Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.4 mini for 10,000 Token Marketing Campaigns

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.4 mini
Complete Comparison: 10,000 input tokens × 2,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens 10,000 10,000
Output Tokens 2,000 2,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.003750Worst $0.001875Best
Output Cost $0.003750Worst $0.002250Best
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.005813 (rounded ~ $0.01) Most Expensive $0.003281 Best Value
Processing Time 42.42 seconds Slowest 25.86 seconds Fastest
Tokens per Second 304Slowest 500Fastest
Time to First Token 120ms Best 180ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000484Worst $0.000273Best
Tokens per Dollar 2,064,516Worst Value 3,657,143Best Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)Worst $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Best
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $1.875000 (rounded ~ $1.88)Worst $1.125000 (rounded ~ $1.13)Best
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.937500 (rounded ~ $0.94)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.562500 (rounded ~ $0.56)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Video Support ✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported
Audio Support ✓ Supported ✗ Not Supported
Caching Support
50
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Gemini 3.6 Flash
GoogleMax Context: 1,048,576 tokens
$1.5 / $7.5 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.001875 Input Cost
$0.003750 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
12,000Total Tokens
$0.000484Cost per 1K
2,064,516Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

42.42s Processing Time
304 Tokens/Second
120ms Time to First Token
284 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google 1048576

$0.005813 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✓ Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✓ Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.003750
Output: $0.003750
Optimized Cost $0.005813 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.003750
Output: $0.003750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.001688 22.5% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 10,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.003750
  • Output Cost: $0.003750
  • Total Cost: $0.005813 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000484
  • Tokens per dollar: 2,064,516 tokens
  • Context Window: 1048576 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 304 tokens per second and 120ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 42.42 seconds
  • Latency: 120 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 304 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 284 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash for multimodal-aware marketing copy; use GPT-5.4 mini for high-speedtext-centric copy generation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.6 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

$0.003281
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.004125 Input: $0.001875
Output: $0.002250
Optimized Cost $0.003281 Input: $0.001875
Output: $0.002250
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.000844 20.5% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 10,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.001875
  • Output Cost: $0.002250
  • Total Cost: $0.003281
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000273
  • Tokens per dollar: 3,657,143 tokens
  • Context Window: 400000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 25.86 seconds
  • Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 467 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash for multimodal-aware marketing copy; use GPT-5.4 mini for high-speedtext-centric copy generation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Gemini 3.6 Flash
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 10,000
Output Tokens: 2,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.4 mini
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
$0.000288 Best Value ↓ 95.1% cheaper ↓ 91.2% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.001094 ↓ 81.2% cheaper ↓ 66.7% cheaper
🥉 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.001438 ↓ 75.3% cheaper ↓ 56.2% cheaper
#4 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.001663 ↓ 71.4% cheaper ↓ 49.3% cheaper
#5 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.001663 ↓ 71.4% cheaper ↓ 49.3% cheaper
#6 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.002906 ↓ 50% cheaper ↓ 11.4% cheaper
#7 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.003281 ↓ 43.5% cheaper Same price
#8 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.003375 ↓ 41.9% cheaper ↑ 2.9% more
#9 o4-mini
OpenAI
$0.003713 ↓ 36.1% cheaper ↑ 13.1% more
#10 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.003875 ↓ 33.3% cheaper ↑ 18.1% more
#11 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.004375 ↓ 24.7% cheaper ↑ 33.3% more
#12 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.004375 ↓ 24.7% cheaper ↑ 33.3% more
#13 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.006563 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 12.9% more ↑ 100% more
#14 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.007750 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 33.3% more ↑ 136.2% more
#15 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
$0.009406 ↑ 61.8% more ↑ 186.7% more
#16 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
$0.009406 ↑ 61.8% more ↑ 186.7% more
#17 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.009500 ↑ 63.4% more ↑ 189.5% more
#18 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.009500 ↑ 63.4% more ↑ 189.5% more
#19 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.010938 ↑ 88.2% more ↑ 233.3% more
#20 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.011625 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 100% more ↑ 254.3% more
#21 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.013438 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 131.2% more ↑ 309.5% more
#22 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.017500 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 201.1% more ↑ 433.3% more
#23 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.019375 ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 490.5% more
#24 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$0.019375 ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 490.5% more
#25 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.019375 ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 490.5% more
#26 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.019375 ↑ 233.3% more ↑ 490.5% more
#27 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 276.3% more ↑ 566.7% more
#28 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 276.3% more ↑ 566.7% more
#29 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 276.3% more ↑ 566.7% more
#30 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 276.3% more ↑ 566.7% more
#31 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
$0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 480.6% more ↑ 928.6% more
#32 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$0.037813 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 550.5% more ↑ 1052.4% more
#33 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$0.037813 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 550.5% more ↑ 1052.4% more
#34 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$0.038750 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 1081% more
#35 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$0.038750 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 566.7% more ↑ 1081% more
#36 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.043750 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↑ 652.7% more ↑ 1233.3% more
#37 o3 Pro
OpenAI
$0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↑ 1061.3% more ↑ 1957.1% more
#38 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$0.077500 (rounded ~ $0.08) ↑ 1233.3% more ↑ 2261.9% more
#39 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.112875 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 1841.9% more ↑ 3340% more
#40 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
$0.112875 (rounded ~ $0.11) ↑ 1841.9% more ↑ 3340% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.000288
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 95.1%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 91.2%
🥈

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.001094
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 81.2%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 66.7%
🥉

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.001438
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 75.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 56.2%
#4

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.001663
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 71.4%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 49.3%
#5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.001663
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 71.4%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 49.3%
#6

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.002906
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 50%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 11.4%
#7

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.003281
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 43.5%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: Same
#8

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.003375
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 41.9%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 2.9%
#9

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.003713
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 36.1%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 13.1%
#10

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.003875
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 33.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 18.1%
#11

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.004375
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 24.7%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 33.3%
#12

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.004375
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 24.7%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 33.3%
#13

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.006563 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 12.9%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 100%
#14

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.007750 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 33.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 136.2%
#15

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.009406
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 61.8%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 186.7%
#16

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.009406
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 61.8%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 186.7%
#17

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.009500
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 63.4%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 189.5%
#18

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.009500
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 63.4%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 189.5%
#19

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.010938
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 88.2%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 233.3%
#20

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.011625 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 100%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 254.3%
#21

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.013438 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 131.2%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 309.5%
#22

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.017500 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 201.1%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 433.3%
#23

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.019375
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 490.5%
#24

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.019375
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 490.5%
#25

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.019375
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 490.5%
#26

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.019375
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 233.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 490.5%
#27

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 276.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 566.7%
#28

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 276.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 566.7%
#29

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 276.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 566.7%
#30

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 276.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 566.7%
#31

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 480.6%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 928.6%
#32

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.037813 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 550.5%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1052.4%
#33

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.037813 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 550.5%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1052.4%
#34

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.038750 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1081%
#35

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.038750 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1081%
#36

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.043750 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 652.7%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1233.3%
#37

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1061.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1957.1%
#38

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.077500 (rounded ~ $0.08)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1233.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 2261.9%
#39

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.112875 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1841.9%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 3340%
#40

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.112875 (rounded ~ $0.11)
vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1841.9%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 3340%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

When scaling marketing copy A/B testing to 10,000 token variations, choosing between Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-5.4 mini comes down to your primary bottleneck. Gemini 3.6 Flash shines in multimodal-heavy environments; if your campaign variations require the model to ingest visual assets or charts to inform the copy, this model provides a cohesive, integrated pipeline. Its architecture is tuned for rapid, high-throughput tasks, making it an excellent choice for teams that need to iterate on visual-textual consistency without incurring the latency penalties of larger frontier models. In contrast, GPT-5.4 mini is optimized for lean, text-centric agentic loops. If your marketing engine relies on structured API calls to generate and refine headlines or ad body copy in rapid succession, the efficiency and speed of this model are difficult to beat. It is particularly adept at handling complex instruction sets in a single pass, which is a significant advantage when the goal is to maintain specific brand constraints across thousands of variations. Engineers should evaluate whether their workload prioritizes the visual context-awareness of Gemini or the raw, text-based reasoning density of GPT-5.4 mini. Both models offer reliable performance at this scale, ensuring that your IVR or voice agent backends maintain sub-second response times while delivering high-quality, varied marketing content to your audience.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.