Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Output: $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 800,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $1.000000
- Output Cost: $0.006250 (rounded ~ $0.01)
- Total Cost: $0.556250 (rounded ~ $0.56)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.000694
- Tokens per dollar: 1,440,000 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 260 tokens per second and 400ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 52 minutes, 53.37 seconds
- Latency: 400 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 260 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 252 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Claude Opus 4.7. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 1000000
💰 Total Cost Calculation (from Plugin)
Output: $0.009000
Output: $0.009000
Unit: $0.000000
Fees: $0.000000
Advanced Cost Breakdown (from Plugin)
Detailed Cost Analysis (from Plugin)
For 800,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens:
- Input Cost: $1.600000
- Output Cost: $0.009000
- Total Cost: $0.889000 (rounded ~ $0.89)
- Cost per 1K tokens: $0.001110
- Tokens per dollar: 901,012 tokens
- Context Window: 1000000 tokens
Speed & Performance Analysis
With a processing speed of 400 tokens per second and 220ms time to first token:
- Processing Time: 34 minutes, 22.76 seconds
- Latency: 220 milliseconds to first token
- Base Throughput: 400 tokens/second
- Effective Throughput: 388 tokens/second (temperature-adjusted)
Best Use Cases
Want this applied to YOUR actual stack?
This calculator shows the math for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Your decision needs more — current infrastructure, compliance requirements, actual workload patterns, volume tiers — that change which model is right for you.
Get a $39 personalized AI Architecture Audit. PDF tailored to your stack, delivered in under 60 seconds. 7-day no-questions-asked refund.
Get my instant AI audit — $39 →✨ Market Recommendations AI Model Registry
← Back to Claude Opus 4.7| Rank | AI Model & Provider | Total Cost | vs Claude Opus 4.7 | vs Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google
|
$0.027875 (rounded ~ $0.03) Best Value | ↓ 95% cheaper | ↓ 96.9% cheaper |
| 🥈 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
|
$0.033625 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 94% cheaper | ↓ 96.2% cheaper |
| 🥉 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.033625 (rounded ~ $0.03) | ↓ 94% cheaper | ↓ 96.2% cheaper |
| #4 |
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
|
$0.083438 (rounded ~ $0.08) | ↓ 85% cheaper | ↓ 90.6% cheaper |
| #5 |
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
|
$0.111500 (rounded ~ $0.11) | ↓ 80% cheaper | ↓ 87.5% cheaper |
| #6 |
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
|
$0.166875 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↓ 70% cheaper | ↓ 81.2% cheaper |
| #7 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
|
$0.167250 (rounded ~ $0.17) | ↓ 69.9% cheaper | ↓ 81.2% cheaper |
| #8 |
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
|
$0.222500 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↓ 60% cheaper | ↓ 75% cheaper |
| #9 |
Gemini 3.1 Flash
Google
|
$0.223000 (rounded ~ $0.22) | ↓ 59.9% cheaper | ↓ 74.9% cheaper |
| #10 |
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
|
$0.278750 (rounded ~ $0.28) | ↓ 49.9% cheaper | ↓ 68.6% cheaper |
| #11 |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.333750 (rounded ~ $0.33) | ↓ 40% cheaper | ↓ 62.5% cheaper |
| #12 |
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
|
$0.556250 (rounded ~ $0.56) | Same price | ↓ 37.4% cheaper |
| #13 |
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
|
$0.556250 (rounded ~ $0.56) | Same price | ↓ 37.4% cheaper |
| #14 |
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
|
$0.556250 (rounded ~ $0.56) | Same price | ↓ 37.4% cheaper |
| #15 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
|
$0.557500 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 0.2% more | ↓ 37.3% cheaper |
| #16 |
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
|
$0.557500 (rounded ~ $0.56) | ↑ 0.2% more | ↓ 37.3% cheaper |
| #17 |
Grok 4.3
xAI
|
$0.884000 (rounded ~ $0.88) | ↑ 58.9% more | ↓ 0.6% cheaper |
| #18 |
Grok 4.20 Beta
xAI
|
$0.884000 (rounded ~ $0.88) | ↑ 58.9% more | ↓ 0.6% cheaper |
| #19 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
|
$0.889000 (rounded ~ $0.89) | ↑ 59.8% more | Same price |
| #20 |
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
|
$1.037500 (rounded ~ $1.04) | ↑ 86.5% more | ↑ 16.7% more |
| #21 |
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
|
$1.037500 (rounded ~ $1.04) | ↑ 86.5% more | ↑ 16.7% more |
| #22 |
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
|
$1.111250 (rounded ~ $1.11) | ↑ 99.8% more | ↑ 25% more |
| #23 |
GPT-5.4 Thinking
OpenAI
|
$1.111250 (rounded ~ $1.11) | ↑ 99.8% more | ↑ 25% more |
| #24 |
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
|
$1.112500 (rounded ~ $1.11) | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 25.1% more |
| #25 |
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
|
$1.112500 (rounded ~ $1.11) | ↑ 100% more | ↑ 25.1% more |
| #26 |
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
|
$2.222500 (rounded ~ $2.22) | ↑ 299.6% more | ↑ 150% more |
| #27 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$4.450000 | ↑ 700% more | ↑ 400.6% more |
| #28 |
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
|
$4.450000 | ↑ 700% more | ↑ 400.6% more |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI
Gemini 3.6 Flash Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Google
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic
Gemini 3.1 Flash Google
GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Grok 4.20 Beta xAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5.1 Anthropic
GPT-5.4 OpenAI
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI
Choosing Between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro for High-Volume RAG
When engineering RAG pipelines that ingest 800K-token document sets, the choice between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro often hinges on the specific nature of your retrieval requirements and downstream reasoning needs. Both models offer massive context windows that allow for loading entire document corpora directly, but their operational strengths diverge in production.
Claude Opus 4.7 excels in scenarios requiring rigorous multi-step reasoning, high-fidelity instruction following, and nuanced creative outputs. If your use case involves extracting complex legal or financial insights where document coherence is paramount, Opus 4.7’s structural intelligence often yields superior results. It is particularly effective at self-verification, which reduces the need for heavy-handed post-processing agents.
Gemini 3.1 Pro, conversely, is built for scale and native multimodality. Its architecture is heavily optimized for massive information synthesis. If your document pipelines are heavily multimodal—containing embedded charts, technical diagrams, or complex layouts—Gemini 3.1 Pro’s native vision capabilities provide a distinct advantage. Furthermore, developers frequently find that Gemini’s performance at the edge of its context window is highly consistent, making it a robust choice for high-volume, automated summarization tasks where latency and throughput are as critical as deep reasoning depth. For pipelines where you need to balance reasoning quality against high-frequency retrieval, test Gemini for its throughput efficiency and Claude for its precision-first workflows.