Claude Opus 5 Pricing: 200K-Token Video Script Production

Complete Analysis: 205,000 tokens for Claude Opus 5
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete analysis of pricing, performance, and use cases for Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 model with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) Total Cost
205,000 Total Tokens
12 minutes, 11.35 seconds Processing Time
280 Effective Tokens/Sec

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Opus 5
AnthropicMax Context: 1,000,000 tokens
$5 / $25 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.125000 Input Cost
$0.031250 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
205,000Total Tokens
$0.000823Cost per 1K
1,214,815Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

12m 11s Processing Time
300 Tokens/Second
300ms Time to First Token
280 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.281250 (rounded ~ $0.28) Input: $0.250000
Output: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Optimized Cost $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) Input: $0.250000
Output: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.112500 (rounded ~ $0.11) 40.0% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 200,000 input tokens and 5,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.250000
  • Output Cost: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
  • Total Cost: $0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000823
  • Tokens per dollar: 1,214,815 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 300 tokens per second and 300ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 12 minutes, 11.35 seconds
  • Latency: 300 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 300 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 280 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Ideal for high-stakes recruitment marketing scripts where reasoning and tone consistency are paramount.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Opus 5
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 200,000
Output Tokens: 5,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Opus 5
🏆 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.008750 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value ↓ 94.8% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 93.3% cheaper
🥉 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↓ 93.3% cheaper
#4 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
$0.015625 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↓ 90.7% cheaper
#5 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.025313 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 85% cheaper
#6 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 84.4% cheaper
#7 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
$0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↓ 80% cheaper
#8 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.035000 (rounded ~ $0.04) ↓ 79.3% cheaper
#9 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.050625 ↓ 70% cheaper
#10 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↓ 68.9% cheaper
#11 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07) ↓ 60% cheaper
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$0.070000 ↓ 58.5% cheaper
#13 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↓ 48.1% cheaper
#14 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↓ 40% cheaper
#15 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) Same price
#16 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) Same price
#17 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17) Same price
#18 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 3.7% more
#19 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 3.7% more
#20 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 3.7% more
#21 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 3.7% more
#22 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 3.7% more
#23 Grok 4.3
xAI
$0.240000 ↑ 42.2% more
#24 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$0.240000 ↑ 42.2% more
#25 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$0.265000 (rounded ~ $0.27) ↑ 57% more
#26 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32) ↑ 88.9% more
#27 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32) ↑ 88.9% more
#28 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34) ↑ 100% more
#29 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34) ↑ 100% more
#30 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$0.662500 (rounded ~ $0.66) ↑ 292.6% more
#31 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$1.350000 ↑ 700% more
#32 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$1.350000 ↑ 700% more
🏆

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.008750 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 94.8%
🥈

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 93.3%
🥉

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.011375 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 93.3%
#4

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.015625 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 90.7%
#5

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.025313 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 85%
#6

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.026250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 84.4%
#7

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.033750 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 80%
#8

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.035000 (rounded ~ $0.04)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 79.3%
#9

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.050625
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 70%
#10

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 68.9%
#11

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.067500 (rounded ~ $0.07)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 60%
#12

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.070000
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 58.5%
#13

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.087500 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 48.1%
#14

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 40%
#15

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs Claude Opus 5: Same
#16

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs Claude Opus 5: Same
#17

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.168750 (rounded ~ $0.17)
vs Claude Opus 5: Same
#18

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 3.7%
#19

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 3.7%
#20

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 3.7%
#21

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 3.7%
#22

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.175000 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 3.7%
#23

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.240000
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 42.2%
#24

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.240000
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 42.2%
#25

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.265000 (rounded ~ $0.27)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 57%
#26

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 88.9%
#27

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.318750 (rounded ~ $0.32)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 88.9%
#28

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 100%
#29

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 100%
#30

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.662500 (rounded ~ $0.66)
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 292.6%
#31

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$1.350000
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 700%
#32

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$1.350000
vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 700%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For recruiters tasked with producing high-quality video content—whether it’s employer branding spots, candidate interview prep, or internal training modules—Claude Opus 5 offers a robust solution for long-form script development. Producing four high-quality, long-form scripts per week requires a model that can handle complex narrative structures, maintain consistent brand voice, and reason through the specific requirements of a hiring brand strategy.

Claude Opus 5 excels in these areas due to its refined reasoning capabilities, which allow it to take a raw job description or candidate profile and weave it into a compelling, structured script. Unlike smaller, faster models that might lose the thread over long inputs, Opus 5 manages context effectively, ensuring that the tone remains professional and aligned with corporate guidelines. For a recruiter, this means less time spent editing AI hallucinations and more time focusing on video production and candidate engagement.

The model’s ability to plan and iterate makes it particularly suitable for draft-heavy workloads where nuance matters. If your recruitment team produces assets that need to be both informative and persuasive, the higher level of reasoning provided by this model ensures the resulting output is ready for a production setting with minimal manual intervention. Choosing this model is an investment in content quality, reducing the friction often found when scaling video production for HR teams that need to maintain a polished, consistent external image without the overhead of massive creative departments.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.