What are cached tokens and how do they save money?

Cached tokens are repeated input tokens (like system prompts or conversation history) that providers charge at a discounted rate. Anthropic offers varying discounts for cached tokens (typically 50-80%). Your calculation saves money by applying caching to 50% of input tokens for optimized cost savings.

When should I use Batch API vs real-time API?

Use Batch API for non-realtime processing of large volumes where latency isn't critical (saves up to 40-60%). Use real-time API for interactive applications like chatbots. Batch processing is ideal for data analysis, content generation in bulk, and offline processing.

What should I consider when comparing different AI models?

When comparing AI models, focus on factors such as performance, accuracy, response speed, cost, scalability, and how well the model fits your specific use case. The right choice depends on your workload, budget, and the type of tasks you want the AI to handle. Using an AI cost and time calculator can help you make an informed, data-driven decision.

Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: Per-Call Cost for 100K-Token Support Logs

Name: Gemini 3.1 Flash
Brand: Google
Price: 0.02 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.5 (89 reviews)

Claude Haiku 4.6 is no longer available

This model has been withdrawn by its provider and can no longer be called. The figures below are kept as a historical record and do not reflect a currently purchasable rate.

See current Claude Haiku 4.5 pricing → · All recent pricing changes

Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash

Complete Comparison: 100,000 input tokens × 1,000 output tokens

⚡ 50% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 50% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API

Comparison Criteria	Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (50% cached)
Input Tokens	100,000	100,000
Output Tokens	1,000	1,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost	$0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)Best	$0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)Worst
Output Cost	$0.000313Best	$0.001500Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR)	$0.000000	$0.000000
Service Fees	$0.000000	$0.000000
Total Cost	$0.003750 Best Value	$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02) Most Expensive
Processing Time	2 minutes, 4.94 seconds Fastest	2 minutes, 12.74 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second	850Fastest	800Slowest
Time to First Token	75ms Best	100ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens	$0.000037Best	$0.000151Worst
Tokens per Dollar	26,933,333Best Value	6,622,951Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base)	$0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)Best	$0.250000Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base)	$0.312500 (rounded ~ $0.31)Best	$1.500000Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13)Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized)	$0.156250 (rounded ~ $0.16)Best Optimizations: 50.0% batch	$0.750000Worst Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Video Support	✗ Not Supported	✓ Supported
Audio Support	✗ Not Supported	✓ Supported
Caching Support 50	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Batch API Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support	✓ Supported	✓ Supported

Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Provider

Model

Second Model

Provider

Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic

$0.003750

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✗ Not Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✗ Not Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.006563 (rounded ~ $0.01) Input: $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000313

Optimized Cost $0.003750 Input: $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.000313
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.002813 42.9% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output Cost: $0.000313
Total Cost: $0.003750
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000037
Tokens per dollar: 26,933,333 tokens
Context Window: 200000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 75ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 2 minutes, 4.94 seconds
Latency: 75 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 810 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

High-throughput support log analysis and automated intent routing.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Haiku 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google 1000000

$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)

Total Cost

⚡ 50% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools

👁️

Vision/Images

✓ Available

🎧

Audio Processing

✓ Available

🎥

Video Analysis

✓ Available

🔧

Tool Usage

✓ Available

📄

OCR Support

✗ Not Available

📊

Batch API

✓ Available

⚡

Caching

✓ Available

90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.026500 (rounded ~ $0.03) Input: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.001500

Optimized Cost $0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02) Input: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.001500
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000

Total Savings $0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01) 42.5% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API

50.0% off

Asynchronous processing discount

📊 Dynamic Tier

Standard

tier1 pricing based on 0 tokens

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 100,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:

Input Cost: $0.025000 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output Cost: $0.001500
Total Cost: $0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000151
Tokens per dollar: 6,622,951 tokens
Context Window: 1000000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 800 tokens per second and 100ms time to first token:

Processing Time: 2 minutes, 12.74 seconds
Latency: 100 milliseconds to first token
Base Throughput: 800 tokens/second
Effective Throughput: 762 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

High-throughput support log analysis and automated intent routing.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Flash. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Haiku 4.6

📋 Active Input Parameters

Input Tokens: 100,000

Output Tokens: 1,000

Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)

Cached Tokens: 50%

Tools: Enabled

Rank	AI Model & Provider	Total Cost	vs Claude Haiku 4.6	vs Gemini 3.1 Flash
🏆	Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI	$0.001450 Best Value	↓ 61.3% cheaper	↓ 90.5% cheaper
🥈	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google	$0.003813	↑ 1.7% more	↓ 75% cheaper
🥉	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google	$0.004750	↑ 26.7% more	↓ 68.9% cheaper
#4	Gemini 2.5 Flash Google	$0.004750	↑ 26.7% more	↓ 68.9% cheaper
#5	Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI	$0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 93.3% more	↓ 52.5% cheaper
#6	Gemini 3.8 Flash Google	$0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 200% more	↓ 26.2% cheaper
#7	GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI	$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 205% more	↓ 25% cheaper
#8	o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI	$0.014750 (rounded ~ $0.01)	↑ 293.3% more	↓ 3.3% cheaper
#9	Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic	$0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 300% more	↓ 1.6% cheaper
#10	Gemini 3.1 Flash Google	$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 306.7% more	Same price
#11	GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI	$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 306.7% more	Same price
#12	o4-mini OpenAI	$0.016225 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 332.7% more	↑ 6.4% more
#13	Gemini 3.6 Flash Google	$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 500% more	↑ 47.5% more
#14	Gemini 3.5 Flash Google	$0.022875 (rounded ~ $0.02)	↑ 510% more	↑ 50% more
#15	GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI	$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↑ 635% more	↑ 80.7% more
#16	GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI	$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03)	↑ 635% more	↑ 80.7% more
#17	Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic	$0.030000	↑ 700% more	↑ 96.7% more
#18	GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI	$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04)	↑ 916.7% more	↑ 150% more
#19	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	$0.039375	↑ 950% more	↑ 158.2% more
#20	Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	$0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)	↑ 1100% more	↑ 195.1% more
#21	Grok 4.3 xAI	$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 1420% more	↑ 273.8% more
#22	Grok 4.20 Beta xAI	$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 1420% more	↑ 273.8% more
#23	Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	$0.061000 (rounded ~ $0.06)	↑ 1526.7% more	↑ 300% more
#24	Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic	$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 1900% more	↑ 391.8% more
#25	Claude Opus 5 Anthropic	$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 1900% more	↑ 391.8% more
#26	Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 1900% more	↑ 391.8% more
#27	Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 1900% more	↑ 391.8% more
#28	GPT-5.4 OpenAI	$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 1933.3% more	↑ 400% more
#29	GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI	$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 1933.3% more	↑ 400% more
#30	GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI	$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 1933.3% more	↑ 400% more
#31	GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI	$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)	↑ 1933.3% more	↑ 400% more
#32	Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic	$0.140625	↑ 3650% more	↑ 822.1% more
#33	Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic	$0.140625	↑ 3650% more	↑ 822.1% more
#34	o3 Deep Research OpenAI	$0.147500 (rounded ~ $0.15)	↑ 3833.3% more	↑ 867.2% more
#35	Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	$0.150000	↑ 3900% more	↑ 883.6% more
#36	Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	$0.150000	↑ 3900% more	↑ 883.6% more
#37	GPT-5.5 OpenAI	$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15)	↑ 3966.7% more	↑ 900% more
#38	o3 Pro OpenAI	$0.295000 (rounded ~ $0.30)	↑ 7766.7% more	↑ 1834.4% more
#39	GPT-6 Astra OpenAI	$0.300000	↑ 7900% more	↑ 1867.2% more
#40	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.330750	↑ 8720% more	↑ 2068.9% more
#41	GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI	$0.330750	↑ 8720% more	↑ 2068.9% more

🏆

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

$0.001450

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↓ 61.3%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↓ 90.5%

🥈

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.003813

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↓ 75%

🥉

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.004750

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 26.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↓ 68.9%

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.004750

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 26.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↓ 68.9%

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

$0.007250 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 93.3%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↓ 52.5%

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.011250 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 200%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↓ 26.2%

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

$0.011438 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 205%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↓ 25%

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.014750 (rounded ~ $0.01)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 293.3%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↓ 3.3%

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

$0.015000 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 300%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↓ 1.6%

#10

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 306.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: Same

#11

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.015250 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 306.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: Same

#12

o4-mini
OpenAI

$0.016225 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 332.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 6.4%

#13

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.022500 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 500%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 47.5%

#14

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.022875 (rounded ~ $0.02)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 510%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 50%

#15

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 635%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 80.7%

#16

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

$0.027563 (rounded ~ $0.03)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 635%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 80.7%

#17

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.030000

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 700%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 96.7%

#18

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$0.038125 (rounded ~ $0.04)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 916.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 150%

#19

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$0.039375

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 950%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 158.2%

#20

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$0.045000 (rounded ~ $0.05)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1100%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 195.1%

#21

Grok 4.3
xAI

$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1420%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 273.8%

#22

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$0.057000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1420%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 273.8%

#23

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$0.061000 (rounded ~ $0.06)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1526.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 300%

#24

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 391.8%

#25

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 391.8%

#26

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 391.8%

#27

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$0.075000 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 391.8%

#28

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1933.3%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 400%

#29

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1933.3%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 400%

#30

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1933.3%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 400%

#31

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$0.076250 (rounded ~ $0.08)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1933.3%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 400%

#32

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$0.140625

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3650%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 822.1%

#33

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$0.140625

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3650%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 822.1%

#34

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

$0.147500 (rounded ~ $0.15)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3833.3%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 867.2%

#35

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$0.150000

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 883.6%

#36

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$0.150000

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 883.6%

#37

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$0.152500 (rounded ~ $0.15)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3966.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 900%

#38

o3 Pro
OpenAI

$0.295000 (rounded ~ $0.30)

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 7766.7%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 1834.4%

#39

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$0.300000

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 7900%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 1867.2%

#40

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.330750

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 8720%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 2068.9%

#41

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

$0.330750

vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 8720%

vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: ↑ 2068.9%

✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

Choosing the Right Model for Large-Scale Support Logs

For engineering teams handling 100K-token support logs per request, the choice between Claude Haiku 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Flash often boils down to balancing throughput against reasoning depth. These high-volume pipelines demand models that can process vast context windows without stalling or failing on complex, multi-turn customer interactions.

Claude Haiku 4.6 shines in environments requiring extreme efficiency. Its architecture is purpose-built for classification, routing, and extraction tasks, making it an ideal candidate for triage pipelines where you need to interpret intent from lengthy support threads before passing them to human agents or more capable reasoning models. Its consistent performance across long context windows makes it predictable for automated workflows.

Gemini 3.1 Flash, by contrast, offers robust multimodal capabilities and high-speed processing for larger batches. If your support logs contain screenshots, document attachments, or multi-media diagnostic data, Gemini’s native multimodal understanding provides a streamlined integration that avoids the need for complex, multi-step API chains. It is particularly effective for RAG-based support systems where the model must query extensive knowledge bases to answer specific, technically dense customer inquiries.

When selecting between them, consider your existing infrastructure. Teams already deep in the Google Cloud ecosystem benefit from Gemini’s seamless integration with Vertex AI, while teams prioritizing strict adherence to structured outputs and nuanced, instruction-following tasks often prefer the Claude API ecosystem.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?

Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.

How does prompt caching work?

Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.

How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?

Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.

What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?

The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.

Claude Haiku 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash: Per-Call Cost for 100K-Token Support Logs

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

First Model

Second Model

Select AI Model

Claude Haiku 4.6

Calculate Token Costs

📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

Model Comparison

Model Information

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking

🔧 Special Modes

📚 Research & Citations

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video

Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google 1000000

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

Speed & Performance Analysis

Best Use Cases

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash Google

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

o4-mini OpenAI

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

Grok 4.3 xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta xAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro Google

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic

o3 Deep Research OpenAI

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

o3 Pro OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

Choosing the Right Model for Large-Scale Support Logs

Frequently Asked Questions

Related model pricing

Compare across providers

Other models from the same provider

Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI

o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

o4-mini
OpenAI

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI

GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

Grok 4.3
xAI

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

o3 Deep Research
OpenAI

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

o3 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI