Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 8,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.006000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Output Cost: $0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.012150 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001215
- Tokens per dollar: 823,045 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 31.65 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.002400
Output: $0.002400
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 8,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.001600
- Output Cost: $0.002400
- Total Cost: $0.003640
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000364
- Tokens per dollar: 2,747,253 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 1,300 tokens per second and 70ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 8.41 seconds
- Latency: 70 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 1,300 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 1,215 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.6 Luna. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash | vs GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.001620 Best Value | ↓ 86.7% cheaper | ↓ 55.5% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.001620 | ↓ 86.7% cheaper | ↓ 55.5% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.003640 | ↓ 70% cheaper | Same price |
| #4 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.004240 | ↓ 65.1% cheaper | ↑ 16.5% more |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.004550 | ↓ 62.6% cheaper | ↑ 25% more |
| #6 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.006100 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 49.8% cheaper | ↑ 67.6% more |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.006860 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 43.5% cheaper | ↑ 88.5% more |
| #8 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.006860 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 43.5% cheaper | ↑ 88.5% more |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.009100 | ↓ 25.1% cheaper | ↑ 150% more |
| #10 |
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
|
$0.010200 | ↓ 16% cheaper | ↑ 180.2% more |
| #11 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.012150 (rounded ~ $0.01) | Same price | ↑ 233.8% more |
| #12 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.012750 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 4.9% more | ↑ 250.3% more |
| #13 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.012750 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 4.9% more | ↑ 250.3% more |
| #14 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.013650 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↑ 12.3% more | ↑ 275% more |
| #15 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.016200 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 33.3% more | ↑ 345.1% more |
| #16 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.016792 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 38.2% more | ↑ 361.3% more |
| #17 |
Grok 4.7
xAI
|
$0.024400 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 100.8% more | ↑ 570.3% more |
| #18 |
Grok 4.6
xAI
|
$0.024400 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 100.8% more | ↑ 570.3% more |
| #19 |
Grok 4.5
xAI
|
$0.024400 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 100.8% more | ↑ 570.3% more |
| #20 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.027750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 128.4% more | ↑ 662.4% more |
| #21 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.032200 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 165% more | ↑ 784.6% more |
| #22 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.032400 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 166.7% more | ↑ 790.1% more |
| #23 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.032400 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 166.7% more | ↑ 790.1% more |
| #24 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.032400 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 166.7% more | ↑ 790.1% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.032400 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 166.7% more | ↑ 790.1% more |
| #26 |
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
|
$0.032680 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 169% more | ↑ 797.8% more |
| #27 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.036400 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 199.6% more | ↑ 900% more |
| #28 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.036400 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 199.6% more | ↑ 900% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.038850 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 219.8% more | ↑ 967.3% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.038850 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 219.8% more | ↑ 967.3% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.045500 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 274.5% more | ↑ 1150% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.045500 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 274.5% more | ↑ 1150% more |
| #33 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.048600 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↑ 300% more | ↑ 1235.2% more |
| #34 |
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI
|
$0.049020 | ↑ 303.5% more | ↑ 1246.7% more |
| #35 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.064400 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 430% more | ↑ 1669.2% more |
| #36 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.064800 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 433.3% more | ↑ 1680.2% more |
| #37 |
Muse Wonder 1.0
Meta AI
|
$0.072000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 492.6% more | ↑ 1878% more |
| #38 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.081000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↑ 2125.3% more |
| #39 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.081000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↑ 2125.3% more |
| #40 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.081000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↑ 2125.3% more |
| #41 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.081000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 566.7% more | ↑ 2125.3% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.091000 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 649% more | ↑ 2400% more |
| #43 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.091000 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 649% more | ↑ 2400% more |
| #44 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.160500 | ↑ 1221% more | ↑ 4309.3% more |
| #45 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.160500 | ↑ 1221% more | ↑ 4309.3% more |
| #46 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.162000 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 1233.3% more | ↑ 4350.5% more |
| #47 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.162000 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 1233.3% more | ↑ 4350.5% more |
| #48 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.162000 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 1233.3% more | ↑ 4350.5% more |
| #49 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.466200 (rounded ~ $0.47) | ↑ 3737% more | ↑ 12707.7% more |
| #50 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.466200 (rounded ~ $0.47) | ↑ 3737% more | ↑ 12707.7% more |
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Grok Build 0.1 xAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Grok 4.7 xAI
Grok 4.6 xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
Kimi K3.1 Pro Moonshot AI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Kimi K3 Moonshot AI
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Muse Wonder 1.0 Meta AI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Choosing Between Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna
For mid-market ecommerce brands processing a high volume of customer support tickets, selecting the right model often comes down to balancing throughput with reasoning quality. Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna represent two distinct approaches to this challenge, each offering unique strengths for multi-turn conversational agents.
Gemini 3.8 Flash is designed with a focus on multimodal integration and speed. If your support workflow involves not just text, but analyzing customer-provided images of damaged goods or audio clips from support calls, this model provides a highly efficient path. Its architecture is optimized for rapid responses, making it an excellent candidate for real-time deflection where latency directly impacts user experience. The model’s breadth of capability allows for a versatile agent that can handle diverse input types seamlessly.
Conversely, GPT-5.6 Luna offers a highly reliable performance profile for standard text-based support interactions. It is favored for its stability and predictable output, which can be easier to integrate into existing CRM systems that rely on strict formatting. For teams prioritizing a standardized, high-volume text pipeline, Luna provides a dependable baseline that minimizes the need for iterative prompting to achieve consistent results.
Ultimately, the decision depends on whether your support backlog is primarily text-based or if you are integrating rich media triage. Both models are capable of handling your 8K-input volume effectively, but their deployment should align with the specific nature of your customer queries.