Marketing Copy A/B Testing: Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4 Pro for 200K-Token Batches

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4 Pro
Complete Comparison: 200,000 input tokens × 5,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
GPT-5.4 Pro
OpenAI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens 200,000 200,000
Output Tokens 5,000 5,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.100000Best $3.000000Worst
Output Cost $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)Best $0.450000Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07) Best Value $2.100000 Most Expensive
Processing Time 7 minutes, 57.03 seconds Fastest 10 minutes, 26.89 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second 460Fastest 350Slowest
Time to First Token 195ms Best 250ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000329Best $0.010244Worst
Tokens per Dollar 3,037,037Best Value 97,619Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.500000Best $15.000000Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $2.500000Best $90.000000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.250000Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$7.500000Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $1.250000Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$45.000000Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Caching Support
50
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Sonnet 5
AnthropicMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$2 / $10 per 1M tokens
▼
▼
Use Batch API (50% discount)
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.067500 Total Cost
$0.050000 Input Cost
$0.012500 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
205,000Total Tokens
$0.000329Cost per 1K
3,037,037Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

7m 57s Processing Time
460 Tokens/Second
195ms Time to First Token
430 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after
🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)
🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier
📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited
🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.112500 (rounded ~ $0.11) Input: $0.100000
Output: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Optimized Cost $0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07) Input: $0.100000
Output: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05) 40.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 200,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.100000
  • Output Cost: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
  • Total Cost: $0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000329
  • Tokens per dollar: 3,037,037 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 460 tokens per second and 195ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 7 minutes, 57.03 seconds
  • Latency: 195 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 460 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 430 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 5 for brand-heavycreative consistency. Use GPT-5.4 Pro for agentic workflows involving real-time data retrieval.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Sonnet 5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI 1024000

$2.100000
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $3.450000 Input: $3.000000
Output: $0.450000
Optimized Cost $2.100000 Input: $3.000000
Output: $0.450000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $1.350000 39.1% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount
📊 Cliff Pricing
Standard
standard pricing (threshold: 272,000)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 200,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $3.000000
  • Output Cost: $0.450000
  • Total Cost: $2.100000
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.010244
  • Tokens per dollar: 97,619 tokens
  • Context Window: 1024000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 350 tokens per second and 250ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 10 minutes, 26.89 seconds
  • Latency: 250 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 350 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 327 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Choose Claude Sonnet 5 for brand-heavycreative consistency. Use GPT-5.4 Pro for agentic workflows involving real-time data retrieval.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Sonnet 5
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 200,000
Output Tokens: 5,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4 Pro
🏆 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.008750 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value ↓ 87% cheaper ↓ 99.6% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
 $0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 83.1% cheaper ↓ 99.5% cheaper
🥉 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 83.1% cheaper ↓ 99.5% cheaper
#4 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.015625 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 76.9% cheaper ↓ 99.3% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
 $0.025313 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 62.5% cheaper ↓ 98.8% cheaper
#6 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
 $0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 61.1% cheaper ↓ 98.8% cheaper
#7 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 50% cheaper ↓ 98.4% cheaper
#8 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
 $0.035000 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↓ 48.1% cheaper ↓ 98.3% cheaper
#9 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
 $0.050625 ↓ 25% cheaper ↓ 97.6% cheaper
#10 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
 $0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↓ 22.2% cheaper ↓ 97.5% cheaper
#11 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.070000 ↑ 3.7% more ↓ 96.7% cheaper
#12 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
 $0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 29.6% more ↓ 95.8% cheaper
#13 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 50% more ↓ 95.2% cheaper
#14 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
 $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) ↑ 150% more ↓ 92% cheaper
#15 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
 $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) ↑ 150% more ↓ 92% cheaper
#16 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) ↑ 150% more ↓ 92% cheaper
#17 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) ↑ 150% more ↓ 92% cheaper
#18 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 159.3% more ↓ 91.7% cheaper
#19 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 159.3% more ↓ 91.7% cheaper
#20 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 159.3% more ↓ 91.7% cheaper
#21 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 159.3% more ↓ 91.7% cheaper
#22 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 159.3% more ↓ 91.7% cheaper
#23 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.240000 ↑ 255.6% more ↓ 88.6% cheaper
#24 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.240000 ↑ 255.6% more ↓ 88.6% cheaper
#25 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.265000 (rounded ~ $0.27) ↑ 292.6% more ↓ 87.4% cheaper
#26 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32) ↑ 372.2% more ↓ 84.8% cheaper
#27 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32) ↑ 372.2% more ↓ 84.8% cheaper
#28 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
 $0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34) ↑ 400% more ↓ 83.9% cheaper
#29 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
 $0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34) ↑ 400% more ↓ 83.9% cheaper
#30 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.662500 (rounded ~ $0.66) ↑ 881.5% more ↓ 68.5% cheaper
#31 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $1.350000 ↑ 1900% more ↓ 35.7% cheaper
#32 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $1.350000 ↑ 1900% more ↓ 35.7% cheaper
🏆

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.008750 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 87%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 99.6%
🥈

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 83.1%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 99.5%
🥉

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 83.1%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 99.5%
#4

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.015625 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 76.9%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 99.3%
#5

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.025313 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 62.5%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 98.8%
#6

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 61.1%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 98.8%
#7

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 50%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 98.4%
#8

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.035000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 48.1%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 98.3%
#9

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.050625
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 25%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 97.6%
#10

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↓ 22.2%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 97.5%
#11

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.070000
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 3.7%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 96.7%
#12

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 29.6%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 95.8%
#13

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 50%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 95.2%
#14

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 92%
#15

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 92%
#16

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 92%
#17

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 150%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 92%
#18

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 159.3%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 91.7%
#19

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 159.3%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 91.7%
#20

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 159.3%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 91.7%
#21

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 159.3%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 91.7%
#22

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 159.3%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 91.7%
#23

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.240000
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 255.6%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 88.6%
#24

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.240000
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 255.6%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 88.6%
#25

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.265000 (rounded ~ $0.27)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 292.6%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 87.4%
#26

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 372.2%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 84.8%
#27

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 372.2%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 84.8%
#28

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 400%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 83.9%
#29

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 400%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 83.9%
#30

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.662500 (rounded ~ $0.66)
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 881.5%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 68.5%
#31

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$1.350000
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 1900%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 35.7%
#32

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$1.350000
vs Claude Sonnet 5: ↑ 1900%
vs GPT-5.4 Pro: ↓ 35.7%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For marketing teams managing high-frequency A/B testing pipelines, choosing the right model for content generation involves balancing nuanced creative output with rigid structural consistency. When generating 20 variations of every campaign, engineering teams must decide between the specialized strengths of Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.4 Pro.

Claude Sonnet 5 excels in environments where brand voice preservation is paramount. Its updated tokenizer and native agentic planning allow it to maintain consistent tone across multiple variations, making it a reliable partner for complex, multi-stage creative tasks where minor deviations in style could impact brand integrity. It is particularly effective for teams that require high-fidelity adherence to specific brand guidelines when spinning up dozens of localized copy iterations.

Conversely, GPT-5.4 Pro offers a distinct advantage in reasoning-heavy, dynamic A/B test environments. Its native computer-use capabilities and tool-search efficiency make it a superior choice when copy generation is coupled with external data retrieval, such as pulling real-time customer sentiment or performance data to inform the variations. For teams that need the model to do more than just write—like navigating internal dashboards to find the latest conversion metrics before generating the next set of A/B variations—GPT-5.4 Pro provides a more robust, integrated workflow. Ultimately, the decision rests on whether your pipeline prioritizes strict stylistic adherence or high-level reasoning and data-driven adaptation. Both models handle the 200K-token batch threshold efficiently, but their operational fit varies based on your existing infrastructure and the degree of autonomy you require from your copy generation agents.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Related model pricing

Claude Sonnet 5 currently costs $2.00 / $10.00 per 1M tokens. These are the models worth pricing against it, taken live from the tracked registry.

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

See every tracked AI pricing change →