Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.008000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.008000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.095000 (rounded ~ $0.10)
- Output Cost: $0.008000 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.063575 (rounded ~ $0.06)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000623
- Tokens per dollar: 1,604,404 tokens
- Context Window: 262144 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 185 tokens per second and 235ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 9 minutes, 22.56 seconds
- Latency: 235 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 185 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 181 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Kimi K2.7 Code. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Kimi K2.7 Code| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.003250 Best Value | ↓ 94.9% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.003250 | ↓ 94.9% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.003350 | ↓ 94.7% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.004188 | ↓ 93.4% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 91.5% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.005375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 91.5% cheaper |
| #7 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 88% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 80.8% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.012188 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 80.8% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.012563 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 80.2% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 74.4% cheaper |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.016750 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 73.7% cheaper |
| #13 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.020790 | ↓ 67.3% cheaper |
| #14 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 51.1% cheaper |
| #15 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.031063 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 51.1% cheaper |
| #16 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 50.8% cheaper |
| #17 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 48.9% cheaper |
| #18 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.032500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 48.9% cheaper |
| #19 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.033500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 47.3% cheaper |
| #20 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.044375 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 30.2% cheaper |
| #21 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.048750 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 23.3% cheaper |
| #22 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 7.2% cheaper |
| #23 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.059000 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 7.2% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 1.7% cheaper |
| #25 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 2.2% more |
| #26 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 2.2% more |
| #27 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.065000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 2.2% more |
| #28 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.067000 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 5.4% more |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 27.8% more |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 27.8% more |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 27.8% more |
| #32 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.081250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 27.8% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 31.7% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 31.7% more |
| #35 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.083750 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 31.7% more |
| #36 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 140.9% more |
| #37 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.153125 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↑ 140.9% more |
| #38 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 155.6% more |
| #39 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.162500 (rounded ~ $0.16) | ↑ 155.6% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.167500 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 163.5% more |
| #41 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.325000 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↑ 411.2% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37) | ↑ 486.3% more |
| #43 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.372750 (rounded ~ $0.37) | ↑ 486.3% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
For large-scale enterprise engineering teams, managing pull request reviews across hundreds of thousands of lines of code is a significant bottleneck. Kimi K2.7 Code is designed specifically for these high-throughput, agentic coding environments. Unlike general-purpose models, it excels at navigating complex repository structures, identifying architectural regressions, and adhering to strict internal coding standards across massive diffs.
For publishers and platform leads overseeing CI/CD pipelines at an enterprise scale—where 100M tokens per month is a typical workload—choosing a model that balances reasoning depth with cost-efficiency is critical. Kimi K2.7 Code offers a specialized approach to code-heavy tasks, effectively acting as a first-line reviewer that filters noise and highlights high-risk changes before they reach a human engineer.
What makes this model particularly valuable for enterprise architects is its integration into agentic workflows. By offloading initial code reviews to a model optimized for long-context comprehension, teams can significantly reduce human reviewer fatigue and shorten the development cycle. Furthermore, its ability to utilize tools makes it a versatile component in automated testing suites.
In a high-volume production setup, the key is consistency. Kimi K2.7 Code’s instruction-following capabilities across long-horizon coding tasks ensure that the feedback remains actionable and aligned with the codebase’s history. When evaluating your AI coding infrastructure, consider this model for workflows that demand reliability and deep contextual understanding without the overhead of the largest flagship models.