Claude Haiku 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 mini: Email Drafting for 500K-Token Daily Workloads

Claude Haiku 4.6 is no longer available

This model has been withdrawn by its provider and can no longer be called. The figures below are kept as a historical record and do not reflect a currently purchasable rate.

See current Claude Haiku 4.5 pricing →  ·  All recent pricing changes

Claude Haiku 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 mini
Complete Comparison: 500,000 input tokens × 300,000 output tokens
Comparison Mode
⚡ 20% Cached

Complete comparison of pricing, performance, and capabilities for 2 leading AI models with 20% Cached.

⚡ Caching Optimized (up to 90% savings) 📊 Batch API
Comparison Criteria Claude Haiku 4.6
Anthropic
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
Calculation Results (Current Inputs) (20% cached)
Input Tokens 500,000 500,000
Output Tokens 300,000 300,000
Cost Breakdown
Input Cost $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)Best $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Worst
Output Cost $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Best $0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34)Worst
Unit Cost (Audio/OCR) $0.000000 $0.000000
Service Fees $0.000000 $0.000000
Total Cost $0.119375 Best Value $0.414375 (rounded ~ $0.41) Most Expensive
Processing Time 16 minutes, 47.24 seconds Fastest 28 minutes, 32.18 seconds Slowest
Tokens per Second 850Fastest 500Slowest
Time to First Token 75ms Best 180ms Worst
Cost per 1K tokens $0.000149Best $0.000518Worst
Tokens per Dollar 6,701,571Best Value 1,930,618Worst Value
Cost per 1 Million Tokens (Informational)
Input Cost / 1M (Base) $0.062500 (rounded ~ $0.06)Best $0.187500 (rounded ~ $0.19)Worst
Output Cost / 1M (Base) $0.312500 (rounded ~ $0.31)Best $1.125000 (rounded ~ $1.13)Worst
Input Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Output Cost / 1M (Optimized) $0.156250 (rounded ~ $0.16)Best
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
$0.562500 (rounded ~ $0.56)Worst
Optimizations: 50.0% batch
Capabilities & Advanced Features
Images Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Caching Support
20
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Batch API Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Tool Usage Support ✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Scroll horizontally to see all data

🔄 Compare Different AI Models

1

First Model

2

Second Model

Select providers and models above, then click "Compare Models" to update the comparison.
All other parameters will be preserved from the current comparison.

Click Recalculate to update after making changes

ℹ️ Bulk Calculation: Total volume exceeds single-request limit of 200,000 tokens. Budgeting mode active.

Select AI Model

Claude Haiku 4.6
AnthropicMax Context: 200,000 tokens
$0.25 / $1.25 per 1M tokens
Use Batch API (50% discount)
20%
Provider-specific multipliers applied after all calculations
Enable for cache discounts
Select platform to enforce context limits
Number of requests (max 1M). Summary view auto-enabled >10k.

Calculate Token Costs

$0.025000 Input Cost
$0.093750 Output Cost
$0.000000 Unit Cost
$0.000000 Search Cost
$0.000000 Request Fee
$0.000000 Tool Fee
$0.000000 Code Execution
800,000Total Tokens
$0.000149Cost per 1K
6,701,571Tokens per $
📊 Advanced Cost Breakdown

Processing Speed

16m 47s Processing Time
850 Tokens/Second
75ms Time to First Token
794 Effective Speed

Model Comparison

Select a model to see comparisons with competitors.

Model Information

Select a model to see detailed information.

🔄 Advanced Options

⚡ Optimization
Flat fee per session (e.g., $0.03 for Code Interpreter)
Hourly storage fee for cached data
First 50 hours free, $0.05/hour after

🧠 Reasoning & Thinking
Manual thinking tokens (billed at output rate)

🔧 Special Modes
Enable 6.0x Fast Mode multiplier

📚 Research & Citations
Enable $1.00/$4.00 rates + $10.00/1k search
Enable research tier pricing
Fee per source cited

🎤 Realtime Audio & Video
Session length for billing
📊 Multiple Models Detected: This page contains data for 2 models. See the detailed comparison table above, and switch between models using tabs below.

Claude Haiku 4.6 Anthropic

$0.119375
Total Cost
⚠️ Bulk Calculation: Total volume exceeds single-request limit of 200,000 tokens. Budgeting mode active.
⚡ 20% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.125000 (rounded ~ $0.13) Input: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
Optimized Cost $0.119375 Input: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
Output: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.005625 (rounded ~ $0.01) 4.5% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 500,000 input tokens and 300,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.031250 (rounded ~ $0.03)
  • Output Cost: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
  • Total Cost: $0.119375
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000149
  • Tokens per dollar: 6,701,571 tokens
  • Context Window: 200000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 850 tokens per second and 75ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 16 minutes, 47.24 seconds
  • Latency: 75 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 850 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 794 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Claude Haiku 4.6 is best for warmempathetic email drafting where writing quality is paramount; GPT-5.4 mini is ideal for complexintegrated agentic workflows.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for Claude Haiku 4.6. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

$0.414375 (rounded ~ $0.41)
Total Cost
⚠️ Bulk Calculation: Total volume exceeds single-request limit of 400,000 tokens. Budgeting mode active.
⚡ 20% Cached 📊 Batch API 🔧 Tools
👁️
Vision/Images
✓ Available
🎧
Audio Processing
✗ Not Available
🎥
Video Analysis
✗ Not Available
🔧
Tool Usage
✓ Available
📄
OCR Support
✗ Not Available
📊
Batch API
✓ Available
Caching
✓ Available
90% savings

💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)

Base Cost (No Optimizations) $0.431250 (rounded ~ $0.43) Input: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
Output: $0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34)
Optimized Cost $0.414375 (rounded ~ $0.41) Input: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
Output: $0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Total Savings $0.016875 (rounded ~ $0.02) 3.9% discount

Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)

📊 Batch API
50.0% off
Asynchronous processing discount

Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)

For 500,000 input tokens and 300,000 output tokens:

  • Input Cost: $0.093750 (rounded ~ $0.09)
  • Output Cost: $0.337500 (rounded ~ $0.34)
  • Total Cost: $0.414375 (rounded ~ $0.41)
  • Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000518
  • Tokens per dollar: 1,930,618 tokens
  • Context Window: 400000 tokens

Speed & Performance Analysis

With a processing speed of 500 tokens per second and 180ms time to first token:

  • Processing Time: 28 minutes, 32.18 seconds
  • Latency: 180 milliseconds to first token
  • Base Throughput: 500 tokens/second
  • Effective Throughput: 467 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)

Best Use Cases

Claude Haiku 4.6 is best for warmempathetic email drafting where writing quality is paramount; GPT-5.4 mini is ideal for complexintegrated agentic workflows.

Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?

This calculator shows the math for GPT-5.4 mini. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.

Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.

Get my instant AI audit — $39 →

✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry

← Back to Claude Haiku 4.6
📋 Active Input Parameters
Input Tokens: 500,000
Output Tokens: 300,000
Batch API: Enabled (50% discount)
Cached Tokens: 20%
Tools: Enabled
Rank AI Model & Provider Total Cost vs Claude Haiku 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 mini
🏆 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
$0.138125 (rounded ~ $0.14) Best Value ↑ 15.7% more ↓ 66.7% cheaper
🥈 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
$0.218250 (rounded ~ $0.22) ↑ 82.8% more ↓ 47.3% cheaper
🥉 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
$0.218250 (rounded ~ $0.22) ↑ 82.8% more ↓ 47.3% cheaper
#4 Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36) ↑ 200% more ↓ 13.6% cheaper
#5 GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
$0.552500 (rounded ~ $0.55) ↑ 362.8% more ↑ 33.3% more
#6 Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
$0.716250 (rounded ~ $0.72) ↑ 500% more ↑ 72.9% more
#7 Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
$0.828750 (rounded ~ $0.83) ↑ 594.2% more ↑ 100% more
#8 Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
$0.955000 (rounded ~ $0.96) ↑ 700% more ↑ 130.5% more
#9 Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
$1.105000 (rounded ~ $1.11) ↑ 825.7% more ↑ 166.7% more
#10 GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
$1.381250 (rounded ~ $1.38) ↑ 1057.1% more ↑ 233.3% more
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
$1.432500 (rounded ~ $1.43) ↑ 1100% more ↑ 245.7% more
#12 Grok 4.3
xAI
$2.020000 ↑ 1592.1% more ↑ 387.5% more
#13 Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
$2.020000 ↑ 1592.1% more ↑ 387.5% more
#14 Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 476.2% more
#15 Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 476.2% more
#16 Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 476.2% more
#17 Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39) ↑ 1900% more ↑ 476.2% more
#18 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
$2.762500 (rounded ~ $2.76) ↑ 2214.1% more ↑ 566.7% more
#19 GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
$2.762500 (rounded ~ $2.76) ↑ 2214.1% more ↑ 566.7% more
#20 Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$3.520000 ↑ 2848.7% more ↑ 749.5% more
#21 GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$4.400000 ↑ 3585.9% more ↑ 961.8% more
#22 GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
$4.400000 ↑ 3585.9% more ↑ 961.8% more
#23 Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
$4.756250 (rounded ~ $4.76) ↑ 3884.3% more ↑ 1047.8% more
#24 Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
$4.756250 (rounded ~ $4.76) ↑ 3884.3% more ↑ 1047.8% more
#25 Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
$4.775000 (rounded ~ $4.78) ↑ 3900% more ↑ 1052.3% more
#26 Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
$4.775000 (rounded ~ $4.78) ↑ 3900% more ↑ 1052.3% more
#27 GPT-5.5
OpenAI
$8.800000 ↑ 7271.7% more ↑ 2023.7% more
#28 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$19.100000 ↑ 15900% more ↑ 4509.4% more
#29 GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
$19.100000 ↑ 15900% more ↑ 4509.4% more
🏆

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google

$0.138125 (rounded ~ $0.14)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 15.7%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 66.7%
🥈

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google

$0.218250 (rounded ~ $0.22)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 82.8%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 47.3%
🥉

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google

$0.218250 (rounded ~ $0.22)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 82.8%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 47.3%
#4

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google

$0.358125 (rounded ~ $0.36)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 200%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↓ 13.6%
#5

GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI

$0.552500 (rounded ~ $0.55)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 362.8%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 33.3%
#6

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google

$0.716250 (rounded ~ $0.72)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 500%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 72.9%
#7

Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google

$0.828750 (rounded ~ $0.83)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 594.2%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 100%
#8

Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic

$0.955000 (rounded ~ $0.96)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 700%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 130.5%
#9

Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google

$1.105000 (rounded ~ $1.11)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 825.7%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 166.7%
#10

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI

$1.381250 (rounded ~ $1.38)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1057.1%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 233.3%
#11

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic

$1.432500 (rounded ~ $1.43)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1100%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 245.7%
#12

Grok 4.3
xAI

$2.020000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1592.1%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 387.5%
#13

Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI

$2.020000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1592.1%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 387.5%
#14

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic

$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 476.2%
#15

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic

$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 476.2%
#16

Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic

$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 476.2%
#17

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic

$2.387500 (rounded ~ $2.39)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 1900%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 476.2%
#18

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google

$2.762500 (rounded ~ $2.76)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2214.1%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 566.7%
#19

GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI

$2.762500 (rounded ~ $2.76)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2214.1%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 566.7%
#20

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google

$3.520000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 2848.7%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 749.5%
#21

GPT-5.4
OpenAI

$4.400000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3585.9%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 961.8%
#22

GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI

$4.400000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3585.9%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 961.8%
#23

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic

$4.756250 (rounded ~ $4.76)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3884.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1047.8%
#24

Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic

$4.756250 (rounded ~ $4.76)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3884.3%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1047.8%
#25

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic

$4.775000 (rounded ~ $4.78)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1052.3%
#26

Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic

$4.775000 (rounded ~ $4.78)
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 3900%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 1052.3%
#27

GPT-5.5
OpenAI

$8.800000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 7271.7%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 2023.7%
#28

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$19.100000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 15900%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 4509.4%
#29

GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI

$19.100000
vs Claude Haiku 4.6: ↑ 15900%
vs GPT-5.4 mini: ↑ 4509.4%
✨ How recommendations work (v8.6.0): We scan all active models in the registry and only include those that support ALL your current inputs. For token-based models, we check if they can handle your token counts. For special pricing models (OCR, video, audio), we verify they have the correct pricing structure. Features marked requested were in your inputs but not supported by that model. Now using official provider pricing without reseller markups.

For customer support leads managing high-volume email workflows, selecting the right model is less about raw intelligence and more about latency, reliability, and tone consistency. When drafting 500 personalized emails daily—requiring roughly 500,000 input tokens—you need an engine that balances speed with the nuance required for professional communication. Claude Haiku 4.6 and GPT-5.4 mini both position themselves as the primary contenders for this scale, yet they excel in different operational environments. Claude Haiku 4.6 is frequently praised for its human-like writing voice. It often requires less prompt engineering to avoid the ‘robotic’ tone that plagues automated email systems, making it a strong choice if your primary goal is maintaining brand warmth and empathy across diverse customer scenarios. Its ability to adhere to structured instructions makes it reliable for consistent email formatting. Conversely, GPT-5.4 mini offers a distinct advantage in tool-integration and architectural flexibility. If your email drafting pipeline is part of a larger, complex agentic workflow—where the model must call tools, search internal databases, or interact with other APIs before finalizing the text—GPT-5.4 mini often provides more robust support. Its ecosystem maturity means it plugs into existing development stacks with minimal friction. When deciding between the two, consider your infrastructure constraints. If you prioritize writing quality and natural language nuances for customer-facing support, Claude often wins. If you need a workhorse model that integrates deeply into a complex, multi-step automation pipeline, GPT-5.4 mini is likely the more efficient architectural fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate are these AI model cost calculations?
Our calculations are based on official pricing from each provider (Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Mistral) and are updated regularly. We account for all factors including multimodal inputs, caching discounts, batch API pricing, tool usage multipliers, OCR processing, audio minutes, silence fees, and research mode pricing. Note: Reseller markups and dedicated instance multipliers have been removed to reflect official provider pricing.
How does prompt caching work?
Caching discounts vary by provider: Google and OpenAI offer 90% discounts on cached input tokens. Anthropic uses write (1.25x) and read (0.10x) multipliers. Savings are applied to the token portion only, not unit-based fees.
How do Market Recommendations work (v8.6.0)?
Our recommendation engine scans the entire model registry and only includes models that support ALL your current input parameters (tokens, images, video, audio, OCR, tools, batch API, etc.). It calculates exact costs with your settings and sorts by price, showing you the best value options that can handle your complete workflow. Special pricing models (OCR, video, audio, image generation) are properly handled and only appear when their specific input types are requested. v8.6.0 removes reseller markups (20% buffer) and dedicated instance multipliers to reflect official provider pricing.
What is the YemHub AI Calculator Tool?
The YemHub AI Calculator is the most comprehensive tool for estimating costs and comparing performance metrics across 50+ AI models. It calculates token-based pricing, analyzes multimodal processing, accounts for state-dependent pricing (context cliffs, tiered tunnels), provides optimization recommendations, and now offers intelligent market matching to find the best alternatives for your specific needs.