Kimi K3.1 Pro Moonshot AI 1048576
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.150000
Output: $0.150000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 15,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.100000
- Output Cost: $0.150000
- Total Cost: $0.208500 (rounded ~ $0.21)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.003208
- Tokens per dollar: 311,751 tokens
- Context Window: 1048576 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 90 tokens per second and 350ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 12 minutes, 52.96 seconds
- Latency: 350 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 90 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 84 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Kimi K3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Kimi K3.1 Pro| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.005125 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 97.5% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.005125 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 97.5% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.005875 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 97.2% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.007344 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 96.5% cheaper |
| #5 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.009063 | ↓ 95.7% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 94.5% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 94.5% cheaper |
| #8 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.019219 | ↓ 90.8% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.019219 | ↓ 90.8% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.022031 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 89.4% cheaper |
| #11 |
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
|
$0.025025 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 88% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.025625 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 87.7% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.029375 | ↓ 85.9% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.050625 | ↓ 75.7% cheaper |
| #15 |
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
|
$0.051250 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 75.4% cheaper |
| #16 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.051250 (rounded ~ $0.05) | ↓ 75.4% cheaper |
| #17 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 72.4% cheaper |
| #18 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.057500 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 72.4% cheaper |
| #19 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.058750 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 71.8% cheaper |
| #20 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.064531 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 69% cheaper |
| #21 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.064531 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↓ 69% cheaper |
| #22 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.076875 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 63.1% cheaper |
| #23 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.092188 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 55.8% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
|
$0.101250 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 51.4% cheaper |
| #25 |
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 50.8% cheaper |
| #26 |
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 50.8% cheaper |
| #27 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.102500 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 50.8% cheaper |
| #28 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.117500 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↓ 43.6% cheaper |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 38.5% cheaper |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 38.5% cheaper |
| #31 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 38.5% cheaper |
| #32 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.128125 (rounded ~ $0.13) | ↓ 38.5% cheaper |
| #33 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.146875 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 29.6% cheaper |
| #34 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.146875 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 29.6% cheaper |
| #35 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.146875 (rounded ~ $0.15) | ↓ 29.6% cheaper |
| #36 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.251563 (rounded ~ $0.25) | ↑ 20.7% more |
| #37 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.251563 (rounded ~ $0.25) | ↑ 20.7% more |
| #38 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.256250 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↑ 22.9% more |
| #39 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.256250 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↑ 22.9% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.293750 (rounded ~ $0.29) | ↑ 40.9% more |
| #41 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.512500 (rounded ~ $0.51) | ↑ 145.8% more |
| #42 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.774375 (rounded ~ $0.77) | ↑ 271.4% more |
| #43 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.774375 (rounded ~ $0.77) | ↑ 271.4% more |
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Optimizing Scientific Research Workflows
Scientific research demands a rare combination of reasoning depth, citation accuracy, and structural precision. For analysts and research teams building automated drafting tools, Kimi K3.1 Pro offers a compelling balance of agentic capabilities and context management. When processing extensive literature reviews, the model’s ability to maintain coherence across lengthy input sequences ensures that synthesized insights remain grounded in the source material rather than drifting into generic summaries.
Unlike general-purpose models, Kimi K3.1 Pro is optimized for tasks where precision in citation and structural logic is paramount. In research paper drafting, where you are balancing 50,000 tokens of source material against a 15,000-token draft, the model’s thinking capabilities allow it to perform multi-step synthesis before outputting the final text. This capability reduces the need for the iterative, prompt-heavy workflows that are often a bottleneck in academic automation.
From an engineering perspective, the integration of native tools and advanced reasoning allows this model to perform web-based fact-checking, which is vital for maintaining the integrity of research outputs. While many models struggle with the nuance of formal academic tone, this model demonstrates strong adherence to rigorous stylistic constraints. For teams managing high-volume research pipelines, the model’s reliability in handling large, dense documents makes it a strong candidate for applications looking to scale content production without sacrificing the depth required for high-quality peer review. Data analysts should prioritize this model when the research workload requires a blend of reasoning and long-context comprehension, particularly in environments where hallucination mitigation is the primary KPI.