o3 Deep Research OpenAI
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.600000
Output: $0.600000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 50,000 input tokens and 15,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $0.500000
- Output Cost: $0.600000
- Total Cost: $1.010000
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.015538 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Tokens per dollar: 64,356 tokens
- Context Window: 200000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 80 tokens per second and 450ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 14 minutes, 29.56 seconds
- Latency: 450 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 80 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 75 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for o3 Deep Research. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to o3 Deep Research| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs o3 Deep Research |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.008600 (rounded ~ $0.01) Best Value | ↓ 99.1% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
|
$0.030700 | ↓ 97% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.032750 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 96.8% cheaper |
| #4 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.043000 (rounded ~ $0.04) | ↓ 95.7% cheaper |
| #5 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.049800 | ↓ 95.1% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.065500 (rounded ~ $0.07) | ↓ 93.5% cheaper |
| #7 |
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
|
$0.070020 | ↓ 93.1% cheaper |
| #8 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.088750 (rounded ~ $0.09) | ↓ 91.2% cheaper |
| #9 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$0.098250 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 90.3% cheaper |
| #10 |
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
|
$0.099615 | ↓ 90.1% cheaper |
| #11 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$0.101000 (rounded ~ $0.10) | ↓ 90% cheaper |
| #12 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$0.111100 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↓ 89% cheaper |
| #13 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$0.116000 (rounded ~ $0.12) | ↓ 88.5% cheaper |
| #14 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.172000 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↓ 83% cheaper |
| #15 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.196500 (rounded ~ $0.20) | ↓ 80.5% cheaper |
| #16 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.201250 (rounded ~ $0.20) | ↓ 80.1% cheaper |
| #17 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.262000 (rounded ~ $0.26) | ↓ 74.1% cheaper |
| #18 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$0.281750 (rounded ~ $0.28) | ↓ 72.1% cheaper |
| #19 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.281750 (rounded ~ $0.28) | ↓ 72.1% cheaper |
| #20 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$0.327500 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↓ 67.6% cheaper |
| #21 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$0.327500 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↓ 67.6% cheaper |
| #22 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.348000 (rounded ~ $0.35) | ↓ 65.5% cheaper |
| #23 |
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
|
$0.580000 | ↓ 42.6% cheaper |
| #24 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.580000 | ↓ 42.6% cheaper |
| #25 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.580000 | ↓ 42.6% cheaper |
| #26 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$0.655000 (rounded ~ $0.66) | ↓ 35.1% cheaper |
| #27 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$0.655000 (rounded ~ $0.66) | ↓ 35.1% cheaper |
| #28 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$2.020000 | ↑ 100% more |
| #29 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$3.381000 (rounded ~ $3.38) | ↑ 234.8% more |
| #30 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$3.381000 (rounded ~ $3.38) | ↑ 234.8% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Grok Code Fast 1 xAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI
Grok 4.3 xAI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
o4-mini OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Optimizing Academic Drafting with Agentic Research
For independent researchers and academics, the literature review process is often the most time-consuming stage of paper drafting. When you need to synthesize 50,000 tokens of existing research—spanning multiple PDFs, study reports, and raw data—the challenge lies not just in summarization, but in maintaining factual integrity throughout the draft.
o3 Deep Research is purpose-built for this agentic workflow. Unlike standard language models that rely solely on training data, this model is designed to actively browse and ingest external sources, creating a rigorous chain-of-thought that mirrors the iterative process of a human researcher. It excels at multi-step investigations where you must parse conflicting findings across different scholarly articles.
When to choose o3 Deep Research:
- High-Stakes Synthesis: Use this model when your literature review requires precision. It autonomously plans research strategies, finds missing links between papers, and ensures that every claim made in your draft is backed by a traceable citation.
- Deep Technical Analysis: When your research includes dense data tables, chart analysis, or Python-based quantitative validation, the model’s ability to execute code and perform multimodal inspection makes it a robust partner.
By shifting from passive prompting to an agentic approach, you can move from a pile of scattered 50K-token inputs to a structured, synthesized first draft without the hallucinations often found in smaller or general-purpose models.