What are cached tokens and how do they save money?

Cached tokens are repeated input tokens (like system prompts or conversation history) that providers charge at a discounted rate. Anthropic offers varying discounts for cached tokens (typically 50-80%). Your calculation saves money by applying caching to 50% of input tokens for optimized cost savings.

When should I use Batch API vs real-time API?

Use Batch API for non-realtime processing of large volumes where latency isn't critical (saves up to 40-60%). Use real-time API for interactive applications like chatbots. Batch processing is ideal for data analysis, content generation in bulk, and offline processing.

What should I consider when comparing different AI models?

When comparing AI models, focus on factors such as performance, accuracy, response speed, cost, scalability, and how well the model fits your specific use case. The right choice depends on your workload, budget, and the type of tasks you want the AI to handle. Using an AI cost and time calculator can help you make an informed, data-driven decision.

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: 100K-Token Context Window Comparison

Name: Gemini 3.6 Flash
Brand: Google
Price: 0.01 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5 (89 reviews)

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Complete Comparison: 100,000 input tokens × 2,000 output tokens

⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API

Comparison Criteria	Claude Opus 5 Anthropic	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens	100,000	100,000
Output Tokens	2,000	2,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost	$0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)Worst	$0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)Best
Output Cost	$0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)Worst	$0.001875Best
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR)	$0.000000	$0.000000
Service Fees	$0.000000	$0.000000
Total Cost	$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) Most Expensive	$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value
Processing Time	5 minutes, 46.98 seconds Slowest	5 minutes, 42.42 seconds Fastest
Tokens per Second	300Slowest	304Fastest
Time to First Token	300ms Worst	120ms Best
Cost per 1K tokens	$0.000797Worst	$0.000119Best
Tokens per Dollar	1,255,385Worst Value	8,369,231Best Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base)	$1.250000Worst	$0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Best
Output Cost / 1M (Base)	$6.250000Worst	$0.937500 (rounded ~ $0.94)Best
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.625000 (rounded ~ $0.63)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$3.125000 (rounded ~ $3.13)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.468750 (rounded ~ $0.47)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Video Support	✗ Not Supported	✓ Supported
Audio Support	✗ Not Supported	✓ Supported
Caching Support 50	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Batch API Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported

Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Provider

Model

Second Model

Provider

Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic 1000000

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.137500 (rounded ~ $0.14) Input: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
Output: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)

Optimized Cost $0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) Input: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
Output: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.056250 (rounded ~ $0.06) 40.9% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)
Output Cost: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Total Cost: $0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000797
Tokens per dollar: 1,255,385 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 300 tokens per second and 300ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 5 minutes, 46.98 seconds
Latency: 300 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 300 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 294 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Opus 5 for complex clinical reasoning and accuracy. Use Gemini 3.6 Flash for high-speedhigh-volume transcription parsing.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 5. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google 1048576

$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✓ Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✓ Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.020625 Input: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.001875

Optimized Cost $0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.001875
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.008438 (rounded ~ $0.01) 40.9% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output Cost: $0.001875
Total Cost: $0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000119
Tokens per dollar: 8,369,231 tokens
Context Window: 1048576 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 304 tokens per second and 120ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 5 minutes, 42.42 seconds
Latency: 120 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 304 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 298 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Use Claude Opus 5 for complex clinical reasoning and accuracy. Use Gemini 3.6 Flash for high-speedhigh-volume transcription parsing.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.6 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Opus 5

📋 Active Input Parameters

Input Tokens: 100,000

Output Tokens: 2,000

Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)

Cached Tokens: 50%

Tools: Enabled

Rank	AI Model & Provider	Total Cost	vs Claude Opus 5	vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
🏆	Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic	$0.003250 Best Value	↓ 96% cheaper	↓ 73.3% cheaper
🥈	GPT-6 Luna OpenAI	$0.003250	↓ 96% cheaper	↓ 73.3% cheaper
🥉	GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI	$0.003350	↓ 95.9% cheaper	↓ 72.5% cheaper
#4	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google	$0.004188	↓ 94.8% cheaper	↓ 65.6% cheaper
#5	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google	$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 93.4% cheaper	↓ 55.9% cheaper
#6	Gemini 2.5 Flash Google	$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 93.4% cheaper	↓ 55.9% cheaper
#7	Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI	$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 90.6% cheaper	↓ 37.4% cheaper
#8	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 85% cheaper	Same price
#9	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google	$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 85% cheaper	Same price
#10	GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI	$0.012563 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↓ 84.5% cheaper	↑ 3.1% more
#11	Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic	$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 80% cheaper	↑ 33.3% more
#12	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google	$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↓ 79.4% cheaper	↑ 37.4% more
#13	Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI	$0.020790	↓ 74.4% cheaper	↑ 70.6% more
#14	GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI	$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 61.8% cheaper	↑ 154.9% more
#15	GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI	$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 61.8% cheaper	↑ 154.9% more
#16	Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic	$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 61.5% cheaper	↑ 156.4% more
#17	Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic	$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 60% cheaper	↑ 166.7% more
#18	Gemini 4 Argon Google	$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 60% cheaper	↑ 166.7% more
#19	GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI	$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↓ 58.8% cheaper	↑ 174.9% more
#20	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↓ 45.4% cheaper	↑ 264.1% more
#21	Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05)	↓ 40% cheaper	↑ 300% more
#22	Grok 4.3 xAI	$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↓ 27.4% cheaper	↑ 384.1% more
#23	Grok 4.20 Beta xAI	$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↓ 27.4% cheaper	↑ 384.1% more
#24	Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic	$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↓ 23.1% cheaper	↑ 412.8% more
#25	GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI	$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↓ 20% cheaper	↑ 433.3% more
#26	GPT-6 Sol OpenAI	$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↓ 20% cheaper	↑ 433.3% more
#27	GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI	$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↓ 20% cheaper	↑ 433.3% more
#28	Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	$0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07)	↓ 17.5% cheaper	↑ 449.7% more
#29	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic	$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	Same price	↑ 566.7% more
#30	Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	Same price	↑ 566.7% more
#31	Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	Same price	↑ 566.7% more
#32	GPT-5.4 OpenAI	$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 3.1% more	↑ 587.2% more
#33	GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI	$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 3.1% more	↑ 587.2% more
#34	GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI	$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 3.1% more	↑ 587.2% more
#35	Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic	$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)	↑ 88.5% more	↑ 1156.4% more
#36	Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic	$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)	↑ 88.5% more	↑ 1156.4% more
#37	Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)	↑ 100% more	↑ 1233.3% more
#38	Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)	↑ 100% more	↑ 1233.3% more
#39	GPT-5.5 OpenAI	$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17)	↑ 106.2% more	↑ 1274.4% more
#40	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33)	↑ 300% more	↑ 2566.7% more
#41	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)	↑ 358.8% more	↑ 2958.5% more
#42	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)	↑ 358.8% more	↑ 2958.5% more

🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

$0.003250

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 96%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 73.3%

🥈

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.003250

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 96%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 73.3%

🥉

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.003350

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 95.9%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 72.5%

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.004188

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 94.8%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 65.6%

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 93.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 55.9%

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 93.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 55.9%

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 90.6%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↓ 37.4%

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 85%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Same

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 85%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Same

#10

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.012563 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 84.5%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 3.1%

#11

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 80%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 33.3%

#12

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 79.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 37.4%

#13

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

$0.020790

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 74.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 70.6%

#14

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 61.8%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 154.9%

#15

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 61.8%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 154.9%

#16

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic

$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 61.5%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 156.4%

#17

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 60%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 166.7%

#18

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 60%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 166.7%

#19

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 58.8%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 174.9%

#20

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 45.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 264.1%

#21

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 40%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 300%

#22

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 27.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 384.1%

#23

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 27.4%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 384.1%

#24

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 23.1%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 412.8%

#25

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 20%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 433.3%

#26

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 20%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 433.3%

#27

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 20%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 433.3%

#28

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↓ 17.5%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 449.7%

#29

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Opus 5: Same

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#30

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Opus 5: Same

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#31

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Opus 5: Same

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 566.7%

#32

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 3.1%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 587.2%

#33

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 3.1%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 587.2%

#34

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 3.1%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 587.2%

#35

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 88.5%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1156.4%

#36

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 88.5%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1156.4%

#37

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 100%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1233.3%

#38

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 100%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1233.3%

#39

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 106.2%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 1274.4%

#40

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 300%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 2566.7%

#41

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 358.8%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 2958.5%

#42

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37)

vs Claude Opus 5: ↑ 358.8%

vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: ↑ 2958.5%

✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Clinical Note Generation: Choosing the Right Engine

For financial analysts and healthcare administrators managing clinical note generation pipelines, the choice between Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash often comes down to balancing reasoning depth against high-throughput efficiency. Clinical notes are not just text; they are structured, sensitive, and require high-fidelity summarization of doctor-dictated transcripts. Ensuring that medical instructions, patient observations, and billing codes remain accurate is the primary hurdle.

Claude Opus 5 serves as a robust powerhouse for complex medical inference. When clinical workflows demand that an AI understand subtle nuance in physician jargon, cross-reference previous patient history, or manage long-form, multi-step reasoning, Opus 5 provides a higher baseline for structural adherence. It is particularly effective when the pipeline requires the model to act as a reasoning agent, validating logic and ensuring that the final output aligns with standard clinical documentation formats.

Gemini 3.6 Flash, conversely, excels in high-volume, cost-sensitive environments. If your clinical note pipeline handles tens of thousands of notes daily—where latency and rapid processing are more critical than the deepest possible reasoning—Gemini 3.6 Flash is likely the superior fit. Its architecture is optimized for speed, making it exceptionally reliable for standard transcription-to-note conversion tasks. While it remains highly capable, the trade-off is often seen in its approach to extremely complex, multi-layered reasoning tasks where Opus might offer more depth. For MVP-stage clinical tools, starting with Flash allows for rapid iteration and scaling before moving to more intensive reasoning models.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?

Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.

How does prompt caching work?

Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.

How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?

Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.

What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?

The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: 100K-Token Context Window Comparison

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Second Model

Select AI Model

Claude Opus 5

Calculate Token Costs

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

Model Comparison

Model Information

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google 1048576

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon Google

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

Grok 4.3 xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta xAI

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

Clinical Note Generation: Choosing the Right Engine

Frequently Asked Questions

Related model pricing

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

Gemini 4 Argon
Google

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

Grok 4.3
xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic

GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI