GPT-6 Sol OpenAI 1050000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.002500
Output: $0.002500
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.050000
- Output Cost: $0.002500
- Total Cost: $0.030000
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000594
- Tokens per dollar: 1,683,333 tokens
- Context Window: 1050000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 131 tokens per second and 340ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 6 minutes, 52.66 seconds
- Latency: 340 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 131 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 122 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-6 Sol. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-6 Sol| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.001500 Best Value | ↓ 95% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.001500 | ↓ 95% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.001525 | ↓ 94.9% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.001906 | ↓ 93.6% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.002375 | ↓ 92.1% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.002375 | ↓ 92.1% cheaper |
| #7 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.003625 | ↓ 87.9% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 81.3% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 81.3% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.005719 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 80.9% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.007500 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.007625 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 74.6% cheaper |
| #13 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.009873 | ↓ 67.1% cheaper |
| #14 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.013781 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 54.1% cheaper |
| #15 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.013781 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 54.1% cheaper |
| #16 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.014375 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 52.1% cheaper |
| #17 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #18 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 50% cheaper |
| #19 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 49.2% cheaper |
| #20 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.019688 | ↓ 34.4% cheaper |
| #21 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 25% cheaper |
| #22 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.028500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 5% cheaper |
| #23 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.028500 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 5% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.028750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 4.2% cheaper |
| #25 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.030000 | Same price |
| #26 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.030000 | Same price |
| #27 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.030500 | ↑ 1.7% more |
| #28 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 25% more |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 25% more |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 25% more |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.037500 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 25% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 27.1% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 27.1% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 27.1% more |
| #35 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.070313 | ↑ 134.4% more |
| #36 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.070313 | ↑ 134.4% more |
| #37 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 150% more |
| #38 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 150% more |
| #39 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 154.2% more |
| #40 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.150000 | ↑ 400% more |
| #41 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.165375 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 451.3% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.165375 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↑ 451.3% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Agentic browser automation requires a delicate balance between reasoning capability and operational cost, especially when scaling to 100 million tokens monthly within telecoms and utility infrastructure. Managing automated tasks like outage reporting, customer billing reconciliation, and field service dispatch involves consistent, multi-step tool execution that demands high model reliability.
GPT-6 Sol is particularly suited for these high-volume agentic workloads. Its advanced reasoning architecture allows it to handle complex, branching logic inherent in browser-based tasks without losing context across 50,000-token sessions. For enterprise architects designing these systems, the ability to rely on a model that maintains high performance while executing 20 to 50 tool calls per session is critical for operational stability.
In the telecoms sector, where data volume from network logs and customer interactions is immense, efficiency is paramount. Using automated pipelines that leverage batch processing helps maintain throughput without sacrificing the nuance required for sensitive compliance or incident reporting. While smaller, lighter models might suffice for simple Q&A, the demands of autonomous browser interaction—where the model must interpret dynamic layouts, interact with complex elements, and perform iterative error correction—necessitate a model with robust reasoning depth.
When planning your architecture, consider how your agentic orchestration layer handles state. A model that can consistently follow instructions through deep tool-use chains reduces the need for frequent retries, optimizing the overall token expenditure per task. By aligning your agentic strategies with high-reasoning models, you ensure that even at a 100-million-token scale, your automation remains precise, scalable, and operationally sound across your entire infrastructure.