Budget Legal Contract Analysis: Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for 50K Tokens

Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Complete Comparison: 50,000 input tokens × 2,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria Claude Haiku 4.6
Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens 50,000 50,000
Output Tokens 2,000 2,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.003125 $0.003125
Output Cost $0.000625Best $0.000750Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.002344 Best Value $0.002469 Most Expensive
Processing Time 1 minute, 5.64 seconds Slowest 55.82 seconds Fastest
Tokens per Second 850Slowest 1,000Fastest
Time to First Token 75ms Best 80ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000045Best $0.000047Worst
Tokens per Dollar 22,186,667Best Value 21,063,291Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06) $0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $0.312500 (rounded ~ $0.31)Best $0.375000 (rounded ~ $0.38)Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.156250 (rounded ~ $0.16)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Video Support ✗ Not Supported ✓ Supported
Audio Support ✗ Not Supported ✓ Supported
OCR Support ✗ Not Supported ✓ Supported
Caching Support
50
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

Select AI Model

Claude Haiku 4.6
AnthropicMax Context: 200,000 tokens
$0.25 / $1.25 per 1M tokens
▼
▼
Use Batch API (50% discount)
50%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.002344 Total Cost
$0.001563 Input Cost
$0.000625 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
52,000Total Tokens
$0.000045Cost per 1K
22,186,667Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

1m 5s Processing Time
850 Tokens/Second
75ms Time to First Token
794 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after
🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)
🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier
📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited
🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic

$0.002344
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.003750 Input: $0.003125
Output: $0.000625
Optimized Cost $0.002344 Input: $0.003125
Output: $0.000625
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.001406 37.5% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 50,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.003125
  • Output Cost: $0.000625
  • Total Cost: $0.002344
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000045
  • Tokens per dollar: 22,186,667 tokens
  • Context Window: 200000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 75ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 1 minute, 5.64 seconds
  • Latency: 75 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 794 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Excellent for cost-sensitive legal tech applicationscomparing rapidaffordable processing with broader multimodal potential and larger context windows for detailed document analysis.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Haiku 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google 1000000

$0.002469
Total Cost
⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✓ Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✓ Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✓ Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
⚡
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.003875 Input: $0.003125
Output: $0.000750
Optimized Cost $0.002469 Input: $0.003125
Output: $0.000750
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.001406 36.3% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 50,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.003125
  • Output Cost: $0.000750
  • Total Cost: $0.002469
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000047
  • Tokens per dollar: 21,063,291 tokens
  • Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 1,000 tokens per second and 80ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 55.82 seconds
  • Latency: 80 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 1,000 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 935 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Excellent for cost-sensitive legal tech applicationscomparing rapidaffordable processing with broader multimodal potential and larger context windows for detailed document analysis.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Haiku 4.6
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 50,000
Output Tokens: 2,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 50%
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
🏆 Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
 $0.000838 Best Value ↓ 64.3% cheaper ↓ 66.1% cheaper
🥈 Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI
 $0.000838 ↓ 64.3% cheaper ↓ 66.1% cheaper
🥉 Ministral 3 (14B)
Mistral AI
 $0.001475 ↓ 37.1% cheaper ↓ 40.3% cheaper
#4 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
 $0.002469 ↑ 5.3% more Same price
#5 Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA
 $0.002473 ↑ 5.5% more ↑ 0.2% more
#6 Devstral 2
Mistral AI
 $0.003200 ↑ 36.5% more ↑ 29.6% more
#7 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
 $0.003313 ↑ 41.3% more ↑ 34.2% more
#8 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
 $0.003313 ↑ 41.3% more ↑ 34.2% more
#9 Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
 $0.004188 ↑ 78.7% more ↑ 69.6% more
#10 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
 $0.007031 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 200% more ↑ 184.8% more
#11 GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
 $0.007406 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 216% more ↑ 200% more
#12 o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.008875 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 278.7% more ↑ 259.5% more
#13 Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
 $0.009375 ↑ 300% more ↑ 279.7% more
#14 o4-mini
OpenAI
 $0.009763 ↑ 316.5% more ↑ 295.4% more
#15 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
 $0.009875 ↑ 321.3% more ↑ 300% more
#16 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
 $0.009875 ↑ 321.3% more ↑ 300% more
#17 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
 $0.014063 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 500% more ↑ 469.6% more
#18 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
 $0.014813 (rounded ~ $0.01) ↑ 532% more ↑ 500% more
#19 Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
 $0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 593.3% more ↑ 558.2% more
#20 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
 $0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 700% more ↑ 659.5% more
#21 GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
 $0.019031 ↑ 712% more ↑ 670.9% more
#22 GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.019031 ↑ 712% more ↑ 670.9% more
#23 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
 $0.024688 (rounded ~ $0.02) ↑ 953.3% more ↑ 900% more
#24 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
 $0.027188 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 1060% more ↑ 1001.3% more
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.028125 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 1100% more ↑ 1039.2% more
#26 Grok 4.3
xAI
 $0.031500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 1244% more ↑ 1175.9% more
#27 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
 $0.031500 (rounded ~ $0.03) ↑ 1244% more ↑ 1175.9% more
#28 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
 $0.039500 ↑ 1585.3% more ↑ 1500% more
#29 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
 $0.046875 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 1798.7% more
#30 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
 $0.046875 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 1798.7% more
#31 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
 $0.046875 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 1798.7% more
#32 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
 $0.046875 (rounded ~ $0.05) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 1798.7% more
#33 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
 $0.049375 ↑ 2006.7% more ↑ 1900% more
#34 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
 $0.049375 ↑ 2006.7% more ↑ 1900% more
#35 GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
 $0.049375 ↑ 2006.7% more ↑ 1900% more
#36 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
 $0.049375 ↑ 2006.7% more ↑ 1900% more
#37 o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
 $0.088750 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 3686.7% more ↑ 3494.9% more
#38 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.089063 ↑ 3700% more ↑ 3507.6% more
#39 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
 $0.089063 ↑ 3700% more ↑ 3507.6% more
#40 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
 $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 3900% more ↑ 3697.5% more
#41 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
 $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09) ↑ 3900% more ↑ 3697.5% more
#42 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
 $0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10) ↑ 4113.3% more ↑ 3900% more
#43 o3 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.177500 (rounded ~ $0.18) ↑ 7473.3% more ↑ 7089.9% more
#44 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
 $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19) ↑ 7900% more ↑ 7494.9% more
#45 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.228375 (rounded ~ $0.23) ↑ 9644% more ↑ 9150.6% more
#46 GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
 $0.228375 (rounded ~ $0.23) ↑ 9644% more ↑ 9150.6% more
🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.000838
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↓ 64.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↓ 66.1%
🥈

Devstral Small 2
Mistral AI

$0.000838
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↓ 64.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↓ 66.1%
🥉

Ministral 3 (14B)
Mistral AI

$0.001475
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↓ 37.1%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↓ 40.3%
#4

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.002469
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 5.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Same
#5

Nemotron 3 Super
NVIDIA

$0.002473
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 5.5%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 0.2%
#6

Devstral 2
Mistral AI

$0.003200
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 36.5%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 29.6%
#7

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.003313
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 41.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 34.2%
#8

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.003313
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 41.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 34.2%
#9

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.004188
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 78.7%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 69.6%
#10

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.007031 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 200%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 184.8%
#11

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.007406 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 216%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 200%
#12

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.008875 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 278.7%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 259.5%
#13

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.009375
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 300%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 279.7%
#14

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.009763
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 316.5%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 295.4%
#15

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.009875
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 321.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 300%
#16

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.009875
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 321.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 300%
#17

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.014063 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 500%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 469.6%
#18

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.014813 (rounded ~ $0.01)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 532%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 500%
#19

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI

$0.016250 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 593.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 558.2%
#20

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.018750 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 700%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 659.5%
#21

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.019031
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 712%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 670.9%
#22

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.019031
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 712%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 670.9%
#23

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.024688 (rounded ~ $0.02)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 953.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 900%
#24

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.027188 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1060%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1001.3%
#25

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.028125 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1100%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1039.2%
#26

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.031500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1244%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1175.9%
#27

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.031500 (rounded ~ $0.03)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1244%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1175.9%
#28

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.039500
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1585.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1500%
#29

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.046875 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1798.7%
#30

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.046875 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1798.7%
#31

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.046875 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1798.7%
#32

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.046875 (rounded ~ $0.05)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1798.7%
#33

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.049375
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2006.7%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1900%
#34

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.049375
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2006.7%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1900%
#35

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.049375
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2006.7%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1900%
#36

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.049375
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2006.7%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 1900%
#37

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.088750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3686.7%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 3494.9%
#38

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.089063
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3700%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 3507.6%
#39

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.089063
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3700%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 3507.6%
#40

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 3697.5%
#41

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 3697.5%
#42

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.098750 (rounded ~ $0.10)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 4113.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 3900%
#43

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.177500 (rounded ~ $0.18)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 7473.3%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 7089.9%
#44

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 7900%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 7494.9%
#45

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.228375 (rounded ~ $0.23)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 9644%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 9150.6%
#46

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.228375 (rounded ~ $0.23)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 9644%
vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: ↑ 9150.6%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

When evaluating cost-effective AI for legal contract analysis, comparing Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.6 and Google’s Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers distinct advantages. Claude Haiku 4.6 is celebrated for its remarkable speed and affordability, making it a go-to for rapid clause extraction where latency is critical and budgets are tight. Its efficiency allows for swift processing of numerous contracts, ideal for early-stage projects. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, on the other hand, provides a broader capability set, including strong multimodal understanding and a generous 1M context window, offering flexibility for more complex document analyses or potential future integrations. For data analysts prototyping legal review tools, the choice hinges on whether to prioritize raw speed and cost (Haiku) or a more versatile, large-context platform (Gemini Flash Lite). Both serve as excellent entry points for understanding AI-driven legal tech cost dynamics.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Related model pricing

Claude Haiku 4.6 currently costs $0.25 / $1.25 per 1M tokens. These are the models worth pricing against it, taken live from the tracked registry.

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

See every tracked AI pricing change →