Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000750
Output: $0.000750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 800 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
- Output Cost: $0.000750
- Total Cost: $0.077625 (rounded ~ $0.08)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000155
- Tokens per dollar: 6,451,530 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 26 minutes, 16.23 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 318 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.020740 Best Value | ↓ 73.3% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.025925 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 66.6% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
|
$0.030914 | ↓ 60.2% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 59.7% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 59.7% cheaper |
| #6 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.041300 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 46.8% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.077625 (rounded ~ $0.08) | Same price |
| #8 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.103500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #9 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.140236 | ↑ 80.7% more |
| #10 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.204500 (rounded ~ $0.20) | ↑ 163.4% more |
| #11 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.207000 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.207000 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.207400 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 167.2% more |
| #14 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.207400 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 167.2% more |
| #15 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.310500 | ↑ 300% more |
| #16 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.409000 | ↑ 426.9% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.414000 (rounded ~ $0.41) | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #18 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.517500 (rounded ~ $0.52) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #19 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.517500 (rounded ~ $0.52) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #20 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.517500 (rounded ~ $0.52) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #21 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.517500 (rounded ~ $0.52) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.518500 (rounded ~ $0.52) | ↑ 568% more |
| #23 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.823200 (rounded ~ $0.82) | ↑ 960.5% more |
| #24 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.823200 (rounded ~ $0.82) | ↑ 960.5% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.826000 (rounded ~ $0.83) | ↑ 964.1% more |
| #26 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.826000 (rounded ~ $0.83) | ↑ 964.1% more |
| #27 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.827200 (rounded ~ $0.83) | ↑ 965.6% more |
| #28 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$1.016250 (rounded ~ $1.02) | ↑ 1209.2% more |
| #29 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$1.016250 (rounded ~ $1.02) | ↑ 1209.2% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$1.034000 (rounded ~ $1.03) | ↑ 1232% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$1.034000 (rounded ~ $1.03) | ↑ 1232% more |
| #32 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$1.035000 (rounded ~ $1.04) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #33 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$1.035000 (rounded ~ $1.04) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$2.068000 (rounded ~ $2.07) | ↑ 2564.1% more |
| #35 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$4.140000 | ↑ 5233.3% more |
| #36 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$4.140000 | ↑ 5233.3% more |
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
For mobile app developers focused on rapid, high-volume e-commerce applications, Gemini 3.8 Flash serves as a primary contender for content generation pipelines. When building features that require the automated drafting of hundreds or thousands of product descriptions, latency and consistent performance across diverse input categories are critical. Gemini 3.8 Flash is engineered to handle these high-throughput requirements, making it an excellent choice for scenarios where you need to balance speed with the ability to reason through complex product features and benefits.
One of the key strengths for app developers is the model’s native multimodal capability. If your product generation pipeline includes analyzing product images alongside technical specs, this model provides a streamlined workflow by avoiding the need for separate vision and text models. This simplifies your architecture and reduces potential points of failure. While larger frontier models exist, Flash-tier models are often more than sufficient for standard product descriptions, which typically follow a predictable structure.
For an MVP or a scaling indie project, the ability to iterate quickly without heavy infrastructure overhead is essential. Gemini 3.8 Flash allows you to maintain high response rates, ensuring that your app feels snappy for end-users even when processing batches of descriptions. When comparing for your specific use case, consider how frequently your app triggers these generation tasks. If your workload involves continuous, real-time generation, the efficiency of the Flash architecture can significantly streamline your development process while keeping performance stable during traffic spikes.