Gemini 3.8 Flash Google 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.000938
Output: $0.000938
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 500,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
- Output Cost: $0.000938
- Total Cost: $0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000105
- Tokens per dollar: 9,542,857 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 340 tokens per second and 105ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 25 minutes, 47.39 seconds
- Latency: 105 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 340 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 324 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.8 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Gemini 3.8 Flash| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.014050 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 73.2% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.017563 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 66.5% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 59.5% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.021250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 59.5% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.027875 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 46.9% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.052500 (rounded ~ $0.05) | Same price |
| #7 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.070000 | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.094545 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↑ 80.1% more |
| #9 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.133750 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↑ 154.8% more |
| #10 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.140000 | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #11 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.140000 | ↑ 166.7% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.140500 | ↑ 167.6% more |
| #13 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.140500 | ↑ 167.6% more |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.210000 | ↑ 300% more |
| #15 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.267500 (rounded ~ $0.27) | ↑ 409.5% more |
| #16 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.280000 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #17 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.350000 | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #18 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.350000 | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #19 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.350000 | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #20 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.350000 | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #21 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.351250 (rounded ~ $0.35) | ↑ 569% more |
| #22 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.554000 (rounded ~ $0.55) | ↑ 955.2% more |
| #23 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.554000 (rounded ~ $0.55) | ↑ 955.2% more |
| #24 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.557500 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 961.9% more |
| #25 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.557500 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 961.9% more |
| #26 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.559000 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 964.8% more |
| #27 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.653125 (rounded ~ $0.65) | ↑ 1144% more |
| #28 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.653125 (rounded ~ $0.65) | ↑ 1144% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.698750 (rounded ~ $0.70) | ↑ 1231% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.698750 (rounded ~ $0.70) | ↑ 1231% more |
| #31 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.700000 | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #32 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.700000 | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$1.397500 (rounded ~ $1.40) | ↑ 2561.9% more |
| #34 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$2.800000 | ↑ 5233.3% more |
| #35 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$2.800000 | ↑ 5233.3% more |
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
In the legal and compliance sector, the ability to rapidly ingest and summarize massive volumes of documentation is a critical operational advantage. Gemini 3.8 Flash has emerged as a specialized powerhouse for these high-throughput, document-heavy workflows. Its architecture is optimized for speed and sustained reasoning across long-horizon tasks, making it particularly effective for parsing complex regulatory PDFs, contract clauses, and discovery sets where processing latency can directly impact turnaround times.
For UX researchers and legal teams alike, the challenge is often balancing the depth of analysis required with the sheer volume of documents to be reviewed. Gemini 3.8 Flash addresses this by maintaining a strong performance bar on document-based reasoning while operating at a speed that supports real-time, iterative workflows. Unlike models that might struggle with the context length or compute overhead of 500K-token inputs, this model is designed to handle such large-scale ingestion with agility. It allows for the extraction of specific compliance insights, policy deviations, or risk indicators from vast archives, enabling teams to scale their research operations without the bottlenecks associated with slower, more resource-intensive systems. Its effectiveness in structured, multi-step environments makes it a reliable default for teams needing to turn complex, high-volume document sets into actionable intelligence efficiently. When your research or compliance pipeline depends on consistent, fast, and high-accuracy summarization across large document batches, this model provides the necessary performance edge.