Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Multimodal Input Details
Resolution: Medium
Tokens: 51,600,000
Cost: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $64.625000 (rounded ~ $64.63)
- Output Cost: $0.012500 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $35.556250 (rounded ~ $35.56)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000688
- Tokens per dollar: 1,454,090 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 59 hours, 6 minutes, 13.80 seconds
- Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 243 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 2000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Output: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Multimodal Input Details
Resolution: Medium
Tokens: 51,600,000
Cost: $0.000000
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 100,000 input tokens and 2,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $103.400000
- Output Cost: $0.018000 (rounded ~ $0.02)
- Total Cost: $56.888000 (rounded ~ $56.89)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001100
- Tokens per dollar: 908,838 tokens
- Context Window: 2000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 38 hours, 25 minutes, 3.03 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 374 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Opus 4.7| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Opus 4.7 | vs Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
|
$0.711025 (rounded ~ $0.71) Best Value | ↓ 98% cheaper | ↓ 98.8% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$1.777938 (rounded ~ $1.78) | ↓ 95% cheaper | ↓ 96.9% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$2.133875 (rounded ~ $2.13) | ↓ 94% cheaper | ↓ 96.2% cheaper |
| #4 |
Mistral Large 3
Mistral AI
|
$3.555375 (rounded ~ $3.56) | ↓ 90% cheaper | ↓ 93.8% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
|
$5.333813 (rounded ~ $5.33) | ↓ 85% cheaper | ↓ 90.6% cheaper |
| #6 |
o4-mini Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$7.110750 | ↓ 80% cheaper | ↓ 87.5% cheaper |
| #7 |
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
|
$7.111250 (rounded ~ $7.11) | ↓ 80% cheaper | ↓ 87.5% cheaper |
| #8 |
o4-mini
OpenAI
|
$7.821825 (rounded ~ $7.82) | ↓ 78% cheaper | ↓ 86.3% cheaper |
| #9 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$8.887188 (rounded ~ $8.89) | ↓ 75% cheaper | ↓ 84.4% cheaper |
| #10 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$10.667625 (rounded ~ $10.67) | ↓ 70% cheaper | ↓ 81.2% cheaper |
| #11 |
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
OpenAI
|
$12.447313 (rounded ~ $12.45) | ↓ 65% cheaper | ↓ 78.1% cheaper |
| #12 |
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
|
$12.447313 (rounded ~ $12.45) | ↓ 65% cheaper | ↓ 78.1% cheaper |
| #13 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$14.223500 (rounded ~ $14.22) | ↓ 60% cheaper | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$21.333750 (rounded ~ $21.33) | ↓ 40% cheaper | ↓ 62.5% cheaper |
| #15 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$35.556250 (rounded ~ $35.56) | Same price | ↓ 37.5% cheaper |
| #16 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$35.556250 (rounded ~ $35.56) | Same price | ↓ 37.5% cheaper |
| #17 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$35.558750 (rounded ~ $35.56) | Same price | ↓ 37.5% cheaper |
| #18 |
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
|
$35.558750 (rounded ~ $35.56) | Same price | ↓ 37.5% cheaper |
| #19 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$56.888000 (rounded ~ $56.89) | ↑ 60% more | Same price |
| #20 |
o3 Deep Research
OpenAI
|
$71.107500 (rounded ~ $71.11) | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 25% more |
| #21 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$71.110000 | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 25% more |
| #22 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$71.110000 | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 25% more |
| #23 |
o3 Pro
OpenAI
|
$142.215000 (rounded ~ $142.22) | ↑ 300% more | ↑ 150% more |
| #24 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$142.220000 | ↑ 300% more | ↑ 150% more |
| #25 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$149.367750 (rounded ~ $149.37) | ↑ 320.1% more | ↑ 162.6% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI
|
$149.367750 (rounded ~ $149.37) | ↑ 320.1% more | ↑ 162.6% more |
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI
GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI
o4-mini Deep Research OpenAI
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
o4-mini OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Instant OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
o3 Deep Research OpenAI
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
o3 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI
Enterprise Image Analysis: Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro
For educational content creators producing AI-assisted curricula, choosing between leading multimodal models for analyzing product photos is crucial. Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro both offer advanced vision capabilities, essential for understanding intricate product details that inform image variation generation. Claude Opus 4.7 excels with its enhanced high-resolution image support, allowing for more precise interpretation of fine details in complex visual inputs. This makes it ideal for tasks requiring deep inspection of visual data.
Gemini 3.1 Pro, on the other hand, boasts broader multimodal ingestion, seamlessly handling text, audio, video, and images, making it a versatile choice for integrated workflows. While both models offer extensive context windows suitable for enterprise-scale processing, differences in their specific visual reasoning strengths and ecosystem integration may sway your decision. Evaluating which model better captures the nuance of your product imagery will directly impact the quality and consistency of subsequent AI-generated variations.