | ↓ 91.7% cheaper |
| #31 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.213750 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 388.6% more | ↓ 84.1% cheaper |
| #32 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.214063 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 389.3% more | ↓ 84.1% cheaper |
| #33 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.214063 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 389.3% more | ↓ 84.1% cheaper |
| #34 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.218750 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↑ 400% more | ↓ 83.7% cheaper |
| #35 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.218750 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↑ 400% more | ↓ 83.7% cheaper |
| #36 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.223750 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↑ 411.4% more | ↓ 83.3% cheaper |
| #37 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.427500 (rounded ~ $0.43) | ↑ 877.1% more | ↓ 68.2% cheaper |
| #38 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.437500 (rounded ~ $0.44) | ↑ 900% more | ↓ 67.4% cheaper |
| #39 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.490875 | ↑ 1022% more | ↓ 63.4% cheaper |
| #40 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.490875 | ↑ 1022% more | ↓ 63.4% cheaper |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
For video script production, the choice between Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.4 Pro often hinges on the specific creative nuance required versus the need for strict logical adherence. Claude Sonnet 5 has established itself as a premier choice for creative writing and long-form narrative content. Its ability to maintain a consistent voice, handle subtle character motivations, and follow complex, multi-part creative briefs makes it ideal for scripts that demand high emotional resonance or intricate storytelling. It feels naturally geared toward nuanced prose.
GPT-5.4 Pro, conversely, excels in environments where the script must strictly adhere to specific structural rules, technical constraints, or data-driven inputs. If your video production workflow involves heavy research, factual integration, or requires the model to act as a structured logic engine before shifting into creative mode, GPT-5.4 Pro provides a more robust and predictable output. It is highly effective at following rigid formatting instructions, which can save substantial time during the post-production assembly phase. When deciding between the two, consider whether your priority is the ‘human’ quality of the narrative or the precision of the technical execution. Claude Sonnet 5 is the stronger contender for pure creative output, while GPT-5.4 Pro is the better partner for technical or factual content where consistency is paramount.