Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000750
Output: $0.000750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 10,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.002000
- Output Cost: $0.000750
- Total Cost: $0.001400
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000133
- Tokens per dollar: 7,500,000 tokens
- Context Window: 256000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 700 tokens per second and 110ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 16.23 seconds
- Latency: 110 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 700 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 654 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Grok Code Fast 1. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Grok Code Fast 1| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Grok Code Fast 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.000575 Best Value | ↓ 58.9% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.000575 | ↓ 58.9% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.001250 | ↓ 10.7% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.001563 | ↑ 11.6% more |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.002225 | ↑ 58.9% more |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.002225 | ↑ 58.9% more |
| #7 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.002375 | ↑ 69.6% more |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.003125 | ↑ 123.2% more |
| #9 |
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
|
$0.004250 | ↑ 203.6% more |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.004313 | ↑ 208% more |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.004313 | ↑ 208% more |
| #12 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.004688 | ↑ 234.8% more |
| #13 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.005313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 279.5% more |
| #14 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.005313 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 279.5% more |
| #15 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.005750 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 310.7% more |
| #16 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.006510 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 365% more |
| #17 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.009063 | ↑ 547.3% more |
| #18 |
Grok 4.7
xAI
|
$0.009500 | ↑ 578.6% more |
| #19 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$0.009500 | ↑ 578.6% more |
| #20 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$0.009500 | ↑ 578.6% more |
| #21 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.010750 | ↑ 667.9% more |
| #22 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.011500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 721.4% more |
| #23 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.011500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 721.4% more |
| #24 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.011500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 721.4% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.011500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 721.4% more |
| #26 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 792.9% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 792.9% more |
| #28 |
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
|
$0.012550 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 796.4% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.012688 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 806.3% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.012688 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 806.3% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.015625 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 1016.1% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.015625 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 1016.1% more |
| #33 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.017250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 1132.1% more |
| #34 |
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
|
$0.018825 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 1244.6% more |
| #35 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.021500 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 1435.7% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.023000 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 1542.9% more |
| #37 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 1953.6% more |
| #38 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 1953.6% more |
| #39 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 1953.6% more |
| #40 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 1953.6% more |
| #41 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 2132.1% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 2132.1% more |
| #43 |
Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta AI
|
$0.050000 | ↑ 3471.4% more |
| #44 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.051875 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 3605.4% more |
| #45 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.051875 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 3605.4% more |
| #46 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 4007.1% more |
| #47 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 4007.1% more |
| #48 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 4007.1% more |
| #49 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.152250 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 10775% more |
| #50 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.152250 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 10775% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Grok Build 0.1 xAI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Grok 4.7 xAI
Grok 4.6 xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Kimi K3.1 Pro Moonshot AI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Kimi K3 Moonshot AI
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Muse Wonder 1.0 Meta AI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Optimizing Clinical Documentation Pipelines with Code Generation
For healthcare administrators managing clinical documentation systems, the choice of an AI coding assistant is about balancing speed, accuracy, and rigorous audit trails. Grok Code Fast 1 has emerged as a high-performance option for IDE integrations, particularly for teams requiring rapid, low-latency feedback during the development of medical records management software.
When working within a healthcare IT environment, the stability of the code generation process is paramount. Grok Code Fast 1 excels in this regard, offering a streamlined experience for inline code suggestions. Its architecture is specifically tuned for agentic workflows, meaning it handles complex, multi-file refactoring and bug fixing in legacy clinical databases with fewer interventions. This responsiveness is vital when maintaining HIPAA-compliant systems where every minute of downtime or developer friction impacts clinical workflows.
The model’s ability to handle 10K-token context windows effectively allows it to ingest large swathes of documentation logic and medical terminology mapping, ensuring suggestions are contextually aware of the specific healthcare standards being used. Administrators should consider this model when the priority is maintaining a high-velocity development cycle for internal tools. Unlike generalist models, this specialized approach reduces the likelihood of hallucinations in code, which is essential when building modules that interface with sensitive patient data or electronic health record (EHR) APIs. By integrating a model that understands the intricacies of clinical software development, teams can significantly improve their build-out efficiency while maintaining the necessary compliance oversight.