GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.002250
Output: $0.002250
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Output Cost: $0.002250
- Total Cost: $0.016781 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000165
- Tokens per dollar: 6,078,212 tokens
- Context Window: 400000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 3 minutes, 38.46 seconds
- Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 467 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to GPT-5.4 mini| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.002088 Best Value | ↓ 87.6% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.002088 | ↓ 87.6% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.005594 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 66.7% cheaper |
| #4 |
Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
|
$0.006223 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 62.9% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.007063 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 57.9% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.007063 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 57.9% cheaper |
| #7 |
Devstral 2
Mistral AI
|
$0.008200 (rounded ~ $0.01) | ↓ 51.1% cheaper |
| #8 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.010438 | ↓ 37.8% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.016406 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↓ 2.2% cheaper |
| #10 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.021375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 27.4% more |
| #11 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.021875 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 30.4% more |
| #12 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.022375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #13 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.022375 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 33.3% more |
| #14 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.023513 (rounded ~ $0.02) | ↑ 40.1% more |
| #15 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.032813 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 95.5% more |
| #16 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.033563 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↑ 100% more |
| #17 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.040906 | ↑ 143.8% more |
| #18 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.040906 | ↑ 143.8% more |
| #19 |
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
|
$0.041250 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 145.8% more |
| #20 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.043750 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↑ 160.7% more |
| #21 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.055938 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 233.3% more |
| #22 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.058438 (rounded ~ $0.06) | ↑ 248.2% more |
| #23 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.065625 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↑ 291.1% more |
| #24 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.081500 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 385.7% more |
| #25 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.081500 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↑ 385.7% more |
| #26 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.089500 | ↑ 433.3% more |
| #27 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.109375 | ↑ 551.8% more |
| #28 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.109375 | ↑ 551.8% more |
| #29 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.109375 | ↑ 551.8% more |
| #30 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.109375 | ↑ 551.8% more |
| #31 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.111875 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #32 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.111875 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #33 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.111875 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #34 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.111875 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↑ 566.7% more |
| #35 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.213750 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 1173.7% more |
| #36 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.214063 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 1175.6% more |
| #37 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$0.214063 (rounded ~ $0.21) | ↑ 1175.6% more |
| #38 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$0.218750 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↑ 1203.5% more |
| #39 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$0.218750 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↑ 1203.5% more |
| #40 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.223750 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↑ 1233.3% more |
| #41 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.427500 (rounded ~ $0.43) | ↑ 2447.5% more |
| #42 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$0.437500 (rounded ~ $0.44) | ↑ 2507.1% more |
| #43 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.490875 | ↑ 2825.1% more |
| #44 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$0.490875 | ↑ 2825.1% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Devstral Small 2 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Devstral 2 Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Magistral Medium Mistral AI
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Scaling Personalized Newsletters
For a 20-person startup, the challenge of sending 10,000+ personalized newsletters isn’t just about content—it is about architectural efficiency. When processing hundreds of thousands of tokens per run, opting for an optimized model like GPT-5.4 mini ensures you can maintain high throughput without hitting the cost ceilings associated with frontier models.
GPT-5.4 mini is engineered for high-frequency tasks where latency and cost-per-token are critical constraints. For newsletter personalization, where the prompt structure is often consistent (e.g., injecting user-specific interests into a standardized template), this model provides the ideal balance of reasoning capability and operational speed. It effectively handles structured data extraction and personalized copy generation without the overhead of larger, more reasoning-intensive models that are better suited for complex, multi-step analysis.
Architecting your pipeline for this scale requires more than just API calls. By batching your personalization requests, you can maximize throughput while keeping latency low. Implementing a semantic cache in front of your newsletter generation pipeline is a recommended practice to avoid re-processing identical user segments or repeated content chunks. This approach ensures that your startup can scale to 100 million tokens monthly while maintaining a lean infrastructure, keeping focus on core product innovation rather than managing bloated AI spend. This model serves as the backbone for high-volume text automation where consistency and speed drive engagement.