What are cached tokens and how do they save money?

Cached tokens are repeated input tokens (like system prompts or conversation history) that providers charge at a discounted rate. Anthropic offers varying discounts for cached tokens (typically 50-80%). Your calculation saves money by applying caching to 60% of input tokens for optimized cost savings.

When should I use Batch API vs real-time API?

Use Batch API for non-realtime processing of large volumes where latency isn't critical (saves up to 40-60%). Use real-time API for interactive applications like chatbots. Batch processing is ideal for data analysis, content generation in bulk, and offline processing.

What should I consider when comparing different AI models?

When comparing AI models, focus on factors such as performance, accuracy, response speed, cost, scalability, and how well the model fits your specific use case. The right choice depends on your workload, budget, and the type of tasks you want the AI to handle. Using an AI cost and time calculator can help you make an informed, data-driven decision.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash for 100M-Token Enterprise Email Pipelines

Name: Gemini 3.6 Flash
Brand: Google
Rating: 4.5 (89 reviews)

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Complete Comparison: 1,000 input tokens × 600 output tokens

⚡ 60% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 60% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API

Comparison Criteria	Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (60% cached)
Input Tokens	1,000	1,000
Output Tokens	600	600
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost	$0.000500Worst	$0.000188Best
Output Cost	$0.001500Worst	$0.000563Best
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR)	$0.000000	$0.000000
Service Fees	$0.000000	$0.000000
Total Cost	$0.001730 Most Expensive	$0.000649 Best Value
Processing Time	3.90 seconds Fastest	5.81 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second	460Fastest	304Slowest
Time to First Token	195ms Worst	120ms Best
Cost per 1K tokens	$0.001081Worst	$0.000405Best
Tokens per Dollar	924,855Worst Value	2,466,281Best Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base)	$0.500000Worst	$0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Best
Output Cost / 1M (Base)	$2.500000Worst	$0.937500 (rounded ~ $0.94)Best
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.250000Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$1.250000Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.468750 (rounded ~ $0.47)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Video Support	✗ Not Supported	✓ Supported
Audio Support	✗ Not Supported	✓ Supported
Caching Support 60	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Batch API Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported

Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Provider

Model

Second Model

Provider

Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.001730

Total Cost

⚡ 60% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.002000 Input: $0.000500
Output: $0.001500

Optimized Cost $0.001730 Input: $0.000500
Output: $0.001500
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.000270 13.5% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 1,000 input tokens and 600 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.000500
Output Cost: $0.001500
Total Cost: $0.001730
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001081
Tokens per dollar: 924,855 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 460 tokens per second and 195ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 3.90 seconds
Latency: 195 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 460 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 430 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Sonnet 5 for high-touchcomplex personalization; use Gemini 3.6 Flash for high-throughputstandardized email automation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google 1048576

$0.000649

Total Cost

⚡ 60% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✓ Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✓ Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.000750 Input: $0.000188
Output: $0.000563

Optimized Cost $0.000649 Input: $0.000188
Output: $0.000563
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.000101 13.5% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 1,000 input tokens and 600 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.000188
Output Cost: $0.000563
Total Cost: $0.000649
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000405
Tokens per dollar: 2,466,281 tokens
Context Window: 1048576 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 304 tokens per second and 120ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 5.81 seconds
Latency: 120 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 304 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 284 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Sonnet 5 for high-touchcomplex personalization; use Gemini 3.6 Flash for high-throughputstandardized email automation.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.6 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 5

📋 Active Input Parameters

Input Tokens: 1,000

Output Tokens: 600

Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)

Cached Tokens: 60%

Tools: Enabled

Rank	AI Model & Provider	Total Cost	vs Claude Sonnet 5	vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
🏆	Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic	$0.000173 Best Value	↓ 90% cheaper	↓ 73.3% cheaper
🥈	GPT-6 Luna OpenAI	$0.000173	↓ 90% cheaper	↓ 73.3% cheaper
🥉	GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI	$0.000203	↓ 88.3% cheaper	↓ 68.7% cheaper
#4	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google	$0.000254	↓ 85.3% cheaper	↓ 60.9% cheaper
#5	Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI	$0.000283	↓ 83.7% cheaper	↓ 56.5% cheaper
#6	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google	$0.000410	↓ 76.3% cheaper	↓ 36.9% cheaper
#7	Gemini 2.5 Flash Google	$0.000410	↓ 76.3% cheaper	↓ 36.9% cheaper
#8	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	$0.000649	↓ 62.5% cheaper	Same price
#9	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google	$0.000649	↓ 62.5% cheaper	Same price
#10	GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI	$0.000761	↓ 56% cheaper	↑ 17.3% more
#11	Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI	$0.000783	↓ 54.7% cheaper	↑ 20.8% more
#12	Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic	$0.000865	↓ 50% cheaper	↑ 33.3% more
#13	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google	$0.001015	↓ 41.3% cheaper	↑ 56.5% more
#14	Grok 4.3 xAI	$0.001660	↓ 4% cheaper	↑ 155.9% more
#15	Grok 4.20 Beta xAI	$0.001660	↓ 4% cheaper	↑ 155.9% more
#16	Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic	$0.001715	↓ 0.9% cheaper	↑ 164.4% more
#17	Gemini 4 Argon Google	$0.001730	Same price	↑ 166.7% more
#18	GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI	$0.002030	↑ 17.3% more	↑ 212.9% more
#19	GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI	$0.002301	↑ 33% more	↑ 254.7% more
#20	GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI	$0.002301	↑ 33% more	↑ 254.7% more
#21	Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	$0.002595	↑ 50% more	↑ 300% more
#22	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	$0.003288	↑ 90% more	↑ 406.7% more
#23	Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic	$0.003430	↑ 98.3% more	↑ 428.7% more
#24	GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI	$0.003460	↑ 100% more	↑ 433.3% more
#25	GPT-6 Sol OpenAI	$0.003460	↑ 100% more	↑ 433.3% more
#26	GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI	$0.003460	↑ 100% more	↑ 433.3% more
#27	Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	$0.004060	↑ 134.7% more	↑ 525.8% more
#28	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic	$0.004325	↑ 150% more	↑ 566.7% more
#29	Claude Opus 5 Anthropic	$0.004325	↑ 150% more	↑ 566.7% more
#30	Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	$0.004325	↑ 150% more	↑ 566.7% more
#31	Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	$0.004325	↑ 150% more	↑ 566.7% more
#32	GPT-5.4 OpenAI	$0.005075 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 193.4% more	↑ 682.3% more
#33	GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI	$0.005075 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 193.4% more	↑ 682.3% more
#34	GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI	$0.005075 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 193.4% more	↑ 682.3% more
#35	Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic	$0.008538 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 393.5% more	↑ 1216% more
#36	Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic	$0.008538 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 393.5% more	↑ 1216% more
#37	Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	$0.008650 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 400% more	↑ 1233.3% more
#38	Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	$0.008650 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 400% more	↑ 1233.3% more
#39	GPT-5.5 OpenAI	$0.010150	↑ 486.7% more	↑ 1464.5% more
#40	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$0.017300 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 900% more	↑ 2566.7% more
#41	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.027615 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↑ 1496.2% more	↑ 4156.6% more
#42	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.027615 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↑ 1496.2% more	↑ 4156.6% more

🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

$0.000173

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 90%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 73.3%

🥈

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.000173

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 90%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 73.3%

🥉

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.000203

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 88.3%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 68.7%

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.000254

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 85.3%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 60.9%

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.000283

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 83.7%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 56.5%

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.000410

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 76.3%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 36.9%

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.000410

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 76.3%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 36.9%

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.000649

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 62.5%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Same

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.000649

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 62.5%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Same

#10

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.000761

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 56%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 17.3%

#11

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

$0.000783

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 54.7%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 20.8%

#12

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.000865

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 50%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 33.3%

#13

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.001015

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 41.3%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 56.5%

#14

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.001660

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 155.9%

#15

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.001660

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 155.9%

#16

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic

$0.001715

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 0.9%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 164.4%

#17

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

$0.001730

vs Claude Sonnet 5: Same

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 166.7%

#18

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.002030

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 17.3%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 212.9%

#19

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.002301

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 33%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 254.7%

#20

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.002301

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 33%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 254.7%

#21

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.002595

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 50%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 300%

#22

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.003288

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 90%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 406.7%

#23

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

$0.003430

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 98.3%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 428.7%

#24

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

$0.003460

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 100%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 433.3%

#25

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.003460

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 100%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 433.3%

#26

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.003460

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 100%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 433.3%

#27

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.004060

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 134.7%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 525.8%

#28

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.004325

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#29

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.004325

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#30

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.004325

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#31

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.004325

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#32

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.005075 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 193.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 682.3%

#33

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.005075 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 193.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 682.3%

#34

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.005075 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 193.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 682.3%

#35

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.008538 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 393.5%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1216%

#36

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.008538 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 393.5%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1216%

#37

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.008650 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 400%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1233.3%

#38

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.008650 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 400%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1233.3%

#39

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.010150

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 486.7%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1464.5%

#40

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.017300 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 900%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 2566.7%

#41

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.027615 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 1496.2%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 4156.6%

#42

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.027615 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 1496.2%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 4156.6%

✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Deploying large-scale email personalization requires balancing high-fidelity reasoning with operational throughput. For enterprise customer support and marketing teams generating millions of personalized communications, selecting the right model often comes down to the specific requirements of the drafting task.

Claude Sonnet 5 excels in scenarios where email content must adhere to strict brand guidelines or complex, multi-variable logic. Its architectural strength lies in its ability to maintain context over long, nuanced conversational threads, ensuring that personalized outreach feels authentic rather than templated. This makes it a preferred choice for high-touch customer retention campaigns where the cost of a tone-deaf response is significant.

Conversely, Gemini 3.6 Flash is engineered for extreme efficiency at scale. When the primary objective is high-volume, low-latency text generation—such as transactional notifications or standardized follow-ups—Gemini 3.6 Flash provides a significant throughput advantage. Its capabilities are particularly well-suited for automated pipelines that process vast amounts of unstructured data to populate dynamic fields, allowing for rapid iterations without sacrificing structural integrity.

For teams managing enterprise-grade workloads, the decision often hinges on whether your priority is ‘reasoning depth’ or ‘pipeline velocity.’ Claude Sonnet 5 offers the sophisticated reasoning necessary for complex, high-value outreach, while Gemini 3.6 Flash provides the speed and volume capacity required for high-frequency, standardized communications. Evaluating your team’s specific latency needs versus the requirement for nuanced personalization is essential when building your infrastructure for 100M-token monthly volumes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?

Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.

How does prompt caching work?

Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.

How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?

Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.

What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?

The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash for 100M-Token Enterprise Email Pipelines

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Second Model

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 5

Calculate Token Costs

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

Model Comparison

Model Information

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google 1048576

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google

Grok 4.3 xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta xAI

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon Google

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

Frequently Asked Questions

Related model pricing

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

Grok 4.3
xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI